From: Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@gmail.com>
To: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
Cc: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>, Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@nxp.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v1] ARM: imx: mach-imx6q: correctly identify i.MX6QP SoCs
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2020 11:52:39 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201104165239.4738-1-TheSven73@gmail.com> (raw)
The i.MX6QP rev 1.1 SoC on my board is mis-identified by Linux:
the log (incorrectly) shows "i.MX6Q rev 2.1".
Correct this by assuming that every SoC that identifies as
i.MX6Q with rev >= 2.0 is really an i.MX6QP.
Signed-off-by: Sven Van Asbroeck <TheSven73@gmail.com>
---
Tree: v5.10-rc2
To: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
Cc: NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>
Cc: Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@nxp.com>
Cc: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c | 9 +++++++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c
index 85c084a716ab..703998ebb52e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c
@@ -245,8 +245,13 @@ static void __init imx6q_axi_init(void)
static void __init imx6q_init_machine(void)
{
- if (cpu_is_imx6q() && imx_get_soc_revision() == IMX_CHIP_REVISION_2_0)
- imx_print_silicon_rev("i.MX6QP", IMX_CHIP_REVISION_1_0);
+ if (cpu_is_imx6q() && imx_get_soc_revision() >= IMX_CHIP_REVISION_2_0)
+ /*
+ * SoCs that identify as i.MX6Q >= rev 2.0 are really i.MX6QP.
+ * Quirk: i.MX6QP revision = i.MX6Q revision - (1, 0),
+ * e.g. i.MX6QP rev 1.1 identifies as i.MX6Q rev 2.1.
+ */
+ imx_print_silicon_rev("i.MX6QP", imx_get_soc_revision() - 0x10);
else
imx_print_silicon_rev(cpu_is_imx6dl() ? "i.MX6DL" : "i.MX6Q",
imx_get_soc_revision());
--
2.17.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next reply other threads:[~2020-11-04 16:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-04 16:52 Sven Van Asbroeck [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-11-04 16:54 [PATCH v1] ARM: imx: mach-imx6q: correctly identify i.MX6QP SoCs Sven Van Asbroeck
2020-11-05 1:04 ` Fabio Estevam
2020-11-10 2:21 ` Shawn Guo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201104165239.4738-1-TheSven73@gmail.com \
--to=thesven73@gmail.com \
--cc=Anson.Huang@nxp.com \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=peng.fan@nxp.com \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).