[PATCH v9 0/5] Exynos: Simple QoS for exynos-bus using interconnect

[PATCH v9 0/5] Exynos: Simple QoS for exynos-bus using interconnect

[Sylwester Nawrocki]

This patchset adds interconnect API support for the Exynos SoC "samsung,
exynos-bus" compatible devices, which already have their corresponding
exynos-bus driver in the devfreq subsystem.  Complementing the devfreq
driver with an interconnect functionality allows to ensure the QoS
requirements of devices accessing the system memory (e.g. video processing
devices) are fulfilled and allows to avoid issues like the one discussed
in thread [1].

This patch series adds implementation of the interconnect provider per each
"samsung,exynos-bus" compatible DT node, with one interconnect node per
provider.  The interconnect code which was previously added as a part of
the devfreq driver has been converted to a separate platform driver.
In the devfreq a corresponding virtual child platform device is registered.
Integration of devfreq and interconnect frameworks is achieved through
the PM QoS API.

A sample interconnect consumer for exynos-mixer is added in patch 5/5,
it is currently added only for exynos4412 and allows to address the
mixer DMA underrun error issues [1].

Changes since v8:
 - excluded from the series already applied dts patches, 
 - Co-developed-by/Signed-off-by tag corrections, Ack tags added,
 - the maintainers entry corrections adressing review comments,
 - Kconfig/Makefile improvements/corrections,
 - whitespace/indentation cleanup.

The series has been tested on Odroid U3 board. It is based on v5.10-rc1.

--
Regards,
Sylwester

Changes since v7:
 - drivers/interconnect/exynos renamed to drivers/interconnect/samsung,
 - added INTERCONNECT_SAMSUNG Kconfig symbol,
 - added missing driver sync_state callback,
 - improved the DT binding description,
 - added a patch adding maintainers entry,
 - updated comment in patch 7/7, typo fix (patch 1/7).

Changes since v6:
 - the interconnect consumer DT bindings are now used to describe dependencies
   of the interconnects (samsung,exynos-bus nodes),
 - bus-width property replaced with samsung,data-clk-ratio,
 - adaptation to recent changes in the interconnect code
   (of_icc_get_from_provider(), icc_node_add()).

Changes since v5:
 - addition of "bus-width: DT property, which specifies data width
   of the interconnect bus (patches 1...2/6),
 - addition of synchronization of the interconnect bandwidth setting
   with VSYNC (patch 6/6).

Changes since v3 [4] (v4 skipped to align with patchset [1]), detailed
changes are listed in patches:
 - conversion to a separate interconnect (platform) driver,
 - an update of the DT binding documenting new optional properties:
   #interconnect-cells, samsung,interconnect-parent in "samsung,exynos-bus"
   nodes,
 - new DT properties added to the SoC, rather than to the board specific
   files.

Changes since v2 [5]:
 - Use icc_std_aggregate().
 - Implement a different modification of apply_constraints() in
   drivers/interconnect/core.c (patch 03).
 - Use 'exynos,interconnect-parent-node' in the DT instead of
   'devfreq'/'parent', depending on the bus.
 - Rebase on DT patches that deprecate the 'devfreq' DT property.
 - Improve error handling, including freeing generated IDs on failure.
 - Remove exynos_bus_icc_connect() and add exynos_bus_icc_get_parent().

Changes since v1 [6]:
 - Rebase on coupled regulators patches.
 - Use dev_pm_qos_*() API instead of overriding frequency in
   exynos_bus_target().
 - Use IDR for node ID allocation.
 - Reverse order of multiplication and division in
   mixer_set_memory_bandwidth() (patch 07) to avoid integer overflow.


References:
[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10861757/ (original issue)
[2] https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg70014.html
[3] https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg810722.html
[4] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20191220115653.6487-1-a.swigon@samsung.com
[5] https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11054417/ (v1 of this RFC)
[6] https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11152595/ (v2 of this RFC)


Sylwester Nawrocki (5):
  dt-bindings: devfreq: Add documentation for the interconnect
    properties
  interconnect: Add generic interconnect driver for Exynos SoCs
  MAINTAINERS: Add entry for Samsung interconnect drivers
  PM / devfreq: exynos-bus: Add registration of interconnect child
    device
  drm: exynos: mixer: Add interconnect support

 .../devicetree/bindings/devfreq/exynos-bus.txt     |  71 +++++++-
 MAINTAINERS                                        |   8 +
 drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c                       |  17 ++
 drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_mixer.c              | 146 ++++++++++++++-
 drivers/interconnect/Kconfig                       |   1 +
 drivers/interconnect/Makefile                      |   1 +
 drivers/interconnect/samsung/Kconfig               |  13 ++
 drivers/interconnect/samsung/Makefile              |   4 +
 drivers/interconnect/samsung/exynos.c              | 199 +++++++++++++++++++++
 9 files changed, 450 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 drivers/interconnect/samsung/Kconfig
 create mode 100644 drivers/interconnect/samsung/Makefile
 create mode 100644 drivers/interconnect/samsung/exynos.c

-- 
2.7.4


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH v9 1/5] dt-bindings: devfreq: Add documentation for the interconnect properties

[Sylwester Nawrocki]

Add documentation for new optional properties in the exynos bus nodes:
interconnects, #interconnect-cells, samsung,data-clock-ratio.
These properties allow to specify the SoC interconnect structure which
then allows the interconnect consumer devices to request specific
bandwidth requirements.

Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Artur Świgoń <a.swigon@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
---
Changes for v9:
 - added Ack tags

Changes for v8:
 - updated description of the interconnects property,
 - fixed typo in samsung,data-clk-ratio property description.

Changes for v7:
 - bus-width property replaced with samsung,data-clock-ratio,
 - the interconnect consumer bindings used instead of vendor specific
   properties

Changes for v6:
 - added dts example of bus hierarchy definition and the interconnect
   consumer,
 - added new bus-width property.

Changes for v5:
 - exynos,interconnect-parent-node renamed to samsung,interconnect-parent
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/devfreq/exynos-bus.txt     | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 69 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/devfreq/exynos-bus.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/devfreq/exynos-bus.txt
index e71f752..bcaa2c0 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/devfreq/exynos-bus.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/devfreq/exynos-bus.txt
@@ -51,6 +51,19 @@ Optional properties only for parent bus device:
 - exynos,saturation-ratio: the percentage value which is used to calibrate
 			the performance count against total cycle count.
 
+Optional properties for the interconnect functionality (QoS frequency
+constraints):
+- #interconnect-cells: should be 0.
+- interconnects: as documented in ../interconnect.txt, describes a path at the
+  higher level interconnects used by this interconnect provider.
+  If this interconnect provider is directly linked to a top level interconnect
+  provider the property contains only one phandle. The provider extends
+  the interconnect graph by linking its node to a node registered by provider
+  pointed to by first phandle in the 'interconnects' property.
+
+- samsung,data-clock-ratio: ratio of the data throughput in B/s to minimum data
+   clock frequency in Hz, default value is 8 when this property is missing.
+
 Detailed correlation between sub-blocks and power line according to Exynos SoC:
 - In case of Exynos3250, there are two power line as following:
 	VDD_MIF |--- DMC
@@ -135,7 +148,7 @@ Detailed correlation between sub-blocks and power line according to Exynos SoC:
 		|--- PERIC (Fixed clock rate)
 		|--- FSYS  (Fixed clock rate)
 
-Example1:
+Example 1:
 	Show the AXI buses of Exynos3250 SoC. Exynos3250 divides the buses to
 	power line (regulator). The MIF (Memory Interface) AXI bus is used to
 	transfer data between DRAM and CPU and uses the VDD_MIF regulator.
@@ -184,7 +197,7 @@ Example1:
 	|L5   |200000 |200000  |400000 |300000 |       ||1000000 |
 	----------------------------------------------------------
 
-Example2 :
+Example 2:
 	The bus of DMC (Dynamic Memory Controller) block in exynos3250.dtsi
 	is listed below:
 
@@ -419,3 +432,57 @@ Example2 :
 		devfreq = <&bus_leftbus>;
 		status = "okay";
 	};
+
+Example 3:
+	An interconnect path "bus_display -- bus_leftbus -- bus_dmc" on
+	Exynos4412 SoC with video mixer as an interconnect consumer device.
+
+	soc {
+		bus_dmc: bus_dmc {
+			compatible = "samsung,exynos-bus";
+			clocks = <&clock CLK_DIV_DMC>;
+			clock-names = "bus";
+			operating-points-v2 = <&bus_dmc_opp_table>;
+			samsung,data-clock-ratio = <4>;
+			#interconnect-cells = <0>;
+		};
+
+		bus_leftbus: bus_leftbus {
+			compatible = "samsung,exynos-bus";
+			clocks = <&clock CLK_DIV_GDL>;
+			clock-names = "bus";
+			operating-points-v2 = <&bus_leftbus_opp_table>;
+			#interconnect-cells = <0>;
+			interconnects = <&bus_dmc>;
+		};
+
+		bus_display: bus_display {
+			compatible = "samsung,exynos-bus";
+			clocks = <&clock CLK_ACLK160>;
+			clock-names = "bus";
+			operating-points-v2 = <&bus_display_opp_table>;
+			#interconnect-cells = <0>;
+			interconnects = <&bus_leftbus &bus_dmc>;
+		};
+
+		bus_dmc_opp_table: opp_table1 {
+			compatible = "operating-points-v2";
+			/* ... */
+		}
+
+		bus_leftbus_opp_table: opp_table3 {
+			compatible = "operating-points-v2";
+			/* ... */
+		};
+
+		bus_display_opp_table: opp_table4 {
+			compatible = "operating-points-v2";
+			/* .. */
+		};
+
+		&mixer {
+			compatible = "samsung,exynos4212-mixer";
+			interconnects = <&bus_display &bus_dmc>;
+			/* ... */
+		};
+	};
-- 
2.7.4


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH v9 2/5] interconnect: Add generic interconnect driver for Exynos SoCs

[Sylwester Nawrocki]

This patch adds a generic interconnect driver for Exynos SoCs in order
to provide interconnect functionality for each "samsung,exynos-bus"
compatible device.

The SoC topology is a graph (or more specifically, a tree) and its
edges are described by specifying in the 'interconnects' property
the interconnect consumer path for each interconnect provider DT node.

Each bus is now an interconnect provider and an interconnect node as
well (cf. Documentation/interconnect/interconnect.rst), i.e. every bus
registers itself as a node. Node IDs are not hard coded but rather
assigned dynamically at runtime. This approach allows for using this
driver with various Exynos SoCs.

Frequencies requested via the interconnect API for a given node are
propagated to devfreq using dev_pm_qos_update_request(). Please note
that it is not an error when CONFIG_INTERCONNECT is 'n', in which
case all interconnect API functions are no-op.

The samsung,data-clk-ratio DT property is used to specify the ratio
of the interconect bandwidth to the minimum data clock frequency
for each bus.

Due to unspecified relative probing order, -EPROBE_DEFER may be
propagated to ensure that the parent is probed before its children.

Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Artur Świgoń <a.swigon@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
---
Changes for v9:
 - Makefile and Kconfig fixes/improvements.

Changes for v8:
 - renamed drivers/interconnect/exynos to drivers/interconnect/samsung,
 - added missing driver sync_state callback assignment.

Changes for v7:
 - adjusted to the DT property changes: "interconnects" instead
   of "samsung,interconnect-parent", "samsung,data-clk-ratio"
   instead of "bus-width",
 - adaptation to of_icc_get_from_provider() function changes
   in v5.10-rc1.

Changes for v6:
 - corrected of_node dereferencing in exynos_icc_get_parent()
   function,
 - corrected initialization of icc_node->name so as to avoid
   direct of_node->name dereferencing,
 - added parsing of bus-width DT property.

Changes for v5:
 - adjust to renamed exynos,interconnect-parent-node property,
 - use automatically generated platform device id as the interconect
   node id instead of a now unavailable devfreq->id field,
 - add icc_ prefix to some variables to make the code more self-commenting,
 - use icc_nodes_remove() instead of icc_node_del() + icc_node_destroy(),
 - adjust to exynos,interconnect-parent-node property rename to
   samsung,interconnect-parent,
 - converted to a separate platform driver in drivers/interconnect.
---
 drivers/interconnect/Kconfig          |   1 +
 drivers/interconnect/Makefile         |   1 +
 drivers/interconnect/samsung/Kconfig  |  13 +++
 drivers/interconnect/samsung/Makefile |   4 +
 drivers/interconnect/samsung/exynos.c | 199 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 5 files changed, 218 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/interconnect/samsung/Kconfig
 create mode 100644 drivers/interconnect/samsung/Makefile
 create mode 100644 drivers/interconnect/samsung/exynos.c

diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/Kconfig b/drivers/interconnect/Kconfig
index 5b7204e..d637a89 100644
--- a/drivers/interconnect/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/interconnect/Kconfig
@@ -13,5 +13,6 @@ if INTERCONNECT
 
 source "drivers/interconnect/imx/Kconfig"
 source "drivers/interconnect/qcom/Kconfig"
+source "drivers/interconnect/samsung/Kconfig"
 
 endif
diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/Makefile b/drivers/interconnect/Makefile
index d203520..97d393f 100644
--- a/drivers/interconnect/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/interconnect/Makefile
@@ -6,3 +6,4 @@ icc-core-objs				:= core.o bulk.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_INTERCONNECT)		+= icc-core.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_INTERCONNECT_IMX)		+= imx/
 obj-$(CONFIG_INTERCONNECT_QCOM)		+= qcom/
+obj-$(CONFIG_INTERCONNECT_SAMSUNG)	+= samsung/
diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/samsung/Kconfig b/drivers/interconnect/samsung/Kconfig
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6820e4f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/interconnect/samsung/Kconfig
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+config INTERCONNECT_SAMSUNG
+	bool "Samsung SoC interconnect drivers"
+	depends on ARCH_EXYNOS || COMPILE_TEST
+	help
+	  Interconnect drivers for Samsung SoCs.
+
+config INTERCONNECT_EXYNOS
+	tristate "Exynos generic interconnect driver"
+	depends on INTERCONNECT_SAMSUNG
+	default y if ARCH_EXYNOS
+	help
+	  Generic interconnect driver for Exynos SoCs.
diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/samsung/Makefile b/drivers/interconnect/samsung/Makefile
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e19d1df
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/interconnect/samsung/Makefile
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+exynos-interconnect-objs		:= exynos.o
+
+obj-$(CONFIG_INTERCONNECT_EXYNOS)	+= exynos-interconnect.o
diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/samsung/exynos.c b/drivers/interconnect/samsung/exynos.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6559d8c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/interconnect/samsung/exynos.c
@@ -0,0 +1,199 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+/*
+ * Exynos generic interconnect provider driver
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2020 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
+ *
+ * Authors: Artur Świgoń <a.swigon@samsung.com>
+ *          Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
+ */
+#include <linux/device.h>
+#include <linux/interconnect-provider.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/pm_qos.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+
+#define EXYNOS_ICC_DEFAULT_BUS_CLK_RATIO	8
+
+struct exynos_icc_priv {
+	struct device *dev;
+
+	/* One interconnect node per provider */
+	struct icc_provider provider;
+	struct icc_node *node;
+
+	struct dev_pm_qos_request qos_req;
+	u32 bus_clk_ratio;
+};
+
+static struct icc_node *exynos_icc_get_parent(struct device_node *np)
+{
+	struct of_phandle_args args;
+	struct icc_node_data *icc_node_data;
+	struct icc_node *icc_node;
+	int num, ret;
+
+	num = of_count_phandle_with_args(np, "interconnects",
+					 "#interconnect-cells");
+	if (num < 1)
+		return NULL; /* parent nodes are optional */
+
+	/* Get the interconnect target node */
+	ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, "interconnects",
+					"#interconnect-cells", 0, &args);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ERR_PTR(ret);
+
+	icc_node_data = of_icc_get_from_provider(&args);
+	of_node_put(args.np);
+
+	if (IS_ERR(icc_node_data))
+		return ERR_CAST(icc_node_data);
+
+	icc_node = icc_node_data->node;
+	kfree(icc_node_data);
+
+	return icc_node;
+}
+
+static int exynos_generic_icc_set(struct icc_node *src, struct icc_node *dst)
+{
+	struct exynos_icc_priv *src_priv = src->data, *dst_priv = dst->data;
+	s32 src_freq = max(src->avg_bw, src->peak_bw) / src_priv->bus_clk_ratio;
+	s32 dst_freq = max(dst->avg_bw, dst->peak_bw) / dst_priv->bus_clk_ratio;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = dev_pm_qos_update_request(&src_priv->qos_req, src_freq);
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		dev_err(src_priv->dev, "failed to update PM QoS of %s (src)\n",
+			src->name);
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	ret = dev_pm_qos_update_request(&dst_priv->qos_req, dst_freq);
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		dev_err(dst_priv->dev, "failed to update PM QoS of %s (dst)\n",
+			dst->name);
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static struct icc_node *exynos_generic_icc_xlate(struct of_phandle_args *spec,
+						 void *data)
+{
+	struct exynos_icc_priv *priv = data;
+
+	if (spec->np != priv->dev->parent->of_node)
+		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+
+	return priv->node;
+}
+
+static int exynos_generic_icc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct exynos_icc_priv *priv = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+	struct icc_node *parent_node, *node = priv->node;
+
+	parent_node = exynos_icc_get_parent(priv->dev->parent->of_node);
+	if (parent_node && !IS_ERR(parent_node))
+		icc_link_destroy(node, parent_node);
+
+	icc_nodes_remove(&priv->provider);
+	icc_provider_del(&priv->provider);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int exynos_generic_icc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct device *bus_dev = pdev->dev.parent;
+	struct exynos_icc_priv *priv;
+	struct icc_provider *provider;
+	struct icc_node *icc_node, *icc_parent_node;
+	int ret;
+
+	priv = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!priv)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	priv->dev = &pdev->dev;
+	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, priv);
+
+	provider = &priv->provider;
+
+	provider->set = exynos_generic_icc_set;
+	provider->aggregate = icc_std_aggregate;
+	provider->xlate = exynos_generic_icc_xlate;
+	provider->dev = bus_dev;
+	provider->inter_set = true;
+	provider->data = priv;
+
+	ret = icc_provider_add(provider);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
+
+	icc_node = icc_node_create(pdev->id);
+	if (IS_ERR(icc_node)) {
+		ret = PTR_ERR(icc_node);
+		goto err_prov_del;
+	}
+
+	priv->node = icc_node;
+	icc_node->name = devm_kasprintf(&pdev->dev, GFP_KERNEL, "%pOFn",
+					bus_dev->of_node);
+	if (of_property_read_u32(bus_dev->of_node, "samsung,data-clock-ratio",
+				 &priv->bus_clk_ratio))
+		priv->bus_clk_ratio = EXYNOS_ICC_DEFAULT_BUS_CLK_RATIO;
+
+	/*
+	 * Register a PM QoS request for the parent (devfreq) device.
+	 */
+	ret = dev_pm_qos_add_request(bus_dev, &priv->qos_req,
+				     DEV_PM_QOS_MIN_FREQUENCY, 0);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		goto err_node_del;
+
+	icc_node->data = priv;
+	icc_node_add(icc_node, provider);
+
+	icc_parent_node = exynos_icc_get_parent(bus_dev->of_node);
+	if (IS_ERR(icc_parent_node)) {
+		ret = PTR_ERR(icc_parent_node);
+		goto err_pmqos_del;
+	}
+	if (icc_parent_node) {
+		ret = icc_link_create(icc_node, icc_parent_node->id);
+		if (ret < 0)
+			goto err_pmqos_del;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+
+err_pmqos_del:
+	dev_pm_qos_remove_request(&priv->qos_req);
+err_node_del:
+	icc_nodes_remove(provider);
+err_prov_del:
+	icc_provider_del(provider);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static struct platform_driver exynos_generic_icc_driver = {
+	.driver = {
+		.name = "exynos-generic-icc",
+		.sync_state = icc_sync_state,
+	},
+	.probe = exynos_generic_icc_probe,
+	.remove = exynos_generic_icc_remove,
+};
+module_platform_driver(exynos_generic_icc_driver);
+
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Exynos generic interconnect driver");
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Artur Świgoń <a.swigon@samsung.com>");
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
+MODULE_ALIAS("platform:exynos-generic-icc");
-- 
2.7.4


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH v9 3/5] MAINTAINERS: Add entry for Samsung interconnect drivers

[Sylwester Nawrocki]

Add maintainers entry for the Samsung SoC interconnect drivers, this
currently includes the Exynos generic interconnect driver.

Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
---
Changes for v9:
 - add linux-samsung-soc ML,
 - fixed Artur's last name spelling,
 - whole entry moved to maintain alphabetical order,
 - added missing traling '/' to directory path.

Changes since v7:
 - new patch.
---
 MAINTAINERS | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index e73636b..1d8246c 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -15400,6 +15400,14 @@ L:	linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org
 S:	Maintained
 F:	drivers/video/fbdev/s3c-fb.c
 
+SAMSUNG INTERCONNECT DRIVERS
+M:	Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
+M:	Artur Świgoń <a.swigon@samsung.com>
+L:	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
+L:	linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
+S:	Supported
+F:	drivers/interconnect/samsung/
+
 SAMSUNG LAPTOP DRIVER
 M:	Corentin Chary <corentin.chary@gmail.com>
 L:	platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org
-- 
2.7.4


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH v9 3/5] MAINTAINERS: Add entry for Samsung interconnect drivers

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 03:09:29PM +0100, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> Add maintainers entry for the Samsung SoC interconnect drivers, this
> currently includes the Exynos generic interconnect driver.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
> ---
> Changes for v9:
>  - add linux-samsung-soc ML,
>  - fixed Artur's last name spelling,
>  - whole entry moved to maintain alphabetical order,
>  - added missing traling '/' to directory path.
> 
> Changes since v7:
>  - new patch.
> ---
>  MAINTAINERS | 8 ++++++++
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 

Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>

Best regards,
Krzysztof

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH v9 4/5] PM / devfreq: exynos-bus: Add registration of interconnect child device

[Sylwester Nawrocki]

This patch adds registration of a child platform device for the exynos
interconnect driver. It is assumed that the interconnect provider will
only be needed when #interconnect-cells property is present in the bus
DT node, hence the child device will be created only when such a property
is present.

Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
---
Changes for v9:
 - whitespace (indentation) corrections.

Changes for v8...v6:
 - none.

Changes for v5:
 - new patch.
---
 drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c b/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
index 1e684a4..20447a4 100644
--- a/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
+++ b/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
 
 struct exynos_bus {
 	struct device *dev;
+	struct platform_device *icc_pdev;
 
 	struct devfreq *devfreq;
 	struct devfreq_event_dev **edev;
@@ -156,6 +157,8 @@ static void exynos_bus_exit(struct device *dev)
 	if (ret < 0)
 		dev_warn(dev, "failed to disable the devfreq-event devices\n");
 
+	platform_device_unregister(bus->icc_pdev);
+
 	dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(dev);
 	clk_disable_unprepare(bus->clk);
 	if (bus->opp_table) {
@@ -168,6 +171,8 @@ static void exynos_bus_passive_exit(struct device *dev)
 {
 	struct exynos_bus *bus = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
 
+	platform_device_unregister(bus->icc_pdev);
+
 	dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(dev);
 	clk_disable_unprepare(bus->clk);
 }
@@ -432,6 +437,18 @@ static int exynos_bus_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (ret < 0)
 		goto err;
 
+	/* Create child platform device for the interconnect provider */
+	if (of_get_property(dev->of_node, "#interconnect-cells", NULL)) {
+		bus->icc_pdev = platform_device_register_data(
+						dev, "exynos-generic-icc",
+						PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO, NULL, 0);
+
+		if (IS_ERR(bus->icc_pdev)) {
+			ret = PTR_ERR(bus->icc_pdev);
+			goto err;
+		}
+	}
+
 	max_state = bus->devfreq->profile->max_state;
 	min_freq = (bus->devfreq->profile->freq_table[0] / 1000);
 	max_freq = (bus->devfreq->profile->freq_table[max_state - 1] / 1000);
-- 
2.7.4


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH v9 5/5] drm: exynos: mixer: Add interconnect support

[Sylwester Nawrocki]

This patch adds interconnect support to exynos-mixer. The mixer works
the same as before when CONFIG_INTERCONNECT is 'n'.

For proper operation of the video mixer block we need to ensure the
interconnect busses like DMC or LEFTBUS provide enough bandwidth so
as to avoid DMA buffer underruns in the mixer block. I.e we need to
prevent those busses from operating in low perfomance OPPs when
the mixer is running.
In this patch the bus bandwidth request is done through the interconnect
API, the bandwidth value is calculated from selected DRM mode, i.e.
video plane width, height, refresh rate and pixel format.

The bandwidth setting is synchronized with VSYNC when we are switching
to lower bandwidth. This is required to ensure enough bandwidth for
the device since new settings are normally being applied in the hardware
synchronously with VSYNC.

Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
Co-developed-by: Artur Świgoń <a.swigon@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Artur Świgoń <a.swigon@samsung.com>
Co-developed-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
---
Changes for v9:
 - whitespace cleanup,
 - Co-developed-by/Signed-off-by tags corrections.

Changes for v8:
 - updated comment in mixer_probe()

Changes for v7:
 - fixed incorrect setting of the ICC bandwidth when the mixer is
   disabled, now the bandwidth is set explicitly to 0 in such case.

Changes for v6:
 - the icc_set_bw() call is now only done when calculated value for
   a crtc changes, this avoids unnecessary calls per each video frame
 - added synchronization of the interconnect bandwidth setting with
   the mixer VSYNC in order to avoid buffer underflow when we lower
   the interconnect bandwidth when the hardware still operates with
   previous mode settings that require higher bandwidth. This fixed
   IOMMU faults observed e.g. during switching from two planes to
   a single plane operation.

Changes for v5:
 - renamed soc_path variable to icc_path
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_mixer.c | 146 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 138 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_mixer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_mixer.c
index af192e5..502ce04 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_mixer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_mixer.c
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
 #include <linux/component.h>
 #include <linux/delay.h>
 #include <linux/i2c.h>
+#include <linux/interconnect.h>
 #include <linux/interrupt.h>
 #include <linux/irq.h>
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
@@ -73,6 +74,7 @@ enum mixer_flag_bits {
 	MXR_BIT_INTERLACE,
 	MXR_BIT_VP_ENABLED,
 	MXR_BIT_HAS_SCLK,
+	MXR_BIT_REQUEST_BW,
 };
 
 static const uint32_t mixer_formats[] = {
@@ -99,6 +101,13 @@ struct mixer_context {
 	struct exynos_drm_plane	planes[MIXER_WIN_NR];
 	unsigned long		flags;
 
+	struct icc_path		*icc_path;
+	/* memory bandwidth on the interconnect bus in B/s */
+	unsigned long		icc_bandwidth;
+	/* mutex protecting @icc_bandwidth */
+	struct mutex		icc_lock;
+	struct work_struct	work;
+
 	int			irq;
 	void __iomem		*mixer_regs;
 	void __iomem		*vp_regs;
@@ -754,6 +763,9 @@ static irqreturn_t mixer_irq_handler(int irq, void *arg)
 		val |= MXR_INT_CLEAR_VSYNC;
 		val &= ~MXR_INT_STATUS_VSYNC;
 
+		if (test_and_clear_bit(MXR_BIT_REQUEST_BW, &ctx->flags))
+			schedule_work(&ctx->work);
+
 		/* interlace scan need to check shadow register */
 		if (test_bit(MXR_BIT_INTERLACE, &ctx->flags)
 		    && !mixer_is_synced(ctx))
@@ -934,6 +946,76 @@ static void mixer_disable_vblank(struct exynos_drm_crtc *crtc)
 	mixer_reg_writemask(mixer_ctx, MXR_INT_EN, 0, MXR_INT_EN_VSYNC);
 }
 
+/**
+ * mixer_get_memory_bandwidth - calculate memory bandwidth for current crtc mode
+ * @crtc: a crtc with DRM mode to calculate the bandwidth for
+ *
+ * Return: memory bandwidth in B/s
+ *
+ * This function returns memory bandwidth calculated as a sum of amount of data
+ * per second for each plane. The calculation is based on maximum possible pixel
+ * resolution for a plane so as to avoid different bandwidth request per each
+ * video frame. The formula used for calculation for each plane is:
+ *
+ * bw = width * height * frame_rate / interlace / (hor_subs * vert_subs)
+ *
+ * where:
+ *  - width, height - (DRM mode) video frame width and height in pixels,
+ *  - frame_rate - DRM mode frame refresh rate,
+ *  - interlace: 1 - in case of progressive and 2 in case of interlaced video,
+ *  - hor_subs, vert_subs - accordingly horizontal and vertical pixel
+ *    subsampling for a plane.
+ */
+static unsigned int mixer_get_memory_bandwidth(struct exynos_drm_crtc *crtc)
+{
+	struct drm_display_mode *mode = &crtc->base.state->adjusted_mode;
+	struct mixer_context *ctx = crtc->ctx;
+	unsigned long bw, bandwidth = 0;
+	int i, j, sub;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < MIXER_WIN_NR; i++) {
+		struct drm_plane *plane = &ctx->planes[i].base;
+		const struct drm_format_info *format;
+
+		if (plane->state && plane->state->crtc && plane->state->fb) {
+			format = plane->state->fb->format;
+			bw = mode->hdisplay * mode->vdisplay *
+							drm_mode_vrefresh(mode);
+			if (mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_INTERLACE)
+				bw /= 2;
+			for (j = 0; j < format->num_planes; j++) {
+				sub = j ? (format->vsub * format->hsub) : 1;
+				bandwidth += format->cpp[j] * bw / sub;
+			}
+		}
+	}
+
+	return bandwidth;
+}
+
+static void mixer_set_icc_bandwidth(struct mixer_context *ctx,
+				    unsigned long bandwidth)
+{
+	u32 avg_bw, peak_bw;
+
+	/* add 20% safety margin */
+	bandwidth = bandwidth / 4 * 5;
+
+	avg_bw = peak_bw = Bps_to_icc(bandwidth);
+	icc_set_bw(ctx->icc_path, avg_bw, peak_bw);
+
+	dev_dbg(ctx->dev, "safe bandwidth %lu Bps\n", bandwidth);
+}
+
+static void mixer_icc_request_fn(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+	struct mixer_context *ctx = container_of(work, struct mixer_context,
+						 work);
+	mutex_lock(&ctx->icc_lock);
+	mixer_set_icc_bandwidth(ctx, ctx->icc_bandwidth);
+	mutex_unlock(&ctx->icc_lock);
+}
+
 static void mixer_atomic_begin(struct exynos_drm_crtc *crtc)
 {
 	struct mixer_context *ctx = crtc->ctx;
@@ -980,12 +1062,35 @@ static void mixer_disable_plane(struct exynos_drm_crtc *crtc,
 
 static void mixer_atomic_flush(struct exynos_drm_crtc *crtc)
 {
-	struct mixer_context *mixer_ctx = crtc->ctx;
+	struct mixer_context *ctx = crtc->ctx;
+	int bw, prev_bw;
 
-	if (!test_bit(MXR_BIT_POWERED, &mixer_ctx->flags))
+	if (!test_bit(MXR_BIT_POWERED, &ctx->flags))
 		return;
 
-	mixer_enable_sync(mixer_ctx);
+	/*
+	 * Request necessary bandwidth on the interconnects. If new
+	 * bandwidth is greater than current value set the new value
+	 * immediately. Otherwise request lower bandwidth only after
+	 * VSYNC, after the HW has actually switched to new video
+	 * frame settings.
+	 */
+	if (ctx->icc_path) {
+		bw = mixer_get_memory_bandwidth(crtc);
+
+		mutex_lock(&ctx->icc_lock);
+		prev_bw = ctx->icc_bandwidth;
+		ctx->icc_bandwidth = bw;
+
+		if (bw > prev_bw)
+			mixer_set_icc_bandwidth(ctx, bw);
+		else if (bw < prev_bw)
+			set_bit(MXR_BIT_REQUEST_BW, &ctx->flags);
+
+		mutex_unlock(&ctx->icc_lock);
+	}
+
+	mixer_enable_sync(ctx);
 	exynos_crtc_handle_event(crtc);
 }
 
@@ -1036,6 +1141,8 @@ static void mixer_atomic_disable(struct exynos_drm_crtc *crtc)
 
 	pm_runtime_put(ctx->dev);
 
+	mixer_set_icc_bandwidth(ctx, 0);
+
 	clear_bit(MXR_BIT_POWERED, &ctx->flags);
 }
 
@@ -1223,19 +1330,33 @@ static int mixer_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
 	const struct mixer_drv_data *drv;
 	struct mixer_context *ctx;
+	struct icc_path *path;
 	int ret;
 
+	/*
+	 * Returns NULL if CONFIG_INTERCONNECT is disabled or if "interconnects"
+	 * property does not exist. May return ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER).
+	 */
+	path = of_icc_get(dev, NULL);
+	if (IS_ERR(path))
+		return PTR_ERR(path);
+
 	ctx = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!ctx) {
 		DRM_DEV_ERROR(dev, "failed to alloc mixer context.\n");
-		return -ENOMEM;
+		ret = -ENOMEM;
+		goto err;
 	}
 
 	drv = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
 
+	INIT_WORK(&ctx->work, mixer_icc_request_fn);
+	mutex_init(&ctx->icc_lock);
+
 	ctx->pdev = pdev;
 	ctx->dev = dev;
 	ctx->mxr_ver = drv->version;
+	ctx->icc_path = path;
 
 	if (drv->is_vp_enabled)
 		__set_bit(MXR_BIT_VP_ENABLED, &ctx->flags);
@@ -1247,17 +1368,26 @@ static int mixer_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	pm_runtime_enable(dev);
 
 	ret = component_add(&pdev->dev, &mixer_component_ops);
-	if (ret)
+	if (ret) {
 		pm_runtime_disable(dev);
-
+		goto err;
+	}
+	return 0;
+err:
+	icc_put(path);
 	return ret;
 }
 
 static int mixer_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
-	pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
+	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+	struct mixer_context *ctx = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+
+	pm_runtime_disable(dev);
+
+	component_del(dev, &mixer_component_ops);
 
-	component_del(&pdev->dev, &mixer_component_ops);
+	icc_put(ctx->icc_path);
 
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.7.4


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH v9 0/5] Exynos: Simple QoS for exynos-bus using interconnect

[Georgi Djakov]

On 11/12/20 16:09, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> 
> This patchset adds interconnect API support for the Exynos SoC "samsung,
> exynos-bus" compatible devices, which already have their corresponding
> exynos-bus driver in the devfreq subsystem.  Complementing the devfreq
> driver with an interconnect functionality allows to ensure the QoS
> requirements of devices accessing the system memory (e.g. video processing
> devices) are fulfilled and allows to avoid issues like the one discussed
> in thread [1].
> 
> This patch series adds implementation of the interconnect provider per each
> "samsung,exynos-bus" compatible DT node, with one interconnect node per
> provider.  The interconnect code which was previously added as a part of
> the devfreq driver has been converted to a separate platform driver.
> In the devfreq a corresponding virtual child platform device is registered.
> Integration of devfreq and interconnect frameworks is achieved through
> the PM QoS API.
> 
> A sample interconnect consumer for exynos-mixer is added in patch 5/5,
> it is currently added only for exynos4412 and allows to address the
> mixer DMA underrun error issues [1].

Good work Sylwester! Thank you and all the reviewers! What would be the merge
path for this patchset? Looks like there is no build dependency between patches.
Should i take just patches 2,3 or also patch 1? Chanwoo?

Thanks,
Georgi

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH v9 0/5] Exynos: Simple QoS for exynos-bus using interconnect

[Chanwoo Choi]

On 11/13/20 5:48 PM, Georgi Djakov wrote:
> On 11/12/20 16:09, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
>>
>> This patchset adds interconnect API support for the Exynos SoC "samsung,
>> exynos-bus" compatible devices, which already have their corresponding
>> exynos-bus driver in the devfreq subsystem.  Complementing the devfreq
>> driver with an interconnect functionality allows to ensure the QoS
>> requirements of devices accessing the system memory (e.g. video processing
>> devices) are fulfilled and allows to avoid issues like the one discussed
>> in thread [1].
>>
>> This patch series adds implementation of the interconnect provider per each
>> "samsung,exynos-bus" compatible DT node, with one interconnect node per
>> provider.  The interconnect code which was previously added as a part of
>> the devfreq driver has been converted to a separate platform driver.
>> In the devfreq a corresponding virtual child platform device is registered.
>> Integration of devfreq and interconnect frameworks is achieved through
>> the PM QoS API.
>>
>> A sample interconnect consumer for exynos-mixer is added in patch 5/5,
>> it is currently added only for exynos4412 and allows to address the
>> mixer DMA underrun error issues [1].
> 
> Good work Sylwester! Thank you and all the reviewers! What would be the merge
> path for this patchset? Looks like there is no build dependency between patches.
> Should i take just patches 2,3 or also patch 1? Chanwoo?

Hi Georgi,

If you take the patch 2,3, I'll apply patch 1,4 to devfreq.git.

Hi Sylwester,
First of all, thanks for your work to finish it for a long time.
I'm very happy about finishing this work. It is very necessary feature
for the QoS. Once again, thank for your work.

-- 
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH v9 0/5] Exynos: Simple QoS for exynos-bus using interconnect

[Georgi Djakov]

On 11/13/20 11:07, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> On 11/13/20 5:48 PM, Georgi Djakov wrote:
>> On 11/12/20 16:09, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
>>>
>>> This patchset adds interconnect API support for the Exynos SoC "samsung,
>>> exynos-bus" compatible devices, which already have their corresponding
>>> exynos-bus driver in the devfreq subsystem.  Complementing the devfreq
>>> driver with an interconnect functionality allows to ensure the QoS
>>> requirements of devices accessing the system memory (e.g. video processing
>>> devices) are fulfilled and allows to avoid issues like the one discussed
>>> in thread [1].
>>>
>>> This patch series adds implementation of the interconnect provider per each
>>> "samsung,exynos-bus" compatible DT node, with one interconnect node per
>>> provider.  The interconnect code which was previously added as a part of
>>> the devfreq driver has been converted to a separate platform driver.
>>> In the devfreq a corresponding virtual child platform device is registered.
>>> Integration of devfreq and interconnect frameworks is achieved through
>>> the PM QoS API.
>>>
>>> A sample interconnect consumer for exynos-mixer is added in patch 5/5,
>>> it is currently added only for exynos4412 and allows to address the
>>> mixer DMA underrun error issues [1].
>>
>> Good work Sylwester! Thank you and all the reviewers! What would be the merge
>> path for this patchset? Looks like there is no build dependency between patches.
>> Should i take just patches 2,3 or also patch 1? Chanwoo?
> 
> Hi Georgi,
> 
> If you take the patch 2,3, I'll apply patch 1,4 to devfreq.git.

Ok, sounds good! Thanks for clarifying!

BR,
Georgi

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH v9 0/5] Exynos: Simple QoS for exynos-bus using interconnect

[Sylwester Nawrocki]

Hi Georgi, Chanwoo,

On 13.11.2020 10:07, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> On 11/13/20 5:48 PM, Georgi Djakov wrote:
>> On 11/12/20 16:09, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
[...]
>>
>> Good work Sylwester! Thank you and all the reviewers! What would be the merge
>> path for this patchset? Looks like there is no build dependency between patches.
>> Should i take just patches 2,3 or also patch 1? Chanwoo?
> 
> Hi Georgi,
> 
> If you take the patch 2,3, I'll apply patch 1,4 to devfreq.git.

> Hi Sylwester,
> First of all, thanks for your work to finish it for a long time.
> I'm very happy about finishing this work. It is very necessary feature
> for the QoS. Once again, thank for your work.

I would also like to thank everyone for provided feedback!

As far as building is concerned the patches could be applied in any
order. I think we could also apply the drm/exynos patch in same
merge window. There could be runtime (or git bisect) regression 
only in case when INTERCONNECT is enabled and only (or as first)
the dts and drm/exynos patches are applied.

Hmm, maybe it's better to hold on with the drm patch, INTERCONNECT
is disabled in arch/arm/configs/{multi_v7_defconfig, exynos_defconfig}  
but it is enabled in arch/arm64/configs/defconfig.

-- 
Regards,
Sylwester

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH v9 0/5] Exynos: Simple QoS for exynos-bus using interconnect

[Marek Szyprowski]

Hi Sylwester,

On 13.11.2020 11:32, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> On 13.11.2020 10:07, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> On 11/13/20 5:48 PM, Georgi Djakov wrote:
>>> On 11/12/20 16:09, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> [...]
>>> Good work Sylwester! Thank you and all the reviewers! What would be the merge
>>> path for this patchset? Looks like there is no build dependency between patches.
>>> Should i take just patches 2,3 or also patch 1? Chanwoo?
>> Hi Georgi,
>>
>> If you take the patch 2,3, I'll apply patch 1,4 to devfreq.git.
>> Hi Sylwester,
>> First of all, thanks for your work to finish it for a long time.
>> I'm very happy about finishing this work. It is very necessary feature
>> for the QoS. Once again, thank for your work.
> I would also like to thank everyone for provided feedback!
>
> As far as building is concerned the patches could be applied in any
> order. I think we could also apply the drm/exynos patch in same
> merge window. There could be runtime (or git bisect) regression
> only in case when INTERCONNECT is enabled and only (or as first)
> the dts and drm/exynos patches are applied.
>
> Hmm, maybe it's better to hold on with the drm patch, INTERCONNECT
> is disabled in arch/arm/configs/{multi_v7_defconfig, exynos_defconfig}
> but it is enabled in arch/arm64/configs/defconfig.

I don't think we need to delay DRM patch. Exynos DRM mixer is not 
available on ARM64 SoCs, so this won't be an issue.

Best regards
-- 
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH v9 0/5] Exynos: Simple QoS for exynos-bus using interconnect

[Chanwoo Choi]

Hi Sylwester,

On 11/12/20 11:09 PM, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> 
> This patchset adds interconnect API support for the Exynos SoC "samsung,
> exynos-bus" compatible devices, which already have their corresponding
> exynos-bus driver in the devfreq subsystem.  Complementing the devfreq
> driver with an interconnect functionality allows to ensure the QoS
> requirements of devices accessing the system memory (e.g. video processing
> devices) are fulfilled and allows to avoid issues like the one discussed
> in thread [1].
> 
> This patch series adds implementation of the interconnect provider per each
> "samsung,exynos-bus" compatible DT node, with one interconnect node per
> provider.  The interconnect code which was previously added as a part of
> the devfreq driver has been converted to a separate platform driver.
> In the devfreq a corresponding virtual child platform device is registered.
> Integration of devfreq and interconnect frameworks is achieved through
> the PM QoS API.
> 
> A sample interconnect consumer for exynos-mixer is added in patch 5/5,
> it is currently added only for exynos4412 and allows to address the
> mixer DMA underrun error issues [1].
> 
> Changes since v8:
>  - excluded from the series already applied dts patches, 
>  - Co-developed-by/Signed-off-by tag corrections, Ack tags added,
>  - the maintainers entry corrections adressing review comments,
>  - Kconfig/Makefile improvements/corrections,
>  - whitespace/indentation cleanup.
> 
> The series has been tested on Odroid U3 board. It is based on v5.10-rc1.
> 
> --
> Regards,
> Sylwester
> 
> Changes since v7:
>  - drivers/interconnect/exynos renamed to drivers/interconnect/samsung,
>  - added INTERCONNECT_SAMSUNG Kconfig symbol,
>  - added missing driver sync_state callback,
>  - improved the DT binding description,
>  - added a patch adding maintainers entry,
>  - updated comment in patch 7/7, typo fix (patch 1/7).
> 
> Changes since v6:
>  - the interconnect consumer DT bindings are now used to describe dependencies
>    of the interconnects (samsung,exynos-bus nodes),
>  - bus-width property replaced with samsung,data-clk-ratio,
>  - adaptation to recent changes in the interconnect code
>    (of_icc_get_from_provider(), icc_node_add()).
> 
> Changes since v5:
>  - addition of "bus-width: DT property, which specifies data width
>    of the interconnect bus (patches 1...2/6),
>  - addition of synchronization of the interconnect bandwidth setting
>    with VSYNC (patch 6/6).
> 
> Changes since v3 [4] (v4 skipped to align with patchset [1]), detailed
> changes are listed in patches:
>  - conversion to a separate interconnect (platform) driver,
>  - an update of the DT binding documenting new optional properties:
>    #interconnect-cells, samsung,interconnect-parent in "samsung,exynos-bus"
>    nodes,
>  - new DT properties added to the SoC, rather than to the board specific
>    files.
> 
> Changes since v2 [5]:
>  - Use icc_std_aggregate().
>  - Implement a different modification of apply_constraints() in
>    drivers/interconnect/core.c (patch 03).
>  - Use 'exynos,interconnect-parent-node' in the DT instead of
>    'devfreq'/'parent', depending on the bus.
>  - Rebase on DT patches that deprecate the 'devfreq' DT property.
>  - Improve error handling, including freeing generated IDs on failure.
>  - Remove exynos_bus_icc_connect() and add exynos_bus_icc_get_parent().
> 
> Changes since v1 [6]:
>  - Rebase on coupled regulators patches.
>  - Use dev_pm_qos_*() API instead of overriding frequency in
>    exynos_bus_target().
>  - Use IDR for node ID allocation.
>  - Reverse order of multiplication and division in
>    mixer_set_memory_bandwidth() (patch 07) to avoid integer overflow.
> 
> 
> References:
> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10861757/ (original issue)
> [2] https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=0c5b42ec-53c07bee-0c5ac9a3-0cc47a31381a-25eb9fb6f0f852e5&q=1&e=3074012f-8e28-49a9-9773-669dbeefe1a6&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.spinics.net%2Flists%2Flinux-samsung-soc%2Fmsg70014.html
> [3] https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=f3fdf673-ac66cf71-f3fc7d3c-0cc47a31381a-8ab39522e9fe68a8&q=1&e=3074012f-8e28-49a9-9773-669dbeefe1a6&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.spinics.net%2Flists%2Farm-kernel%2Fmsg810722.html
> [4] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20191220115653.6487-1-a.swigon@samsung.com
> [5] https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11054417/ (v1 of this RFC)
> [6] https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11152595/ (v2 of this RFC)
> 
> 
> Sylwester Nawrocki (5):
>   dt-bindings: devfreq: Add documentation for the interconnect
>     properties
>   interconnect: Add generic interconnect driver for Exynos SoCs
>   MAINTAINERS: Add entry for Samsung interconnect drivers
>   PM / devfreq: exynos-bus: Add registration of interconnect child
>     device
>   drm: exynos: mixer: Add interconnect support
> 
>  .../devicetree/bindings/devfreq/exynos-bus.txt     |  71 +++++++-
>  MAINTAINERS                                        |   8 +
>  drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c                       |  17 ++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_mixer.c              | 146 ++++++++++++++-
>  drivers/interconnect/Kconfig                       |   1 +
>  drivers/interconnect/Makefile                      |   1 +
>  drivers/interconnect/samsung/Kconfig               |  13 ++
>  drivers/interconnect/samsung/Makefile              |   4 +
>  drivers/interconnect/samsung/exynos.c              | 199 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  9 files changed, 450 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/interconnect/samsung/Kconfig
>  create mode 100644 drivers/interconnect/samsung/Makefile
>  create mode 100644 drivers/interconnect/samsung/exynos.c
> 

I checked that the icc patches were merged to icc.git.
So, I applied patch1 and patch4 to devfreq.git.


-- 
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel