From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15995C5519F for ; Sat, 14 Nov 2020 15:53:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FB7622254 for ; Sat, 14 Nov 2020 15:53:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="KP8t0StI"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Y71MEsMa" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 8FB7622254 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=Daa1kr+G24xUT/uBLdfkhZ2X0xa6p3Run4qCcPkYfmc=; b=KP8t0StIRudeF3rOWofO03q9h To6iQIa8hvtUzCqjgYPH3yYfcqwXvAaPpdaP1T0Dlf9zRjTta2gc9KXv1OYOmHjIaMR/ktDcLdK3H ikpB6oEy7dNzQnI6OVutgzJbjGZ6JB5oHURQc5XVr3G46Kg9PCjaXxe3V2yYBIdjaWvuxbQyhrPtO vaSOtCdJCikgKoJlczMiOUr1ZCjy0ec9LPb+EdGk82SfAXyrt7HJJvZ435340EB3dkrMDLzpIzpUb P8FPD8cpPI94JTV/sJJ6u+dsHvnrgJ7fPubbXUyYseCdAv7V5QdOqC8I8229FHpjKo8CKGmGJ+ilQ kIsqCOerg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kdxqw-0006OD-Rx; Sat, 14 Nov 2020 15:52:38 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kdxqt-0006Nn-S6 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Sat, 14 Nov 2020 15:52:37 +0000 Received: from archlinux (cpc149474-cmbg20-2-0-cust94.5-4.cable.virginm.net [82.4.196.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A65CE22254; Sat, 14 Nov 2020 15:52:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1605369154; bh=xk91UWzq0VQNigupjrFtq1zJtnXg2NTOQlVQGJW9XxE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Y71MEsMaltBMne/YYlSsmvOHnpYMiIbXL5MWltokzPlSW5tvCelbCR/ppwJEF/xoD IbWoeWqTUi61ZZ5yxAJe001/c0wqZGA71Vq77tsm8a4+3EmqL3YjRT2yBtO1mKhl0H 0oVVPd+1LiyEL+l86LWtiLlJROk9UQ7zAV45N45E= Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2020 15:52:28 +0000 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Fabrice Gasnier Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: adc: stm32-adc: adapt clock duty cycle for proper operation Message-ID: <20201114155228.5b78b7d6@archlinux> In-Reply-To: <0d7c4b81-3f4e-e952-892f-35296c87f987@st.com> References: <1604681846-31234-1-git-send-email-fabrice.gasnier@st.com> <20201108151835.5d78ebca@archlinux> <0d7c4b81-3f4e-e952-892f-35296c87f987@st.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.7 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20201114_105236_076550_4015FC44 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 30.34 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: olivier.moysan@st.com, alexandre.torgue@st.com, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 09:27:03 +0100 Fabrice Gasnier wrote: > On 11/8/20 4:18 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 17:57:26 +0100 > > Fabrice Gasnier wrote: > > > >> For proper operation, STM32 ADC should be used with a clock duty cycle > >> of 50%, in the range of 49% to 51%. Depending on the clock tree, divider > >> can be used in case clock duty cycle is out of this range. > >> In case clk_get_scaled_duty_cycle() returns an error, kindly apply a > >> divider by default (don't make the probe fail). > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Fabrice Gasnier > > Hi Fabrice, > > > > This sounds like it's a fix for a situation in which the device is not > > currently working? If so, please let me know a fixes tag. > > Hi Jonathan, > > That's a good point. I also thought about adding a fixes tag. Currently > I think this can't be hit upstream, as clock tree is tuned to fit duty > cycle constraints. So far, nobody seems to complain about it. So this > can probably go through the normal tree. > Applied. Will be interesting to see if the bot finds this one as a possible candidate for backports. I'll keep an eye on those coming through and suggest this isn't backported if it does show up. Thanks, Jonathan > Thanks, > Fabrice > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Jonathan > > > >> --- > >> drivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc-core.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++- > >> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc-core.c b/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc-core.c > >> index cd870c0..d64a9e8 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc-core.c > >> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc-core.c > >> @@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ static int stm32h7_adc_clk_sel(struct platform_device *pdev, > >> { > >> u32 ckmode, presc, val; > >> unsigned long rate; > >> - int i, div; > >> + int i, div, duty; > >> > >> /* stm32h7 bus clock is common for all ADC instances (mandatory) */ > >> if (!priv->bclk) { > >> @@ -226,6 +226,11 @@ static int stm32h7_adc_clk_sel(struct platform_device *pdev, > >> return -EINVAL; > >> } > >> > >> + /* If duty is an error, kindly use at least /2 divider */ > >> + duty = clk_get_scaled_duty_cycle(priv->aclk, 100); > >> + if (duty < 0) > >> + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "adc clock duty: %d\n", duty); > >> + > >> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(stm32h7_adc_ckmodes_spec); i++) { > >> ckmode = stm32h7_adc_ckmodes_spec[i].ckmode; > >> presc = stm32h7_adc_ckmodes_spec[i].presc; > >> @@ -234,6 +239,13 @@ static int stm32h7_adc_clk_sel(struct platform_device *pdev, > >> if (ckmode) > >> continue; > >> > >> + /* > >> + * For proper operation, clock duty cycle range is 49% > >> + * to 51%. Apply at least /2 prescaler otherwise. > >> + */ > >> + if (div == 1 && (duty < 49 || duty > 51)) > >> + continue; > >> + > >> if ((rate / div) <= priv->max_clk_rate) > >> goto out; > >> } > >> @@ -246,6 +258,10 @@ static int stm32h7_adc_clk_sel(struct platform_device *pdev, > >> return -EINVAL; > >> } > >> > >> + duty = clk_get_scaled_duty_cycle(priv->bclk, 100); > >> + if (duty < 0) > >> + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "bus clock duty: %d\n", duty); > >> + > >> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(stm32h7_adc_ckmodes_spec); i++) { > >> ckmode = stm32h7_adc_ckmodes_spec[i].ckmode; > >> presc = stm32h7_adc_ckmodes_spec[i].presc; > >> @@ -254,6 +270,9 @@ static int stm32h7_adc_clk_sel(struct platform_device *pdev, > >> if (!ckmode) > >> continue; > >> > >> + if (div == 1 && (duty < 49 || duty > 51)) > >> + continue; > >> + > >> if ((rate / div) <= priv->max_clk_rate) > >> goto out; > >> } > > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel