From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FSL_HELO_FAKE, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,HK_RANDOM_FROM,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6205AC388F9 for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 22:57:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFD9122453 for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 22:57:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="fyqLf9c8"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="C5BO4byd" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org EFD9122453 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=Sk7cVEt05c+XJWsGjqYm3fdY7tfaHMwbe9YydleY2SE=; b=fyqLf9c8jKv9ns5i4EwWYLbqg UXGEPzLntLdT4C+TbgAs+jIPMcCVonbrUz1GXFDhz0rBfdqVqvwLX/TbzJAxMTngUF5KIXwSCup6q KunGdPjGbiLvjd4I6Kp/svVzq5nhzdYXXXMiGGP/TOaJTcE0LtzzEgVJn+XsGZFN/llULgM3LqmNV jMNRLm6wGaNUIArIdux8WFbxJzHYIPKsjblMQHTuFgPUtQZfm6PY2ZTirbIXUB0NSmrzfsIhEfDBy WYB2fretsZOmn8hbLjUie3452P5CtvwUtAWCvd3JrFvSPqaf+FcDyIxV91uWlaN4/pjO05Eu5+0FF d1GvtTRhg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kenPy-0002ng-Oy; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 22:56:14 +0000 Received: from mail-pg1-x544.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::544]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kenPs-0002mm-PX for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 22:56:12 +0000 Received: by mail-pg1-x544.google.com with SMTP id f18so14544284pgi.8 for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 14:56:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=gGQQSbaDVAU1vlvpaceSFbxVHAcyF7FfLo2QxzhNlZQ=; b=C5BO4bydvajGP/mGvPihXiXvMZz2c7aB2Q3/MBFyIAVF1fF9Z7Y+ptE0UZdQCIEgr4 XNR8MhaFG7BMsU1sZ4/gk+083UDsxM+isovn//AV0yfa5S8+5BG75Ge4qFUtl8Fa4YVt c18UculviUHeSHWnXsfAl8PJN19H+J5DgTM2qg8Y2fJToREvKOApHYiPsDLWbcTFiCnE zy8TOc1ZBgvVfwaAlktxKmtwFg9meYy9Nfp5jGwABghRyQrBv6gX+N4MZqSvJe7Dz+00 YxouLtikATtKEOvPAT35JQvOpvocc1Paf045FoLgnyjw5o5qDdhAA3emZMfS1Q5N5FP7 4Isg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=gGQQSbaDVAU1vlvpaceSFbxVHAcyF7FfLo2QxzhNlZQ=; b=oY1oFTicmsbw1Tu6vR8q0OYCngmBIxg7gdhsUjegoW+uSo1YZIANEdyMWWv+c1ByO9 Md/w/kB9a3+UdpkaetsmZJeq/tvaRE6v8g0zXZ2rDanDRRaBv+lF3+oH3Lz/s2IpqDop iBp7+0CbLev01N+gBCrTUGPTziA2qYitbqqzT/3WDZmfrba/ieSnsLdGopTfqRXqW1LK xGiokYtNI1RmxE0qsQUR43il4VKWIQ1sBUtxJtgE4THYiVRmMO4nRtG1ApR3niNU4AHu bBVhOSEhk+y0/V998ai8RTgfCySKqw3ZBpjXpPgoyQs3be1A8uK+TAOwID9Q6aAZI3bJ prXw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530DMmHbijZHWLJsjEL6W5DwdJPJSIQ4nEYesVDl09i4D15zjurJ IyaLNkSG/1Zk2JYp6CRG6A7xZA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJygE31LfesK/DA/JPLBnwLWVO38gKqHhPhrl5ZibxECFESIHqyCO+iCX7y2d2GH7gdaLu4uyA== X-Received: by 2002:a63:581b:: with SMTP id m27mr1242198pgb.204.1605567360502; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 14:56:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from google.com (15.4.198.104.bc.googleusercontent.com. [104.198.4.15]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a17sm17007387pga.56.2020.11.16.14.55.59 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 16 Nov 2020 14:55:59 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 22:55:55 +0000 From: William Mcvicker To: Will Deacon Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Fix off-by-one vdso trampoline return value Message-ID: <20201116225555.GA160862@google.com> References: <20201112001422.340449-1-willmcvicker@google.com> <20201112101204.GA19506@willie-the-truck> <20201112185136.GA585063@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201112185136.GA585063@google.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20201116_175608_851164_DE4F5B95 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 34.79 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Catalin Marinas , Nick Desaulniers , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com, Andrei Vagin , Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@gmail.com>, Nathan Chancellor , Vincenzo Frascino , kernel-team@android.com, Thomas Gleixner , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi All, After digging into this even deeper with Nick, we found that the underlying issue is with ld.lld not carrying over the st_type for the VDSO_compat* symbol assignments in `arch/arm64/kernel/vdso32/vdso.lds.S`. >From my Android Common Kernel 4.19 build: $ llvm-readelf -s arch/arm64/kernel/vdso32/vdso.so.raw | grep thumb | sort 26: 0000094d 0 NOTYPE LOCAL DEFAULT 11 VDSO_compat_sigreturn_thumb 28: 00000955 0 NOTYPE LOCAL DEFAULT 11 VDSO_compat_rt_sigreturn_thumb 37: 0000094d 4 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 11 __kernel_sigreturn_thumb 38: 00000955 4 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 11 __kernel_rt_sigreturn_thumb 8: 0000094d 4 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 11 __kernel_sigreturn_thumb@@LINUX_2.6 9: 00000955 4 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 11 __kernel_rt_sigreturn_thumb@@LINUX_2.6 Fortunately, this has been fixed by llvm here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86263. So for kernels that use ld.lld and the VDSO compat sigreturn trampoline, they need to make sure to upgrade their toolchain. I hope this thread helps anyone running into this issue in the future. Thanks, Will On 11/12/2020, William Mcvicker wrote: > Hi Nick, > > Regarding llvm-nm, this extra thumb +1 is noticed after porting > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20201013033947.2257501-1-natechancellor@gmail.com/ > to the Android Common Kernel android-4.19-stable. I'm not sure why using ld.lld > causes this difference, but this proposed patch ensures that we don't rely on > the nm tool used. > > Will D., > Regarding applying this to some stable kernels vs backporting 2d071968a405 > ("arm64: compat: Remove 32-bit sigreturn code from the vDSO"), I am hesitant to > backport commit 2d071968a405 due it's dependencies. For 4.19 at least, I would > also need to backport these: > > 8e411be6aad13 will@kernel.org arm64: compat: Always use sigpage for sigreturn trampoline > a39060b009ca0 will@kernel.org arm64: compat: Allow 32-bit vdso and sigpage to co-exist > 1d09094aa6205 mark.rutland@arm.com arm64: vdso: use consistent 'map' nomenclature > d3418f3839b66 mark.rutland@arm.com arm64: vdso: use consistent 'abi' nomenclature > 3ee16ff3437ca mark.rutland@arm.com arm64: vdso: simplify arch_vdso_type ifdeffery > 74fc72e77dc5c mark.rutland@arm.com arm64: vdso: remove aarch32_vdso_pages[] > > I have done this in my local tree and verified it fixes the SIGBUS error I'm > seeing; however, it seems a lot cleaner and safer to just patch the VDSO_SYMBOL > macro. Please let me know what route you prefer. I'm happy to backport all of > these if that's the recommended approach. > > Thanks, > Will > > On 11/12/2020, Will Deacon wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 12:14:22AM +0000, Will McVicker wrote: > > > Depending on your host nm version, the generated header > > > `include/generated/vdso32-offsets.h` may have the bottom bit set for the > > > thumb vdso offset addresses (as observed when using llvm-nm). This > > > results in an additional +1 for thumb vdso trampoline return values > > > since compat_setup_return() already includes `vdso_trampoline + thumb`. > > > As a result, I see a SIGBUS error when running the LTP test > > > syscalls.rt_sigaction01. To fix this, let's clear the bottom bit of the > > > vdso_offset in the VDSO_SYMBOL macro. > > > > > > Test: LTP test syscalls.rt_sigaction01 > > > Fixes: f01703b3d2e6 ("arm64: compat: Get sigreturn trampolines from vDSO") > > > Signed-off-by: Will McVicker > > > --- > > > arch/arm64/include/asm/vdso.h | 2 +- > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/vdso.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/vdso.h > > > index f99dcb94b438..a7384379e8e1 100644 > > > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/vdso.h > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/vdso.h > > > @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ > > > > > > #define VDSO_SYMBOL(base, name) \ > > > ({ \ > > > - (void *)(vdso_offset_##name - VDSO_LBASE + (unsigned long)(base)); \ > > > + (void *)((vdso_offset_##name & ~1UL) - VDSO_LBASE + (unsigned long)(base)); \ > > > > I don't think we need this in mainline, because the sigreturn trampoline > > is just a bunch of .byte directives and I removed the sigreturn code from > > the compat vdso in 2d071968a405 ("arm64: compat: Remove 32-bit sigreturn code > > from the vDSO"). > > > > Might be needed in some stable kernels though (or we just backport the > > patch I mentioned above) > > > > Will _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel