From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5563C2D0E4 for ; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 14:50:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 452BD2075A for ; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 14:50:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="BaR/69sF"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="HBmYLN3X" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 452BD2075A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=brhNLrpHQ1yEyuUnjF+hh0qi5AWp81+DUsv7ot1WmFI=; b=BaR/69sFvoQEhZwY94xov89LV z8aGfHd6PXDhhe1+9mMHXkAz+SO7w7/fO+j+iTAq2h+pWF8wmnP9w9rDEI307Xwyd+if+b0w7W5E+ VSVW69dAG2O3qEd0MSAtp1XaXoTjedlaqrj0akpryiOVMGnUsS27Z2DZ+n0U8pr8PAxzI1QwlRE4u SK7LwiuDISn8M6t8l5j7rJ7Rgo5PiYsnBPm4FHnLrTHoI9V3riVrcJG9tSHFiFybK/pmE2Z8Qcmjt JWd8jVp2mY6QphGyepweZn5l4s7+Bv79PtrYlro1iPk+ojMa8RLftVqdpTU3IVH12xxFBvTOUphUS w1hazy8oA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1khD8r-0001sK-4c; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 14:48:33 +0000 Received: from mail-wr1-x441.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::441]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1khD8o-0001ra-DY for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 14:48:31 +0000 Received: by mail-wr1-x441.google.com with SMTP id g14so3656538wrm.13 for ; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 06:48:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=j3w1GqHE08GStM/FLoVxqtcruKl7crLd6tb2/zrsaZo=; b=HBmYLN3XpZuXc+k7o3oPHKUiBOVZVGKMLlUtlZYnuMYguOXjuS7k+Y3qtnx9wY/UmJ a5gcLYQmvATwN3KcQAL2GNy/JOUBnWvNttq0kl0MtuxVaT1Bset1PUM0wRQe7efukfH4 zFVekyFAz0HROoZGdmVZrLKicLJNXNXPLmsoyHkar8xpZZhnYl0sOLL5x4QQ+oK7ztYd kvnye4dIrZNljZ5iEWLH6DvobUmKXXjDrKJI3xeAdnQwFGCkrU0WlwNFUhpNbYI+t1t6 jOuSI9LT3vYQ+Qo/401gZ84DarbWpSFRzoImCb6m4AlMD+e6gX2ww5L5GHUZ/IyQPs0L Ro8w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=j3w1GqHE08GStM/FLoVxqtcruKl7crLd6tb2/zrsaZo=; b=rkE17z3xeRsDYQM2lrc8i0wDeaIJIe4OkgDsUHnP4KeTo35BVNC5q5vq9/qQJ5YHO8 0doLP8Y5KOGB0Qnv0QkxnDQrPPrjuV1bmHzPI7morcPWSKHq4zX7RmPebuz2BThaWD7C P3YasZ8WqustiScIn9b6vuI3+BABhmLSVZoMYJz0uAhgas/FPM3qUMbSh73CYhTBy+y/ sN+rVAav1pSD2SMdgfySAa/pfVM3d/CPEzBysMfE6f6GyBpY4SNzTAHZK7ryC4r/9VOR PSPnBgQl/fNazdoAZRHZGuy5jGsT8+YJKeDAfJsneauAbIza0AzgPZ26+7yUID5bQlp3 1vEw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531ce3/H9TtIuFQX34En7jKWWizv+eWmXPYJ+bxNCsbeHSufj0Fx nwZ27Ww/v9kkpa3f0IktVD0mZQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx6nTEwiFj8zZhxXBuJbb4oSybAB3dPrXTH+w6ewGwc/0dai1XkAj+mvfJ/6d3uF5/5kpr7Hw== X-Received: by 2002:adf:e481:: with SMTP id i1mr22651329wrm.282.1606142907911; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 06:48:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from google.com ([2a00:79e0:d:210:f693:9fff:fef4:a7ef]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x2sm19346846wru.44.2020.11.23.06.48.27 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 23 Nov 2020 06:48:27 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 14:48:24 +0000 From: Quentin Perret To: Will Deacon Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/14] sched: Introduce arch_cpu_allowed_mask() to limit fallback rq selection Message-ID: <20201123144824.GA586782@google.com> References: <20201113093720.21106-1-will@kernel.org> <20201113093720.21106-11-will@kernel.org> <20201119093850.GD2416649@google.com> <20201119110709.GD3946@willie-the-truck> <20201119203906.GA5099@willie-the-truck> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201119203906.GA5099@willie-the-truck> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20201123_094830_521702_1EA1F222 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.74 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier , kernel-team@android.com, Vincent Guittot , Juri Lelli , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Catalin Marinas , Johannes Weiner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Qais Yousef , Li Zefan , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Tejun Heo , Suren Baghdasaryan , Morten Rasmussen , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thursday 19 Nov 2020 at 20:39:07 (+0000), Will Deacon wrote: > Ah, so in doing this I realised I don't like arch_cpu_possible_mask() so > much because it makes it sound like a back-end to cpu_possible_mask, but > the two are really different things. > > arch_task_cpu_possible_mask() might work? Yes, making it explicit in the name that this is a task-specific thing doesn't hurt. Thanks, Quentin _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel