From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 633A1C2D0E4 for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 01:22:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1AB820728 for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 01:22:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="WUdrHchV"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="pDbjKt/K" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E1AB820728 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=ggDeoREtsQ/hr4gGwoTYhhbcshSHrlWVLObKqU+xucc=; b=WUdrHchVZgkqqEU21hAfKTQed AZYcRM5r+u1VLMJBBbdmP/gG6V///aH7J9wU+mYeD0Q891QIghF/7UJ9wbpURj/2DY9/mcuuXSyJt B+pwOYo8dTsTdjah+syijp9P5xlFIWE+OHPmlMd3twLekMpX8F6ooH97HeSe4jnFk7yRjlnTYR9RT uyfkDd/2J4OIsrWmyNttpnOkF7jwK2w7ixsmbXxWTdaJ1aQbBZo692BPSosremJscrBLh4F7v7J3W xOGLgjtxtjSsXPTKY66wsf9LOq6il9mGR4m67bQxsg0aF3KwyoAntUd4t82vp9GjGa6mMOAmQXhyg dBDn68A2g==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1khN1C-0008DX-Vq; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 01:21:19 +0000 Received: from fllv0015.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.141]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1khN18-0008D8-A2 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 01:21:16 +0000 Received: from fllv0035.itg.ti.com ([10.64.41.0]) by fllv0015.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 0AO1L15D118423; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 19:21:01 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1606180861; bh=wLuBWcTJuHH4uo4MpJn9xKHS6b81FGYIjtG5uZa0r9Q=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=pDbjKt/Kf4tmMtcT2rGFeHxxIT9m4QQnxVxj9Azx0wj2BAP6ULpJ74VMV0M7u+KJh GnzbvLKnlWEzdmZR/NSdLaPmJzRWRXjHKvM41YeEpExMuCkH4MWkcJRtwgd+EtLl68 9v4BipQ7MX48W9C+6by/B3XegrGexApvSfxe2GeQ= Received: from DLEE106.ent.ti.com (dlee106.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.36]) by fllv0035.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 0AO1L1Fc029858 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 23 Nov 2020 19:21:01 -0600 Received: from DLEE108.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.38) by DLEE106.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.36) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 19:21:00 -0600 Received: from lelv0327.itg.ti.com (10.180.67.183) by DLEE108.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.38) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 19:21:00 -0600 Received: from localhost (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by lelv0327.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 0AO1L0b4072324; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 19:21:00 -0600 Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 19:21:00 -0600 From: Nishanth Menon To: Sekhar Nori Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] arm64: dts: ti: k3: squelch warnings regarding no #address-cells for interrupt-controller Message-ID: <20201124012100.fq7w7bjxvewuhbt2@shirt> References: <20201117161942.38754-1-nsekhar@ti.com> <20201117161942.38754-3-nsekhar@ti.com> <20201118151259.kpag44djji4ssiup@eldest> <18e41dba-a3dd-308a-605e-63b76ca638e5@ti.com> <20201119132829.sr435jf6s4275q4i@boxlike> <313a9cd5-7411-4ae1-cde4-42a2c18d11e6@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <313a9cd5-7411-4ae1-cde4-42a2c18d11e6@ti.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20171215 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20201123_202114_592769_E6FE5A8D X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 17.34 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Device Tree Mailing List , Grygorii Strashko , Lokesh Vutla , Andre Przywara , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Faiz Abbas , Tero Kristo , Rob Herring , Linux ARM Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 09:45-20201123, Sekhar Nori wrote: > >> The main reason I commented - is hope to get some clarification from DT maintainers. > >> 90% of interrupt-controller nodes do not have #address-cells and I never seen in in GPIO nodes > >> (most often is present in PCI and GIC nodes). > >> and nobody seems fixing it. So, if we are going to move this direction it's reasonable to get clarification to be sure. > >> > >> And there is no "never" here - #address-cells always can be added if really required. > > > > > > OK - as a GPIO node, but as an interrupt-controller node, I was > > looking at [1] and wondering if that was the precedence. > > > > Yes, will be good to get direction from the DT maintainers on this > > topic. > > Shall I respin this series with 2/4 dropped while we wait for decision > on this? > > #address-cells warnings on interrupt controller can perhaps be handled > all at once (there are many of those in existing DT anyway). > > GPIO is basic support and holds up many other modules (like MMC/SD). There are'nt too many new patches in my queue that depends on GPIO, I'd rather not introduce new warnings unless we are completely at a stalemate. I'd rather use this opportunity to understand where what we need to be doing. -- Regards, Nishanth Menon Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel