From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F59EC56201 for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 21:44:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F4E9206E5 for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 21:44:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="vJjVuvOV"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="2o5Kf7D1" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 9F4E9206E5 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=uBLDdmOF9aLuXcr360r7v4rhwIQImKw19xbk/We67kA=; b=vJjVuvOVsjB2cEb5XWLR3TO5X ZlyuG8BL+cNxVwBIsO62BH7dM/qsZOhrgD3nnLc4iz9yHd4QaPxz4GmTZFnEvpcDXTXlrF/n6aSK2 kzum5bMe4gl2IDehI5SEUAGx2Pkz5xmtfAfEVEQhuWuR5wP7TNe2LjqljivDE0p1r+eBWA4c+hJcg 5mZzNaIx4b6BzLFJNv1bLCPyvHsfsfZaRFSKF9XiGTV9Qo6xxvPR1DoS+bbonoo4gMJaO33zUYJJT ex1VjvWfuZtLrVWhsG0zBtynKgIkuPsUKXTBslzaytx1+4gEvF31KxiTdNo51n2/eGCrpQTPTkspn CWoVMVSuA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1khg6A-0005H8-3r; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 21:43:42 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1khg67-0005GV-LI for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 21:43:40 +0000 Received: from willie-the-truck (236.31.169.217.in-addr.arpa [217.169.31.236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 59B54206E5; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 21:43:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1606254218; bh=i6hbvXSQGJaCxcemC8oeN03qQ1XDrz8RB9bbPy6ICHk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=2o5Kf7D1A5gTiV8Nhz1O+8BEQi/wWC34FzTS5PI3TQQZffxbXmWetS43a7L52YofA KWSYuuapjz1kmlStNLltWbt79U8cNM/VUtLsX7fa9Zj5pHGuEU8z8L2GSmtyFijpKM mFULM7VSP0LZjXlRQml8/M2XHFMwVBmMHN4lmqng= Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 21:43:33 +0000 From: Will Deacon To: Rob Clark Subject: Re: [PATCHv8 0/8] System Cache support for GPU and required SMMU support Message-ID: <20201124214332.GC14252@willie-the-truck> References: <20201123152146.GE11033@willie-the-truck> <50b68f2bdf9413b896fbe816ba4ddbc9@codeaurora.org> <1c665e33d1d27263fb5056c16d30b827@codeaurora.org> <20201124111027.GA13151@willie-the-truck> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20201124_164339_806338_FC5F3520 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 25.73 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Sai Prakash Ranjan , Robin Murphy , Joerg Roedel , Akhil P Oommen , dri-devel , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Jordan Crouse , "list@263.net:IOMMU DRIVERS , Joerg Roedel , " , "Kristian H . Kristensen" , linux-arm-msm , Dave Airlie , freedreno , "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 11:05:39AM -0800, Rob Clark wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 3:10 AM Will Deacon wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 09:32:54AM +0530, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote: > > > On 2020-11-24 00:52, Rob Clark wrote: > > > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 9:01 AM Sai Prakash Ranjan > > > > wrote: > > > > > On 2020-11-23 20:51, Will Deacon wrote: > > > > > > Modulo some minor comments I've made, this looks good to me. What is > > > > > > the > > > > > > plan for merging it? I can take the IOMMU parts, but patches 4-6 touch > > > > > > the > > > > > > MSM GPU driver and I'd like to avoid conflicts with that. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > SMMU bits are pretty much independent and GPU relies on the domain > > > > > attribute > > > > > and the quirk exposed, so as long as SMMU changes go in first it > > > > > should > > > > > be good. > > > > > Rob? > > > > > > > > I suppose one option would be to split out the patch that adds the > > > > attribute into it's own patch, and merge that both thru drm and iommu? > > > > > > > > > > Ok I can split out domain attr and quirk into its own patch if Will is > > > fine with that approach. > > > > Why don't I just queue the first two patches on their own branch and we > > both pull that? > > Ok, that works for me. I normally base msm-next on -rc1 but I guess > as long as we base the branch on the older or our two -next branches, > that should work out nicely Turns out we're getting a v10 of Sai's stuff, so I've asked him to split patch two up anyway. Then I'll make a branch based on -rc1 that we can both pull. Will _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel