* [PATCH] bus: sunxi-rsb: make remove callback return void
@ 2020-11-26 7:41 Uwe Kleine-König
2020-11-26 7:55 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Uwe Kleine-König @ 2020-11-26 7:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Maxime Ripard
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, Chen-Yu Tsai, Mark Brown, linux-arm-kernel,
kernel
The driver core ignores the return value of struct device_driver::remove
because there is only little that can be done. To simplify the quest to
make this function return void, let struct sunxi_rsb_driver::remove
return void, too. All users already unconditionally return 0, this
commit makes this obvious and ensures future users don't behave
differently. To simplify even further, make axp20x_device_remove()
return void instead of returning 0 unconditionally, too.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
---
drivers/bus/sunxi-rsb.c | 4 +++-
drivers/mfd/axp20x-i2c.c | 4 +++-
drivers/mfd/axp20x-rsb.c | 4 ++--
drivers/mfd/axp20x.c | 4 +---
include/linux/mfd/axp20x.h | 2 +-
include/linux/sunxi-rsb.h | 2 +-
6 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/bus/sunxi-rsb.c b/drivers/bus/sunxi-rsb.c
index 1bb00a959c67..117716e23ffb 100644
--- a/drivers/bus/sunxi-rsb.c
+++ b/drivers/bus/sunxi-rsb.c
@@ -170,7 +170,9 @@ static int sunxi_rsb_device_remove(struct device *dev)
{
const struct sunxi_rsb_driver *drv = to_sunxi_rsb_driver(dev->driver);
- return drv->remove(to_sunxi_rsb_device(dev));
+ drv->remove(to_sunxi_rsb_device(dev));
+
+ return 0;
}
static struct bus_type sunxi_rsb_bus = {
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/axp20x-i2c.c b/drivers/mfd/axp20x-i2c.c
index 068e9c083f13..743e8338b0db 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/axp20x-i2c.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/axp20x-i2c.c
@@ -54,7 +54,9 @@ static int axp20x_i2c_remove(struct i2c_client *i2c)
{
struct axp20x_dev *axp20x = i2c_get_clientdata(i2c);
- return axp20x_device_remove(axp20x);
+ axp20x_device_remove(axp20x);
+
+ return 0;
}
static const struct of_device_id axp20x_i2c_of_match[] = {
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/axp20x-rsb.c b/drivers/mfd/axp20x-rsb.c
index 4cdc79f5cc48..214bc0d84d44 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/axp20x-rsb.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/axp20x-rsb.c
@@ -49,11 +49,11 @@ static int axp20x_rsb_probe(struct sunxi_rsb_device *rdev)
return axp20x_device_probe(axp20x);
}
-static int axp20x_rsb_remove(struct sunxi_rsb_device *rdev)
+static void axp20x_rsb_remove(struct sunxi_rsb_device *rdev)
{
struct axp20x_dev *axp20x = sunxi_rsb_device_get_drvdata(rdev);
- return axp20x_device_remove(axp20x);
+ axp20x_device_remove(axp20x);
}
static const struct of_device_id axp20x_rsb_of_match[] = {
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/axp20x.c b/drivers/mfd/axp20x.c
index aa59496e4376..3eae04e24ac8 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/axp20x.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/axp20x.c
@@ -987,7 +987,7 @@ int axp20x_device_probe(struct axp20x_dev *axp20x)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(axp20x_device_probe);
-int axp20x_device_remove(struct axp20x_dev *axp20x)
+void axp20x_device_remove(struct axp20x_dev *axp20x)
{
if (axp20x == axp20x_pm_power_off) {
axp20x_pm_power_off = NULL;
@@ -996,8 +996,6 @@ int axp20x_device_remove(struct axp20x_dev *axp20x)
mfd_remove_devices(axp20x->dev);
regmap_del_irq_chip(axp20x->irq, axp20x->regmap_irqc);
-
- return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(axp20x_device_remove);
diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/axp20x.h b/include/linux/mfd/axp20x.h
index fd5957c042da..9ab0e2fca7ea 100644
--- a/include/linux/mfd/axp20x.h
+++ b/include/linux/mfd/axp20x.h
@@ -696,6 +696,6 @@ int axp20x_device_probe(struct axp20x_dev *axp20x);
*
* This tells the axp20x core to remove the associated mfd devices
*/
-int axp20x_device_remove(struct axp20x_dev *axp20x);
+void axp20x_device_remove(struct axp20x_dev *axp20x);
#endif /* __LINUX_MFD_AXP20X_H */
diff --git a/include/linux/sunxi-rsb.h b/include/linux/sunxi-rsb.h
index 7e75bb0346d0..bf0d365f471c 100644
--- a/include/linux/sunxi-rsb.h
+++ b/include/linux/sunxi-rsb.h
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ static inline void sunxi_rsb_device_set_drvdata(struct sunxi_rsb_device *rdev,
struct sunxi_rsb_driver {
struct device_driver driver;
int (*probe)(struct sunxi_rsb_device *rdev);
- int (*remove)(struct sunxi_rsb_device *rdev);
+ void (*remove)(struct sunxi_rsb_device *rdev);
};
static inline struct sunxi_rsb_driver *to_sunxi_rsb_driver(struct device_driver *d)
--
2.29.2
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] bus: sunxi-rsb: make remove callback return void
2020-11-26 7:41 [PATCH] bus: sunxi-rsb: make remove callback return void Uwe Kleine-König
@ 2020-11-26 7:55 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2020-11-26 8:03 ` Lee Jones
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Chen-Yu Tsai @ 2020-11-26 7:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Uwe Kleine-König
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, Mark Brown, Sascha Hauer, Maxime Ripard,
Lee Jones, linux-arm-kernel
On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 3:41 PM Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> wrote:
>
> The driver core ignores the return value of struct device_driver::remove
> because there is only little that can be done. To simplify the quest to
> make this function return void, let struct sunxi_rsb_driver::remove
> return void, too. All users already unconditionally return 0, this
> commit makes this obvious and ensures future users don't behave
> differently. To simplify even further, make axp20x_device_remove()
> return void instead of returning 0 unconditionally, too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
Since this touches the mfd tree as well, we either need an Ack from Lee,
the mfd maintainer (CC-ed), or let Lee take it in his tree. For the latter,
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
AFAIK we (sunxi) don't have anything regarding RSB queued up, so there
won't be any conflicts.
Regards
ChenYu
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] bus: sunxi-rsb: make remove callback return void
2020-11-26 7:55 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
@ 2020-11-26 8:03 ` Lee Jones
2020-11-26 10:35 ` Uwe Kleine-König
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Lee Jones @ 2020-11-26 8:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chen-Yu Tsai
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, Mark Brown, Sascha Hauer,
Uwe Kleine-König, Maxime Ripard, linux-arm-kernel
On Thu, 26 Nov 2020, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 3:41 PM Uwe Kleine-König
> <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> >
> > The driver core ignores the return value of struct device_driver::remove
> > because there is only little that can be done. To simplify the quest to
> > make this function return void, let struct sunxi_rsb_driver::remove
> > return void, too. All users already unconditionally return 0, this
> > commit makes this obvious and ensures future users don't behave
> > differently. To simplify even further, make axp20x_device_remove()
> > return void instead of returning 0 unconditionally, too.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
>
> Looks good to me.
>
> Reviewed-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
>
> Since this touches the mfd tree as well, we either need an Ack from Lee,
> the mfd maintainer (CC-ed), or let Lee take it in his tree. For the latter,
Right. Thank you Chen-Yu.
Uwe, did you run get_maintainer.pl?
Please re-submit this with the proper people on Cc.
> Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
>
> AFAIK we (sunxi) don't have anything regarding RSB queued up, so there
> won't be any conflicts.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] bus: sunxi-rsb: make remove callback return void
2020-11-26 8:03 ` Lee Jones
@ 2020-11-26 10:35 ` Uwe Kleine-König
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Uwe Kleine-König @ 2020-11-26 10:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lee Jones
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, Chen-Yu Tsai, Mark Brown, Sascha Hauer,
Maxime Ripard, linux-arm-kernel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1521 bytes --]
On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 08:03:16AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Nov 2020, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 3:41 PM Uwe Kleine-König
> > <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> > >
> > > The driver core ignores the return value of struct device_driver::remove
> > > because there is only little that can be done. To simplify the quest to
> > > make this function return void, let struct sunxi_rsb_driver::remove
> > > return void, too. All users already unconditionally return 0, this
> > > commit makes this obvious and ensures future users don't behave
> > > differently. To simplify even further, make axp20x_device_remove()
> > > return void instead of returning 0 unconditionally, too.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> >
> > Looks good to me.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
> >
> > Since this touches the mfd tree as well, we either need an Ack from Lee,
> > the mfd maintainer (CC-ed), or let Lee take it in his tree. For the latter,
>
> Right. Thank you Chen-Yu.
>
> Uwe, did you run get_maintainer.pl?
I thought I did, but obviously I somehow failed. (I have an idea what
went wrong, but I spare you the details.)
> Please re-submit this with the proper people on Cc.
sure, sorry for my confusion.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-11-26 10:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-11-26 7:41 [PATCH] bus: sunxi-rsb: make remove callback return void Uwe Kleine-König
2020-11-26 7:55 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2020-11-26 8:03 ` Lee Jones
2020-11-26 10:35 ` Uwe Kleine-König
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).