From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: elver@google.com, paulmck@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, dvyukov@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] arm64: entry lockdep/rcu/tracing fixes
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 11:23:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201130112336.GF24098@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201126123602.23454-1-mark.rutland@arm.com>
Hi Mark,
Thanks for doing this.
On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 12:35:51PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Dmitry and Marco both reported some weirdness with lockdep on arm64 erroneously
> reporting the hardware IRQ state, and inexplicable RCU stalls:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/CACT4Y+aAzoJ48Mh1wNYD17pJqyEcDnrxGfApir=-j171TnQXhw@mail.gmail.com
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201119193819.GA2601289@elver.google.com
>
> Having investigated, I believe that this is largely down to the arm64 entry
> code not correctly managing RCU, lockdep, irq flag tracing, and context
> tracking. This series attempts to fix those cases, and I've Cc'd folk from the
> previous threads as a heads-up.
I've left some _minor_ comments on a few of the patches, and there was a
build failure in the SDEI code, as you know.
Please can you spin a quick v2 so that I can get this into linux-next
ASAP?
Cheers,
Will
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-30 11:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-26 12:35 [PATCH 00/11] arm64: entry lockdep/rcu/tracing fixes Mark Rutland
2020-11-26 12:35 ` [PATCH 01/11] arm64: syscall: exit userspace before unmasking exceptions Mark Rutland
2020-11-26 12:35 ` [PATCH 02/11] arm64: mark idle code as noinstr Mark Rutland
2020-11-26 12:35 ` [PATCH 03/11] arm64: entry: mark entry " Mark Rutland
2020-11-26 12:35 ` [PATCH 04/11] arm64: entry: move enter_from_user_mode to entry-common.c Mark Rutland
2020-11-26 12:35 ` [PATCH 05/11] arm64: entry: prepare ret_to_user for function call Mark Rutland
2020-11-26 12:35 ` [PATCH 06/11] arm64: entry: move el1 irq/nmi logic to C Mark Rutland
2020-11-26 12:35 ` [PATCH 07/11] arm64: entry: fix non-NMI user<->kernel transitions Mark Rutland
2020-11-30 11:22 ` Will Deacon
2020-11-26 12:35 ` [PATCH 08/11] arm64: ptrace: prepare for EL1 irq/rcu tracking Mark Rutland
2020-11-30 11:01 ` Will Deacon
2020-11-26 12:36 ` [PATCH 09/11] arm64: entry: fix non-NMI kernel<->kernel transitions Mark Rutland
2020-11-30 11:22 ` Will Deacon
2020-11-26 12:36 ` [PATCH 10/11] arm64: entry: fix NMI {user, kernel}->kernel transitions Mark Rutland
2020-11-26 18:41 ` [PATCH 10/11] arm64: entry: fix NMI {user,kernel}->kernel transitions Mark Rutland
2020-11-26 21:00 ` Will Deacon
2020-11-26 12:36 ` [PATCH 11/11] arm64: entry: fix EL1 debug transitions Mark Rutland
2020-11-30 11:23 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2020-11-30 12:03 ` [PATCH 00/11] arm64: entry lockdep/rcu/tracing fixes Marco Elver
2020-11-30 12:38 ` Mark Rutland
[not found] ` <20201130133245.GA1307615@elver.google.com>
2020-11-30 16:54 ` Mark Rutland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201130112336.GF24098@willie-the-truck \
--to=will@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox