public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Yanan Wang <wangyanan55@huawei.com>
Cc: jiangkunkun@huawei.com, Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	wangjingyi11@huawei.com, Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>,
	lushenming@huawei.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	yezengruan@huawei.com, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	yuzenghui@huawei.com, wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com,
	zhukeqian1@huawei.com,
	Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] KVM: arm64: Fix possible memory leak in kvm stage2
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 13:21:33 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201130132133.GA24837@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201130121847.91808-2-wangyanan55@huawei.com>

On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 08:18:45PM +0800, Yanan Wang wrote:
> When installing a new leaf pte onto an invalid ptep, we need to get_page(ptep).
> When just updating a valid leaf ptep, we shouldn't get_page(ptep).
> Incorrect page_count of translation tables might lead to memory leak,
> when unmapping a stage 2 memory range.

Did you find this by inspection, or did you hit this in practice? I'd be
interested to see the backtrace for mapping over an existing mapping.

> Signed-off-by: Yanan Wang <wangyanan55@huawei.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c | 7 ++++---
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
> index 0271b4a3b9fe..696b6aa83faf 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
> @@ -186,6 +186,7 @@ static bool kvm_set_valid_leaf_pte(kvm_pte_t *ptep, u64 pa, kvm_pte_t attr,
>  		return old == pte;
>  
>  	smp_store_release(ptep, pte);
> +	get_page(virt_to_page(ptep));

This is also used for the hypervisor stage-1 page-table, so I'd prefer to
leave this function as-is.

>  	return true;
>  }
>  
> @@ -476,6 +477,7 @@ static bool stage2_map_walker_try_leaf(u64 addr, u64 end, u32 level,
>  	/* There's an existing valid leaf entry, so perform break-before-make */
>  	kvm_set_invalid_pte(ptep);
>  	kvm_call_hyp(__kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa, data->mmu, addr, level);
> +	put_page(virt_to_page(ptep));
>  	kvm_set_valid_leaf_pte(ptep, phys, data->attr, level);
>  out:
>  	data->phys += granule;

Isn't this hunk alone sufficient to solve the problem?

Will

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-30 13:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-30 12:18 [RFC PATCH 0/3] Fix several bugs in KVM stage 2 translation Yanan Wang
2020-11-30 12:18 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] KVM: arm64: Fix possible memory leak in kvm stage2 Yanan Wang
2020-11-30 13:21   ` Will Deacon [this message]
2020-12-01  7:21     ` wangyanan (Y)
2020-12-01 14:16       ` Will Deacon
2020-12-01 17:19         ` wangyanan (Y)
2020-12-01 18:15           ` Will Deacon
2020-12-01 20:08             ` wangyanan (Y)
2020-11-30 12:18 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] KVM: arm64: Fix handling of merging tables into a block entry Yanan Wang
2020-11-30 13:34   ` Will Deacon
2020-11-30 15:24     ` wangyanan (Y)
2020-11-30 16:01       ` Will Deacon
2020-12-01  2:30         ` wangyanan (Y)
2020-12-01 13:46           ` Will Deacon
2020-12-01 14:05             ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-01 14:23               ` Will Deacon
2020-12-01 14:32                 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-01 14:11             ` wangyanan (Y)
2020-12-01 14:35               ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-01 17:20                 ` wangyanan (Y)
2020-12-01 18:17                   ` Will Deacon
2020-11-30 12:18 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] KVM: arm64: Add usage of stage 2 fault lookup level in user_mem_abort() Yanan Wang
2020-11-30 13:49   ` Will Deacon
2020-12-01  6:04     ` wangyanan (Y)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201130132133.GA24837@willie-the-truck \
    --to=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=gshan@redhat.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jiangkunkun@huawei.com \
    --cc=julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lushenming@huawei.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=qperret@google.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=wangjingyi11@huawei.com \
    --cc=wangyanan55@huawei.com \
    --cc=yezengruan@huawei.com \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    --cc=zhukeqian1@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox