From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Yanan Wang <wangyanan55@huawei.com>
Cc: jiangkunkun@huawei.com, Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
wangjingyi11@huawei.com, Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>,
lushenming@huawei.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
yezengruan@huawei.com, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
yuzenghui@huawei.com, wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com,
zhukeqian1@huawei.com,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] KVM: arm64: Fix possible memory leak in kvm stage2
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 13:21:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201130132133.GA24837@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201130121847.91808-2-wangyanan55@huawei.com>
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 08:18:45PM +0800, Yanan Wang wrote:
> When installing a new leaf pte onto an invalid ptep, we need to get_page(ptep).
> When just updating a valid leaf ptep, we shouldn't get_page(ptep).
> Incorrect page_count of translation tables might lead to memory leak,
> when unmapping a stage 2 memory range.
Did you find this by inspection, or did you hit this in practice? I'd be
interested to see the backtrace for mapping over an existing mapping.
> Signed-off-by: Yanan Wang <wangyanan55@huawei.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
> index 0271b4a3b9fe..696b6aa83faf 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
> @@ -186,6 +186,7 @@ static bool kvm_set_valid_leaf_pte(kvm_pte_t *ptep, u64 pa, kvm_pte_t attr,
> return old == pte;
>
> smp_store_release(ptep, pte);
> + get_page(virt_to_page(ptep));
This is also used for the hypervisor stage-1 page-table, so I'd prefer to
leave this function as-is.
> return true;
> }
>
> @@ -476,6 +477,7 @@ static bool stage2_map_walker_try_leaf(u64 addr, u64 end, u32 level,
> /* There's an existing valid leaf entry, so perform break-before-make */
> kvm_set_invalid_pte(ptep);
> kvm_call_hyp(__kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa, data->mmu, addr, level);
> + put_page(virt_to_page(ptep));
> kvm_set_valid_leaf_pte(ptep, phys, data->attr, level);
> out:
> data->phys += granule;
Isn't this hunk alone sufficient to solve the problem?
Will
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-30 13:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-30 12:18 [RFC PATCH 0/3] Fix several bugs in KVM stage 2 translation Yanan Wang
2020-11-30 12:18 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] KVM: arm64: Fix possible memory leak in kvm stage2 Yanan Wang
2020-11-30 13:21 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2020-12-01 7:21 ` wangyanan (Y)
2020-12-01 14:16 ` Will Deacon
2020-12-01 17:19 ` wangyanan (Y)
2020-12-01 18:15 ` Will Deacon
2020-12-01 20:08 ` wangyanan (Y)
2020-11-30 12:18 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] KVM: arm64: Fix handling of merging tables into a block entry Yanan Wang
2020-11-30 13:34 ` Will Deacon
2020-11-30 15:24 ` wangyanan (Y)
2020-11-30 16:01 ` Will Deacon
2020-12-01 2:30 ` wangyanan (Y)
2020-12-01 13:46 ` Will Deacon
2020-12-01 14:05 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-01 14:23 ` Will Deacon
2020-12-01 14:32 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-01 14:11 ` wangyanan (Y)
2020-12-01 14:35 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-01 17:20 ` wangyanan (Y)
2020-12-01 18:17 ` Will Deacon
2020-11-30 12:18 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] KVM: arm64: Add usage of stage 2 fault lookup level in user_mem_abort() Yanan Wang
2020-11-30 13:49 ` Will Deacon
2020-12-01 6:04 ` wangyanan (Y)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201130132133.GA24837@willie-the-truck \
--to=will@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jiangkunkun@huawei.com \
--cc=julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lushenming@huawei.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=qperret@google.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=wangjingyi11@huawei.com \
--cc=wangyanan55@huawei.com \
--cc=yezengruan@huawei.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
--cc=zhukeqian1@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox