From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DE8FC64E7B for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 14:31:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA84F206B6 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 14:31:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="trjdlhs3"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Y/UtU5s9" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org DA84F206B6 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=zwy+ZvhssfuUkBrWn1b5VBNNr7ipaPtdaBfJyDJTLiU=; b=trjdlhs3aiySA0IsrheSHz+RV r4dRjCF1yPsA+rxgNuEr3Zg+BbpzkDmSABOY+QlMM8q9nHC0q7fKmw/v15Wqkz5sbM/AfEF5B1XCM Vwc9JHXZcvDRm5rRj/ibf+JTYon1MaIXqt4ANhZpPvyUf4gLMiuxNH+0Wnb/umhCLVYT93ICHPo7c KMaMEIdIrZ6GsDaTt+BQEhWvy4WzcQvdMGMPnzq79NtQGaKrHIRoGjVlcb9GN4GxKvQMnty0fRBMw R9CdQ6NkYw1Gu6HgD41T6RlYUmeExtuFkRGc7ltFjH91zMf3fv+jAULtKufmpkiLBh3YFuwgpGyMn je48qAQkA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kjkBJ-0005wN-Nb; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 14:29:33 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kjkBE-0005uL-5S for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 14:29:28 +0000 Received: from dragon (80.251.214.228.16clouds.com [80.251.214.228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9AAFE20684; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 14:29:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1606746566; bh=4Bkq+wkg1FT3dpd82K8c4Joe5aGfJRX9UwPUxafFRUQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Y/UtU5s9oMuYQepwAHqZI7eQwB3OlRW3OxVd/FwIrdPOh5fUgkJrSZLxkiGxdBJiP zIZkOVLoHLivWXXq/0T+z0uu8EJyCHBlrVKC/sMgZ0p9lzDAt387YtviGCAuuf5OLJ 6EghO+4+YCWIM+IP6R/beqjDNOUwIWOE8Vyc+CSQ= Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 22:29:19 +0800 From: Shawn Guo To: Michael Walle Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: ls1028a: make the eMMC and SD card controllers use fixed indices Message-ID: <20201130142918.GJ4072@dragon> References: <71a86b0fbc95892f8fd240e0919e7e23@walle.cc> <3293d698bf26ecf08f22e7e2ffe55e74@walle.cc> <20201124103128.zucizod344dgme4o@skbuf> <20201124112822.2ui57jmoc73top35@skbuf> <31db48954bdf02fc0af73871043fc76b@walle.cc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <31db48954bdf02fc0af73871043fc76b@walle.cc> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20201130_092928_293657_779A895B X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.59 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Ulf Hansson , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ashish Kumar , Vladimir Oltean , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Adrian Hunter , Leo Li , Rob Herring , "Y.b. Lu" , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 09:25:23AM +0100, Michael Walle wrote: > We are going cirlces here. I guess Shawn (as the soc maintainer) has to > step in and decide if a common soc include should contain aliases for > nodes which are disabled. That is what it boils down to. > > All other arguments against having aliases in the common include can be > found in this thread. > > > Distros, bootloaders, and users' cases using fixed index before could > > avoid issues, and been used as they were. > > Nobody argue against having these alias. We are arguing against having > them in the common soc include. 342ab37ecaf8 ("arm64: dts: freescale: use fixed index mmcN for layerscape") is dropped from my tree. Shawn _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel