From: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>
To: <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>, <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
<avri.altman@wdc.com>, <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
<jejb@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: bjorn.andersson@linaro.org,
Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>,
alice.chao@mediatek.com, bvanassche@acm.org,
andy.teng@mediatek.com, cc.chou@mediatek.com,
chun-hung.wu@mediatek.com, kuohong.wang@mediatek.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nguyenb@codeaurora.org,
jiajie.hao@mediatek.com, cang@codeaurora.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, peter.wang@mediatek.com,
matthias.bgg@gmail.com, beanhuo@micron.com,
chaotian.jing@mediatek.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
asutoshd@codeaurora.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] scsi: ufs: Remove pre-defined initial voltage values of device powers
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2020 14:51:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201201065114.1001-1-stanley.chu@mediatek.com> (raw)
UFS specficication allows different VCC configurations for UFS devices,
for example,
(1). 2.70V - 3.60V (Activated by default in UFS core driver)
(2). 1.70V - 1.95V (Activated if "vcc-supply-1p8" is declared in
device tree)
(3). 2.40V - 2.70V (Supported since UFS 3.x)
With the introduction of UFS 3.x products, an issue is happening that
UFS driver will use wrong "min_uV-max_uV" values to configure the
voltage of VCC regulator on UFU 3.x products with the configuration (3)
used.
To solve this issue, we simply remove pre-defined initial VCC voltage
values in UFS core driver with below reasons,
1. UFS specifications do not define how to detect the VCC configuration
supported by attached device.
2. Device tree already supports standard regulator properties.
Therefore VCC voltage shall be defined correctly in device tree, and
shall not changed by UFS driver. What UFS driver needs to do is simply
enable or disable the VCC regulator only.
Similar change is applied to VCCQ and VCCQ2 as well.
Note that we keep struct ufs_vreg unchanged. This is allow vendors to
configure proper min_uV and max_uV of any regulators to make
regulator_set_voltage() works during regulator toggling flow.
Without specific vendor configurations, min_uV and max_uV will be NULL
by default and UFS core driver will enable or disable the regulator
only without adjusting its voltage.
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>
---
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd-pltfrm.c | 16 ----------------
1 file changed, 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd-pltfrm.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd-pltfrm.c
index a6f76399b3ae..09e2f04bf4f6 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd-pltfrm.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd-pltfrm.c
@@ -133,22 +133,6 @@ static int ufshcd_populate_vreg(struct device *dev, const char *name,
vreg->max_uA = 0;
}
- if (!strcmp(name, "vcc")) {
- if (of_property_read_bool(np, "vcc-supply-1p8")) {
- vreg->min_uV = UFS_VREG_VCC_1P8_MIN_UV;
- vreg->max_uV = UFS_VREG_VCC_1P8_MAX_UV;
- } else {
- vreg->min_uV = UFS_VREG_VCC_MIN_UV;
- vreg->max_uV = UFS_VREG_VCC_MAX_UV;
- }
- } else if (!strcmp(name, "vccq")) {
- vreg->min_uV = UFS_VREG_VCCQ_MIN_UV;
- vreg->max_uV = UFS_VREG_VCCQ_MAX_UV;
- } else if (!strcmp(name, "vccq2")) {
- vreg->min_uV = UFS_VREG_VCCQ2_MIN_UV;
- vreg->max_uV = UFS_VREG_VCCQ2_MAX_UV;
- }
-
goto out;
out:
--
2.18.0
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next reply other threads:[~2020-12-01 6:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-01 6:51 Stanley Chu [this message]
2020-12-01 7:01 ` [PATCH v2] scsi: ufs: Remove pre-defined initial voltage values of device powers Avri Altman
[not found] ` <c855aaeb419bc7c124889c5afb0cae71@codeaurora.org>
2020-12-02 8:22 ` Stanley Chu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201201065114.1001-1-stanley.chu@mediatek.com \
--to=stanley.chu@mediatek.com \
--cc=alice.chao@mediatek.com \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=andy.teng@mediatek.com \
--cc=asutoshd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \
--cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=cang@codeaurora.org \
--cc=cc.chou@mediatek.com \
--cc=chaotian.jing@mediatek.com \
--cc=chun-hung.wu@mediatek.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jiajie.hao@mediatek.com \
--cc=kuohong.wang@mediatek.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=nguyenb@codeaurora.org \
--cc=peter.wang@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox