From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD05BC64E8A for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 10:27:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CD0320770 for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 10:27:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="U66iB39P"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="dOpBlgKh" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 3CD0320770 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=Svhk37NA3ttw+MD3sqRouwgsi0lu5PRwHOreV6wS2Pc=; b=U66iB39PuAAx7dDUCLmxFUNJT RnSeTsBCmGodC9cLgOwKqDNoYDWcKT32eFXfL5ANdti4xOR8vVQBpygtXqqEzSvd2NzbEzPmMNiD+ 22MxPuBZ+N4EImU2vnwwUAc7AnAA/HiiKTnFeojXyiDFRvJMt5C1rvwnKHlIAmfnb5c0a/xj7g/pm wmY2QKUfBHvYE/faLzaH3wItdVzrlfuqv5hIZA8HbVfec2BMGcLXKUKeHISJxrtpOtie1nMsRpLUE 9E8Os9NbbHKIw0iafUcNT8Mwpu2cZKsyddzA4cxArzKpluqhmO6T8yK/BrtCcA0p8cpfoNwUMsJch rqfS0QpRw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kk2ru-0005g0-Ey; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 10:26:46 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kk2rq-0005eu-SJ for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 10:26:44 +0000 Received: from willie-the-truck (236.31.169.217.in-addr.arpa [217.169.31.236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C7C9E20770; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 10:26:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1606818401; bh=WRF8G1B5bgqIsOXwVAGY/7mjMvkaXT+aAFfofyG5E3o=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=dOpBlgKhJFHmurU3yQ8cz3LPsXuFROR5koSQWYhlolWD2N4puJu0GjHwHcxXbMJh/ nes+R5nR5sHv4lnTdbBIAz5w1p2sYOEGyccnDObyBDaRscsPIxvHl/1eNCIz9/vEdx +WYEteVWCGFNDmMpgBGxDECcd09A6iPlVhIyYT78= Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2020 10:26:36 +0000 From: Will Deacon To: Sami Tolvanen Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: scs: use vmapped IRQ and SDEI shadow stacks Message-ID: <20201201102636.GB26471@willie-the-truck> References: <20201124195940.27061-1-samitolvanen@google.com> <20201124195940.27061-3-samitolvanen@google.com> <20201130114940.GB24563@willie-the-truck> <20201201101819.GA26471@willie-the-truck> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201201101819.GA26471@willie-the-truck> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20201201_052643_202559_30084086 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 22.11 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Mark Rutland , Kees Cook , Ard Biesheuvel , Catalin Marinas , LKML , James Morse , linux-arm-kernel Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 10:18:19AM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 01:13:07PM -0800, Sami Tolvanen wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 3:49 AM Will Deacon wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 11:59:40AM -0800, Sami Tolvanen wrote: > > > > for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { > > > > - err = _init_sdei_stack(&sdei_stack_normal_ptr, cpu); > > > > - if (err) > > > > - break; > > > > - err = _init_sdei_stack(&sdei_stack_critical_ptr, cpu); > > > > - if (err) > > > > - break; > > > > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VMAP_STACK)) { > > > > + err = _init_sdei_stack(&sdei_stack_normal_ptr, cpu); > > > > + if (err) > > > > + break; > > > > + err = _init_sdei_stack(&sdei_stack_critical_ptr, cpu); > > > > + if (err) > > > > + break; > > > > + } > > > > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SHADOW_CALL_STACK)) { > > > > + err = _init_sdei_scs(&sdei_shadow_call_stack_normal_ptr, cpu); > > > > + if (err) > > > > + break; > > > > + err = _init_sdei_scs(&sdei_shadow_call_stack_critical_ptr, cpu); > > > > + if (err) > > > > + break; > > > > > > This looks ok to me, but I think it would be better to follow the same > > > approach as you have for the IRQ stacks and instead have a separate > > > init_sdei_scs() function (similarly for the free() path), which means > > > you can simply the IS_ENABLED() checks too. > > > > OK, I can change this in v3. It makes error handling in > > sdei_arch_get_entry_point() a bit more awkward though. We'll need > > something like this: > > > > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VMAP_STACK)) { > > if (init_sdei_stacks()) > > return 0; > > } > > > > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SHADOW_CALL_STACK)) { > > if (init_sdei_scs()) { > > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VMAP_STACK)) > > free_sdei_stacks(); > > return 0; > > } > > Can you push the IS_ENABLED() checks into their respective functions? > Then you can do something like: > > if (init_sdei_stacks()) > return 0; > > if (init_sdei_scs()) > goto out_free_stacks; > > ... > > out_free_stacks: > free_sdei_stacks(); > return 0; Wait, I see you already posted a v3. Maybe I can just hack this up on top... Will _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel