From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90C66C64E7A for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 19:05:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2A8120643 for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 19:05:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="O8/jGJs+" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E2A8120643 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=16f898PysGEBeDOujEtp/nKIBQfqw3pjG8FGlbEL+aM=; b=O8/jGJs+DUMUpTFy5uRE1F71l 4WJfbt/chSmgVdOZtsvsg/n8Pf1cqF1jRDj9NlL1DcDOTcfLBSgGJD565BWGXkTKgRycnmwL/RHOe KTFeZ16qdXHNS35AL+LwbGc6ZFZIgmUkr9VCbx6zmINoG3rgAV6lr/+7ZO8XU7Y3hwmQnOe4V3/Cm qv/XrgtE+noX2+lLqUAZ86yxhZ0Gj1S3P7Sm9WlhRLL/jgyyC85Sj2rUsBO/0qtPjh1l8WtiPMzy4 YdS7ZqTwz4DTGD5QBXfoZ7o0V4bQYRaxEAO2oYv7QeDuHLy6GMHE9bFPQNW6/k/PpOjOwAAfQNp6L XXMQV7H9g==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kkAwg-0001bN-Ll; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 19:04:14 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kkAwd-0001ac-3N for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 19:04:11 +0000 Received: from gaia (unknown [95.146.230.165]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 131DE20643; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 19:04:08 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2020 19:04:06 +0000 From: Catalin Marinas To: Jonathan Corbet Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: document /proc api for arm64 MTE vm flags Message-ID: <20201201190406.GC2502@gaia> References: <20201106101940.5777-1-szabolcs.nagy@arm.com> <20201120144408.GE24344@gaia> <20201120110003.5bba61d5@lwn.net> <20201120222413.GA28722@gaia> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201120222413.GA28722@gaia> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20201201_140411_234274_1AA5FF8E X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 25.55 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Szabolcs Nagy , adobriyan@gmail.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Jon, On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 10:24:13PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 11:00:03AM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > > On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 14:44:09 +0000 > > Catalin Marinas wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 10:19:40AM +0000, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: > > > > Document that /proc/PID/smaps shows PROT_MTE settings in VmFlags. > > > > Support for this was introduced in > > > > > > > > commit 9f3419315f3cdc41a7318e4d50ba18a592b30c8c > > > > arm64: mte: Add PROT_MTE support to mmap() and mprotect() > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Szabolcs Nagy > > > > Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas > > > > Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org > > > > --- > > > > Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst | 1 + > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst > > > > index 533c79e8d2cd..e5fa972d4c76 100644 > > > > --- a/Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst > > > > +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst > > > > @@ -546,6 +546,7 @@ encoded manner. The codes are the following: > > > > nh no huge page advise flag > > > > mg mergable advise flag > > > > bt arm64 BTI guarded page > > > > + mt arm64 MTE allocation tags are enabled > > > > == ======================================= > > > > > > > > Note that there is no guarantee that every flag and associated mnemonic will > > > > > > Are you ok with picking up this patch (it can be left for 5.11) or > > > should I queue it in the arm64 tree? > > > > It wasn't sent to me, so it wasn't on my radar. Up to you, I'm happy to > > grab it if you'd prefer. > > Please do grab it. Thanks. In case it slipped through the cracks (I haven't seen it in -next). Otherwise I'll queue it sometime later this week for 5.11. Thanks. -- Catalin _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel