linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	kernel-team@android.com, Keqian Zhu <zhukeqian1@huawei.com>,
	Yanan Wang <wangyanan55@huawei.com>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] KVM: arm64: Fix memory leak on stage2 update of a valid PTE
Date: Fri,  4 Dec 2020 18:19:12 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201204181914.783445-2-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201204181914.783445-1-maz@kernel.org>

From: Yanan Wang <wangyanan55@huawei.com>

When installing a new leaf PTE onto an invalid ptep, we need to
get_page(ptep) to account for the new mapping.

However, simply updating a valid PTE shouldn't result in any
additional refcounting, as there is new mapping. This otherwise
results in a page being forever wasted.

Address this by fixing-up the refcount in stage2_map_walker_try_leaf()
if the PTE was already valid, balancing out the later get_page()
in stage2_map_walk_leaf().

Signed-off-by: Yanan Wang <wangyanan55@huawei.com>
[maz: update commit message, add comment in the code]
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201201201034.116760-2-wangyanan55@huawei.com
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c | 9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
index 0271b4a3b9fe..2beba1dc40ec 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
@@ -470,6 +470,15 @@ static bool stage2_map_walker_try_leaf(u64 addr, u64 end, u32 level,
 	if (!kvm_block_mapping_supported(addr, end, phys, level))
 		return false;
 
+	/*
+	 * If the PTE was already valid, drop the refcount on the table
+	 * early, as it will be bumped-up again in stage2_map_walk_leaf().
+	 * This ensures that the refcount stays constant across a valid to
+	 * valid PTE update.
+	 */
+	if (kvm_pte_valid(*ptep))
+		put_page(virt_to_page(ptep));
+
 	if (kvm_set_valid_leaf_pte(ptep, phys, data->attr, level))
 		goto out;
 
-- 
2.28.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-04 18:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-04 18:19 [GIT PULL] KVM/arm64 fixes for 5.10, take #5 Marc Zyngier
2020-12-04 18:19 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2020-12-04 18:19 ` [PATCH 2/3] KVM: arm64: Fix handling of merging tables into a block entry Marc Zyngier
2020-12-04 18:19 ` [PATCH 3/3] KVM: arm64: Add usage of stage 2 fault lookup level in user_mem_abort() Marc Zyngier
2020-12-06 10:56 ` [GIT PULL] KVM/arm64 fixes for 5.10, take #5 Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201204181914.783445-2-maz@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=wangyanan55@huawei.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=zhukeqian1@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).