From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96476C4361B for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 09:39:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C96A2388B for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 09:39:04 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 3C96A2388B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=MwTuoQw1Ql7okw8pXaP/Irm3GjPgFOIkMC8lCXKRG2w=; b=LqV/TViBkJ7gIwQrpnkTO+Zx5 Tkpi+JclRafbrvKEf+rqXIKY+AR1VNQH6btDMWp/6/s6USJeGdWLKmHGbbridAIqyVNcyzYYJ9Ymf txNTvLMfXSMPz48vpg/4eJV9USJKmDpYVEG0IMj1Wka/H1UK+B7EWRcdEnhRI9LJbLcQa6DhqEfSt 1lA8UAbS67OF657hOo48qxeQ7NPzAte+lkIoPoxbf1rsWTYKNPycBN28Z3CIDgwcR7qw2LT4H9eyv ADMdiq7c594KshXdDayG9MbvC5zIew/U4HQQH4Hw35uoahV57c1gTBdQhT07ifbIPnn1uYTFCXpOW vLlORnJ2A==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1knIOa-0007ez-7L; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 09:37:56 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1knIOW-0007eO-ED for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 09:37:53 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 942CA1FB; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 01:37:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from bogus (unknown [10.57.54.168]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9C9CF3F68F; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 01:37:47 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 09:37:44 +0000 From: Sudeep Holla To: Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: topology: Drop the useless update to per-cpu cycles Message-ID: <20201210093744.ienqd3aciv3oulag@bogus> References: <7a171f710cdc0f808a2bfbd7db839c0d265527e7.1607579234.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7a171f710cdc0f808a2bfbd7db839c0d265527e7.1607579234.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20171215 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20201210_043752_564213_44BC6672 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.05 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Vincent Guittot , Ionela Voinescu , Catalin Marinas , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sudeep Holla , Will Deacon , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 11:17:40AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > The previous call to update_freq_counters_refs() has already updated the > per-cpu variables, don't overwrite them with the same value again. > Good catch! Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla -- Regards, Sudeep _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel