From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@microchip.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] drivers: soc: atmel: Avoid calling at91_soc_init on non AT91 SoCs
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 10:31:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201211103143.1332302-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com> (raw)
Since at91_soc_init is called unconditionally from atmel_soc_device_init,
we get the following warning on all non AT91 SoCs:
" AT91: Could not find identification node"
Fix the same by filtering with allowed AT91 SoC list.
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Cc: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
---
drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c | 11 +++++++++++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c b/drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c
index c4472b68b7c2..ba9fc07cd91c 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c
@@ -271,8 +271,19 @@ struct soc_device * __init at91_soc_init(const struct at91_soc *socs)
return soc_dev;
}
+static const struct of_device_id at91_soc_allowed_list[] __initconst = {
+ { .compatible = "atmel,at91rm9200", },
+ { .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9260", },
+ { .compatible = "atmel,sama5d2", },
+};
+
static int __init atmel_soc_device_init(void)
{
+ struct device_node *np = of_find_node_by_path("/");
+
+ if (!of_match_node(at91_soc_allowed_list, np))
+ return 0;
+
at91_soc_init(socs);
return 0;
--
2.25.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next reply other threads:[~2020-12-11 10:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-11 10:31 Sudeep Holla [this message]
2020-12-11 11:45 ` [PATCH] drivers: soc: atmel: Avoid calling at91_soc_init on non AT91 SoCs Alexandre Belloni
2020-12-11 11:50 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-12-11 11:58 ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-12-11 12:14 ` Sudeep Holla
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201211103143.1332302-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ludovic.desroches@microchip.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox