public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@microchip.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: soc: atmel: Avoid calling at91_soc_init on non AT91 SoCs
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 12:45:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201211114515.GF1781038@piout.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201211103143.1332302-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com>

Hello,

On 11/12/2020 10:31:43+0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> Since at91_soc_init is called unconditionally from atmel_soc_device_init,
> we get the following warning on all non AT91 SoCs:
> 	" AT91: Could not find identification node"
> 
> Fix the same by filtering with allowed AT91 SoC list.
> 
> Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>
> Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
> Cc: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@microchip.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c | 11 +++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c b/drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c
> index c4472b68b7c2..ba9fc07cd91c 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c
> @@ -271,8 +271,19 @@ struct soc_device * __init at91_soc_init(const struct at91_soc *socs)
>  	return soc_dev;
>  }
>  
> +static const struct of_device_id at91_soc_allowed_list[] __initconst = {
> +	{ .compatible = "atmel,at91rm9200", },
> +	{ .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9260", },
> +	{ .compatible = "atmel,sama5d2", },

This is a very small subset of the supported SoCs. a proper list would
be:

atmel,at91rm9200
atmel,at91sam9
atmel,sama5
atmel,samv7


-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-11 11:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-11 10:31 [PATCH] drivers: soc: atmel: Avoid calling at91_soc_init on non AT91 SoCs Sudeep Holla
2020-12-11 11:45 ` Alexandre Belloni [this message]
2020-12-11 11:50   ` Sudeep Holla
2020-12-11 11:58     ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-12-11 12:14       ` Sudeep Holla

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201211114515.GF1781038@piout.net \
    --to=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ludovic.desroches@microchip.com \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox