[PATCH 1/3] drm: mxsfb: add i.MX6UL/i.MX6ULL to the list of supported SoCs in Kconfig

[PATCH 1/3] drm: mxsfb: add i.MX6UL/i.MX6ULL to the list of supported SoCs in Kconfig

[Sébastien Szymanski]

The eLCDIF controller is also present on i.MX6UL/i.MX6ULL SoCs so add
them in the Kconfig option description.

Signed-off-by: Sébastien Szymanski <sebastien.szymanski@armadeus.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/mxsfb/Kconfig | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mxsfb/Kconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/mxsfb/Kconfig
index 0143d539f8f8..a3730f52e6fa 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mxsfb/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mxsfb/Kconfig
@@ -17,6 +17,6 @@ config DRM_MXSFB
 	help
 	  Choose this option if you have an LCDIF or eLCDIF LCD controller.
 	  Those devices are found in various i.MX SoC (including i.MX23,
-	  i.MX28, i.MX6SX, i.MX7 and i.MX8M).
+	  i.MX28, i.MX6UL/i.MX6ULL, i.MX6SX, i.MX7 and i.MX8M).
 
 	  If M is selected the module will be called mxsfb.
-- 
2.26.2


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH 2/3] drm: mxsfb: add alpha plane support on i.MX6UL/i.MX6ULL

[Sébastien Szymanski]

The eLCDIF controller on i.MX6UL/i.MX6ULL supports the alpha plane too.
Enable it on these SoCs.

Signed-off-by: Sébastien Szymanski <sebastien.szymanski@armadeus.com>
---
While testing, I have noticed that the alpha plane works but
sometimes the framebuffer is shiftted to the right.
I tested with the following modetest command:

modetest -M mxsfb-drm -s 37@35:800x480 -P 33@35:800x480@AR24 -F smpte,plain

 drivers/gpu/drm/mxsfb/mxsfb_drv.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mxsfb/mxsfb_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mxsfb/mxsfb_drv.c
index 6faf17b6408d..95c35333c2d1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mxsfb/mxsfb_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mxsfb/mxsfb_drv.c
@@ -306,6 +306,7 @@ static const struct drm_driver mxsfb_driver = {
 static const struct of_device_id mxsfb_dt_ids[] = {
 	{ .compatible = "fsl,imx23-lcdif", .data = &mxsfb_devdata[MXSFB_V3], },
 	{ .compatible = "fsl,imx28-lcdif", .data = &mxsfb_devdata[MXSFB_V4], },
+	{ .compatible = "fsl,imx6ul-lcdif", .data = &mxsfb_devdata[MXSFB_V6], },
 	{ .compatible = "fsl,imx6sx-lcdif", .data = &mxsfb_devdata[MXSFB_V6], },
 	{ /* sentinel */ }
 };
-- 
2.26.2


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH 3/3] dt-bindings: mxsfb: add compatible for i.MX6UL/i.MX6ULL

[Sébastien Szymanski]

i.MX6UL/i.MX6ULL have eLCDIF controller, too.

Signed-off-by: Sébastien Szymanski <sebastien.szymanski@armadeus.com>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mxsfb.txt | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mxsfb.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mxsfb.txt
index c985871c46b3..6c1c4ad04b89 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mxsfb.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mxsfb.txt
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ New bindings:
 Required properties:
 - compatible:	Should be "fsl,imx23-lcdif" for i.MX23.
 		Should be "fsl,imx28-lcdif" for i.MX28.
+		Should be "fsl,imx6ul-lcdif" for i.MX6UL/i.MX6ULL.
 		Should be "fsl,imx6sx-lcdif" for i.MX6SX.
 		Should be "fsl,imx8mq-lcdif" for i.MX8MQ.
 - reg:		Address and length of the register set for LCDIF
-- 
2.26.2


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 3/3] dt-bindings: mxsfb: add compatible for i.MX6UL/i.MX6ULL

[Rob Herring]

On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 03:10:35PM +0100, Sébastien Szymanski wrote:
> i.MX6UL/i.MX6ULL have eLCDIF controller, too.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sébastien Szymanski <sebastien.szymanski@armadeus.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mxsfb.txt | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

This will need to be rebased on this:

https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20201007012438.27970-2-laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com/

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel