From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>,
Prasad Sodagudi <psodagud@codeaurora.org>,
Srinivas Ramana <sramana@codeaurora.org>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Ajay Patil <pajay@qti.qualcomm.com>,
kernel-team@android.com, David Brazdil <dbrazdil@google.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 09/21] arm64: cpufeature: Add global feature override facility
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 09:45:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210118094533.2874082-10-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210118094533.2874082-1-maz@kernel.org>
Add a facility to globally override a feature, no matter what
the HW says. Yes, this sounds dangerous, but we do respect the
"safe" value for a given feature. This doesn't mean the user
doesn't need to know what they are doing.
Nothing uses this yet, so we are pretty safe. For now.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 2 ++
arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----
2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
index 9a555809b89c..465d2cb63bfc 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
@@ -75,6 +75,8 @@ struct arm64_ftr_reg {
u64 sys_val;
u64 user_val;
const struct arm64_ftr_bits *ftr_bits;
+ u64 *override_val;
+ u64 *override_mask;
};
extern struct arm64_ftr_reg arm64_ftr_reg_ctrel0;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
index e99eddec0a46..aaa075c6f029 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -544,13 +544,17 @@ static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_raz[] = {
ARM64_FTR_END,
};
-#define ARM64_FTR_REG(id, table) { \
- .sys_id = id, \
- .reg = &(struct arm64_ftr_reg){ \
- .name = #id, \
- .ftr_bits = &((table)[0]), \
+#define ARM64_FTR_REG_OVERRIDE(id, table, v, m) { \
+ .sys_id = id, \
+ .reg = &(struct arm64_ftr_reg){ \
+ .name = #id, \
+ .ftr_bits = &((table)[0]), \
+ .override_val = v, \
+ .override_mask = m, \
}}
+#define ARM64_FTR_REG(id, table) ARM64_FTR_REG_OVERRIDE(id, table, NULL, NULL)
+
static const struct __ftr_reg_entry {
u32 sys_id;
struct arm64_ftr_reg *reg;
@@ -760,6 +764,7 @@ static void __init init_cpu_ftr_reg(u32 sys_reg, u64 new)
u64 strict_mask = ~0x0ULL;
u64 user_mask = 0;
u64 valid_mask = 0;
+ u64 override_val = 0, override_mask = 0;
const struct arm64_ftr_bits *ftrp;
struct arm64_ftr_reg *reg = get_arm64_ftr_reg(sys_reg);
@@ -767,9 +772,38 @@ static void __init init_cpu_ftr_reg(u32 sys_reg, u64 new)
if (!reg)
return;
+ if (reg->override_mask && reg->override_val) {
+ override_mask = *reg->override_mask;
+ override_val = *reg->override_val;
+ }
+
for (ftrp = reg->ftr_bits; ftrp->width; ftrp++) {
u64 ftr_mask = arm64_ftr_mask(ftrp);
s64 ftr_new = arm64_ftr_value(ftrp, new);
+ s64 ftr_ovr = arm64_ftr_value(ftrp, override_val);
+
+ if ((ftr_mask & override_mask) == ftr_mask) {
+ s64 tmp = arm64_ftr_safe_value(ftrp, ftr_ovr, ftr_new);
+ char *str = NULL;
+
+ if (ftr_ovr != tmp) {
+ /* Unsafe, remove the override */
+ *reg->override_mask &= ~ftr_mask;
+ *reg->override_val &= ~ftr_mask;
+ tmp = ftr_ovr;
+ str = "ignoring override";
+ } else if (ftr_new != tmp) {
+ /* Override was valid */
+ ftr_new = tmp;
+ str = "forced";
+ }
+
+ if (str)
+ pr_warn("%s[%d:%d]: %s to %llx\n",
+ reg->name,
+ ftrp->shift + ftrp->width - 1,
+ ftrp->shift, str, tmp);
+ }
val = arm64_ftr_set_value(ftrp, val, ftr_new);
--
2.29.2
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-18 9:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-18 9:45 [PATCH v4 00/21] arm64: Early CPU feature override, and applications to VHE, BTI and PAuth Marc Zyngier
2021-01-18 9:45 ` [PATCH v4 01/21] arm64: Fix labels in el2_setup macros Marc Zyngier
2021-01-18 11:13 ` David Brazdil
2021-01-18 9:45 ` [PATCH v4 02/21] arm64: Fix outdated TCR setup comment Marc Zyngier
2021-01-20 18:18 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-01-18 9:45 ` [PATCH v4 03/21] arm64: Turn the MMU-on sequence into a macro Marc Zyngier
2021-01-20 18:18 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-01-18 9:45 ` [PATCH v4 04/21] arm64: Provide an 'upgrade to VHE' stub hypercall Marc Zyngier
2021-01-18 11:25 ` David Brazdil
2021-01-24 18:44 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-18 9:45 ` [PATCH v4 05/21] arm64: Initialise as nVHE before switching to VHE Marc Zyngier
2021-01-18 9:45 ` [PATCH v4 06/21] arm64: Move VHE-specific SPE setup to mutate_to_vhe() Marc Zyngier
2021-01-18 9:45 ` [PATCH v4 07/21] arm64: Simplify init_el2_state to be non-VHE only Marc Zyngier
2021-01-18 9:45 ` [PATCH v4 08/21] arm64: Move SCTLR_EL1 initialisation to EL-agnostic code Marc Zyngier
2021-01-20 18:35 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-01-18 9:45 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2021-01-22 18:41 ` [PATCH v4 09/21] arm64: cpufeature: Add global feature override facility Catalin Marinas
2021-01-23 15:59 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2021-01-18 9:45 ` [PATCH v4 10/21] arm64: cpufeature: Use IDreg override in __read_sysreg_by_encoding() Marc Zyngier
2021-01-22 18:53 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-01-23 16:04 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2021-01-18 9:45 ` [PATCH v4 11/21] arm64: Extract early FDT mapping from kaslr_early_init() Marc Zyngier
2021-01-22 18:55 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-01-23 13:25 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-01-18 9:45 ` [PATCH v4 12/21] arm64: cpufeature: Add an early command-line cpufeature override facility Marc Zyngier
2021-01-18 13:07 ` David Brazdil
2021-01-23 13:23 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-01-23 13:43 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-01-24 16:21 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-18 9:45 ` [PATCH v4 13/21] arm64: Allow ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1.VH to be overridden from the command line Marc Zyngier
2021-01-23 14:04 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-01-18 9:45 ` [PATCH v4 14/21] arm64: Honor VHE being disabled from the command-line Marc Zyngier
2021-01-18 13:14 ` David Brazdil
2021-01-23 14:07 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-01-24 15:59 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-18 9:45 ` [PATCH v4 15/21] arm64: Add an aliasing facility for the idreg override Marc Zyngier
2021-01-18 13:18 ` David Brazdil
2021-01-24 19:01 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-23 14:12 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-01-18 9:45 ` [PATCH v4 16/21] arm64: Make kvm-arm.mode={nvhe, protected} an alias of id_aa64mmfr1.vh=0 Marc Zyngier
2021-01-23 14:15 ` [PATCH v4 16/21] arm64: Make kvm-arm.mode={nvhe,protected} " Catalin Marinas
2021-01-18 9:45 ` [PATCH v4 17/21] KVM: arm64: Document HVC_VHE_RESTART stub hypercall Marc Zyngier
2021-01-18 13:29 ` David Brazdil
2021-01-18 9:45 ` [PATCH v4 18/21] arm64: Move "nokaslr" over to the early cpufeature infrastructure Marc Zyngier
2021-01-18 14:46 ` David Brazdil
2021-01-24 18:41 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-23 14:19 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-01-18 9:45 ` [PATCH v4 19/21] arm64: cpufeatures: Allow disabling of BTI from the command-line Marc Zyngier
2021-01-23 14:24 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-01-18 9:45 ` [PATCH v4 20/21] arm64: Defer enabling pointer authentication on boot core Marc Zyngier
2021-01-23 14:26 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-01-18 9:45 ` [PATCH v4 21/21] arm64: cpufeatures: Allow disabling of Pointer Auth from the command-line Marc Zyngier
2021-01-23 14:28 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-01-18 14:54 ` [PATCH v4 00/21] arm64: Early CPU feature override, and applications to VHE, BTI and PAuth David Brazdil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210118094533.2874082-10-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dbrazdil@google.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jingzhangos@google.com \
--cc=julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=pajay@qti.qualcomm.com \
--cc=psodagud@codeaurora.org \
--cc=sramana@codeaurora.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).