linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>,
	Prasad Sodagudi <psodagud@codeaurora.org>,
	Srinivas Ramana <sramana@codeaurora.org>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Ajay Patil <pajay@qti.qualcomm.com>,
	kernel-team@android.com, David Brazdil <dbrazdil@google.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 09/21] arm64: cpufeature: Add global feature override facility
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 09:45:21 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210118094533.2874082-10-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210118094533.2874082-1-maz@kernel.org>

Add a facility to globally override a feature, no matter what
the HW says. Yes, this sounds dangerous, but we do respect the
"safe" value for a given feature. This doesn't mean the user
doesn't need to know what they are doing.

Nothing uses this yet, so we are pretty safe. For now.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h |  2 ++
 arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c      | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
index 9a555809b89c..465d2cb63bfc 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
@@ -75,6 +75,8 @@ struct arm64_ftr_reg {
 	u64				sys_val;
 	u64				user_val;
 	const struct arm64_ftr_bits	*ftr_bits;
+	u64				*override_val;
+	u64				*override_mask;
 };
 
 extern struct arm64_ftr_reg arm64_ftr_reg_ctrel0;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
index e99eddec0a46..aaa075c6f029 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -544,13 +544,17 @@ static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_raz[] = {
 	ARM64_FTR_END,
 };
 
-#define ARM64_FTR_REG(id, table) {		\
-	.sys_id = id,				\
-	.reg = 	&(struct arm64_ftr_reg){	\
-		.name = #id,			\
-		.ftr_bits = &((table)[0]),	\
+#define ARM64_FTR_REG_OVERRIDE(id, table, v, m) {		\
+		.sys_id = id,					\
+		.reg = 	&(struct arm64_ftr_reg){		\
+			.name = #id,				\
+			.ftr_bits = &((table)[0]),		\
+			.override_val = v,			\
+			.override_mask = m,			\
 	}}
 
+#define ARM64_FTR_REG(id, table) ARM64_FTR_REG_OVERRIDE(id, table, NULL, NULL)
+
 static const struct __ftr_reg_entry {
 	u32			sys_id;
 	struct arm64_ftr_reg 	*reg;
@@ -760,6 +764,7 @@ static void __init init_cpu_ftr_reg(u32 sys_reg, u64 new)
 	u64 strict_mask = ~0x0ULL;
 	u64 user_mask = 0;
 	u64 valid_mask = 0;
+	u64 override_val = 0, override_mask = 0;
 
 	const struct arm64_ftr_bits *ftrp;
 	struct arm64_ftr_reg *reg = get_arm64_ftr_reg(sys_reg);
@@ -767,9 +772,38 @@ static void __init init_cpu_ftr_reg(u32 sys_reg, u64 new)
 	if (!reg)
 		return;
 
+	if (reg->override_mask && reg->override_val) {
+		override_mask = *reg->override_mask;
+		override_val = *reg->override_val;
+	}
+
 	for (ftrp = reg->ftr_bits; ftrp->width; ftrp++) {
 		u64 ftr_mask = arm64_ftr_mask(ftrp);
 		s64 ftr_new = arm64_ftr_value(ftrp, new);
+		s64 ftr_ovr = arm64_ftr_value(ftrp, override_val);
+
+		if ((ftr_mask & override_mask) == ftr_mask) {
+			s64 tmp = arm64_ftr_safe_value(ftrp, ftr_ovr, ftr_new);
+			char *str = NULL;
+
+			if (ftr_ovr != tmp) {
+				/* Unsafe, remove the override */
+				*reg->override_mask &= ~ftr_mask;
+				*reg->override_val &= ~ftr_mask;
+				tmp = ftr_ovr;
+				str = "ignoring override";
+			} else if (ftr_new != tmp) {
+				/* Override was valid */
+				ftr_new = tmp;
+				str = "forced";
+			}
+
+			if (str)
+				pr_warn("%s[%d:%d]: %s to %llx\n",
+					reg->name,
+					ftrp->shift + ftrp->width - 1,
+					ftrp->shift, str, tmp);
+		}
 
 		val = arm64_ftr_set_value(ftrp, val, ftr_new);
 
-- 
2.29.2


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-01-18  9:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-18  9:45 [PATCH v4 00/21] arm64: Early CPU feature override, and applications to VHE, BTI and PAuth Marc Zyngier
2021-01-18  9:45 ` [PATCH v4 01/21] arm64: Fix labels in el2_setup macros Marc Zyngier
2021-01-18 11:13   ` David Brazdil
2021-01-18  9:45 ` [PATCH v4 02/21] arm64: Fix outdated TCR setup comment Marc Zyngier
2021-01-20 18:18   ` Catalin Marinas
2021-01-18  9:45 ` [PATCH v4 03/21] arm64: Turn the MMU-on sequence into a macro Marc Zyngier
2021-01-20 18:18   ` Catalin Marinas
2021-01-18  9:45 ` [PATCH v4 04/21] arm64: Provide an 'upgrade to VHE' stub hypercall Marc Zyngier
2021-01-18 11:25   ` David Brazdil
2021-01-24 18:44     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-18  9:45 ` [PATCH v4 05/21] arm64: Initialise as nVHE before switching to VHE Marc Zyngier
2021-01-18  9:45 ` [PATCH v4 06/21] arm64: Move VHE-specific SPE setup to mutate_to_vhe() Marc Zyngier
2021-01-18  9:45 ` [PATCH v4 07/21] arm64: Simplify init_el2_state to be non-VHE only Marc Zyngier
2021-01-18  9:45 ` [PATCH v4 08/21] arm64: Move SCTLR_EL1 initialisation to EL-agnostic code Marc Zyngier
2021-01-20 18:35   ` Catalin Marinas
2021-01-18  9:45 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2021-01-22 18:41   ` [PATCH v4 09/21] arm64: cpufeature: Add global feature override facility Catalin Marinas
2021-01-23 15:59   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2021-01-18  9:45 ` [PATCH v4 10/21] arm64: cpufeature: Use IDreg override in __read_sysreg_by_encoding() Marc Zyngier
2021-01-22 18:53   ` Catalin Marinas
2021-01-23 16:04     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2021-01-18  9:45 ` [PATCH v4 11/21] arm64: Extract early FDT mapping from kaslr_early_init() Marc Zyngier
2021-01-22 18:55   ` Catalin Marinas
2021-01-23 13:25   ` Catalin Marinas
2021-01-18  9:45 ` [PATCH v4 12/21] arm64: cpufeature: Add an early command-line cpufeature override facility Marc Zyngier
2021-01-18 13:07   ` David Brazdil
2021-01-23 13:23   ` Catalin Marinas
2021-01-23 13:43   ` Catalin Marinas
2021-01-24 16:21     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-18  9:45 ` [PATCH v4 13/21] arm64: Allow ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1.VH to be overridden from the command line Marc Zyngier
2021-01-23 14:04   ` Catalin Marinas
2021-01-18  9:45 ` [PATCH v4 14/21] arm64: Honor VHE being disabled from the command-line Marc Zyngier
2021-01-18 13:14   ` David Brazdil
2021-01-23 14:07   ` Catalin Marinas
2021-01-24 15:59     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-18  9:45 ` [PATCH v4 15/21] arm64: Add an aliasing facility for the idreg override Marc Zyngier
2021-01-18 13:18   ` David Brazdil
2021-01-24 19:01     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-23 14:12   ` Catalin Marinas
2021-01-18  9:45 ` [PATCH v4 16/21] arm64: Make kvm-arm.mode={nvhe, protected} an alias of id_aa64mmfr1.vh=0 Marc Zyngier
2021-01-23 14:15   ` [PATCH v4 16/21] arm64: Make kvm-arm.mode={nvhe,protected} " Catalin Marinas
2021-01-18  9:45 ` [PATCH v4 17/21] KVM: arm64: Document HVC_VHE_RESTART stub hypercall Marc Zyngier
2021-01-18 13:29   ` David Brazdil
2021-01-18  9:45 ` [PATCH v4 18/21] arm64: Move "nokaslr" over to the early cpufeature infrastructure Marc Zyngier
2021-01-18 14:46   ` David Brazdil
2021-01-24 18:41     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-23 14:19   ` Catalin Marinas
2021-01-18  9:45 ` [PATCH v4 19/21] arm64: cpufeatures: Allow disabling of BTI from the command-line Marc Zyngier
2021-01-23 14:24   ` Catalin Marinas
2021-01-18  9:45 ` [PATCH v4 20/21] arm64: Defer enabling pointer authentication on boot core Marc Zyngier
2021-01-23 14:26   ` Catalin Marinas
2021-01-18  9:45 ` [PATCH v4 21/21] arm64: cpufeatures: Allow disabling of Pointer Auth from the command-line Marc Zyngier
2021-01-23 14:28   ` Catalin Marinas
2021-01-18 14:54 ` [PATCH v4 00/21] arm64: Early CPU feature override, and applications to VHE, BTI and PAuth David Brazdil

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210118094533.2874082-10-maz@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dbrazdil@google.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jingzhangos@google.com \
    --cc=julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=pajay@qti.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=psodagud@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=sramana@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).