linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
Cc: Branislav Rankov <Branislav.Rankov@arm.com>,
	Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
	Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>,
	Evgenii Stepanov <eugenis@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/6] kasan: Add report for async mode
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 13:19:34 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210122131933.GD8567@gaia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210121163943.9889-4-vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>

On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 04:39:40PM +0000, Vincenzo Frascino wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/kasan.h b/include/linux/kasan.h
> index bb862d1f0e15..b0a1d9dfa85c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kasan.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kasan.h
> @@ -351,6 +351,8 @@ static inline void *kasan_reset_tag(const void *addr)
>  bool kasan_report(unsigned long addr, size_t size,
>  		bool is_write, unsigned long ip);
>  
> +void kasan_report_async(void);
> +
>  #else /* CONFIG_KASAN_SW_TAGS || CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS */
>  
>  static inline void *kasan_reset_tag(const void *addr)
> diff --git a/mm/kasan/report.c b/mm/kasan/report.c
> index 234f35a84f19..2fd6845a95e9 100644
> --- a/mm/kasan/report.c
> +++ b/mm/kasan/report.c
> @@ -358,6 +358,17 @@ void kasan_report_invalid_free(void *object, unsigned long ip)
>  	end_report(&flags);
>  }
>  
> +void kasan_report_async(void)
> +{
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
> +	start_report(&flags);
> +	pr_err("BUG: KASAN: invalid-access\n");
> +	pr_err("Asynchronous mode enabled: no access details available\n");
> +	dump_stack();
> +	end_report(&flags);
> +}

I think the kernel test robot complains that with KASAN_SW_TAGS and
HW_TAGS disabled, the kasan_report_async() prototype is no longer
visible but you still have the non-static function definition here. So
either move kasan_report_async() out of this #ifdef or add the #ifdef
around the function definition.

It looks like the original kasan_report() prototype is declared in two
places (second one in mm/kasan/kasan.h). I'd remove the latter and try
to have a consistent approach for kasan_report() and
kasan_report_async().

-- 
Catalin

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-01-22 13:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-21 16:39 [PATCH v5 0/6] arm64: ARMv8.5-A: MTE: Add async mode support Vincenzo Frascino
2021-01-21 16:39 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] arm64: mte: Add asynchronous " Vincenzo Frascino
2021-01-21 16:39 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] kasan: Add KASAN mode kernel parameter Vincenzo Frascino
2021-01-21 17:34   ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-01-22 11:25     ` Vincenzo Frascino
2021-01-21 16:39 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] kasan: Add report for async mode Vincenzo Frascino
2021-01-21 17:36   ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-01-22  2:45   ` kernel test robot
2021-01-22  2:46   ` kernel test robot
2021-01-22 13:19   ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2021-01-22 13:27     ` Vincenzo Frascino
2021-01-22 13:38       ` Vincenzo Frascino
2021-01-21 16:39 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] arm64: mte: Enable async tag check fault Vincenzo Frascino
2021-01-21 17:38   ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-01-22 11:24     ` Vincenzo Frascino
2021-01-22 11:58   ` Catalin Marinas
2021-01-21 16:39 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] arm64: mte: Expose execution mode Vincenzo Frascino
2021-01-21 17:41   ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-01-21 16:39 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] kasan: Forbid kunit tests when async mode is enabled Vincenzo Frascino
2021-01-21 17:40   ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-01-22 11:26     ` Vincenzo Frascino
2021-01-22 12:00     ` Catalin Marinas
2021-01-22  4:04   ` kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210122131933.GD8567@gaia \
    --to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=Branislav.Rankov@arm.com \
    --cc=andreyknvl@google.com \
    --cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=eugenis@google.com \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).