Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Rachel Sibley <rasibley@redhat.com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, Memory Management <mm-qe@redhat.com>,
	skt-results-master@redhat.com, Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com>,
	CKI Project <cki-project@redhat.com>,
	Xiaowu Wu <xiawu@redhat.com>, Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.11.0-rc4 (arm-next)
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 19:50:27 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210122195026.GF25471@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f9d423db-eb19-79b1-1ce1-32e6a8adbe0e@redhat.com>

On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 02:38:49PM -0500, Rachel Sibley wrote:
> On 1/22/21 9:57 AM, Rachel Sibley wrote:
> > On 1/22/21 6:49 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 04:46:27AM -0000, CKI Project wrote:
> > > > We ran automated tests on a recent commit from this kernel tree:
> > > > 
> > > >         Kernel repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git
> > > >              Commit: 3c50969f0be2 - Merge branches
> > > > 'for-next/from-tip/irq/urgent', 'for-next/misc',
> > > > 'for-next/perf', 'for-next/random', 'for-next/rng',
> > > > 'for-next/selftests', 'for-next/stacktrace', 'for-next/topology'
> > > > and 'for-next/vdso' into for-next/core
> > > > 
> > > > The results of these automated tests are provided below.
> > > > 
> > > >      Overall result: FAILED (see details below)
> > > >               Merge: OK
> > > >             Compile: OK
> > > >               Tests: FAILED
> > > > 
> > > > All kernel binaries, config files, and logs are available for download here:
> > > > 
> > > >    https://arr-cki-prod-datawarehouse-public.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=datawarehouse-public/2021/01/21/621932
> > > > 
> > > > One or more kernel tests failed:
> > > > 
> > > >      aarch64:
> > > >       ❌ LTP
> > > 
> > > Hmm, this seems to be as a result of this error:
> > > 
> > >       7    netns_breakns 1 TINFO: timeout per run is 0h 5m 0s
> > >       8    RTNETLINK answers: Operation not permitted
> > >       9    netns_breakns 1 TBROK: unable to create veth pair devices
> > >      10    Cannot find device "veth0"
> > > 
> > > (https://arr-cki-prod-datawarehouse-public.s3.amazonaws.com/datawarehouse-public/2021/01/21/621932/build_aarch64_redhat%3A1078955/tests/LTP/9444882_aarch64_1_containers.fail.log)
> > > 
> > > 
> > > which doesn't look immediately related to anything we've queued on the arm64
> > > side. CKI folks -- have you seen this failure anywhere else, and is it
> > > reproducible?
> > > 
> > 
> > The netns suite was recently rewritten upstream so most likely a result of an unstable test case, Li/Jan do you have more details ?
> > I'm attempting to reproduce it right now, will keep you you updated:
> 
> I was unable to reproduce this, so maybe a transient error ? I added this failure to have our bot triager monitor it,
> if it tags additional pipelines we can follow up and report and/or mask it going forward. Please feel free to ignore
> for now, thank you!

Cheers, Rachel. If it comes back _and_ we have patches which look
potentially relevant then I'll reply to see if you can help me with the
triage.

Thanks,

WIll

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-22 19:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-22  4:46 ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.11.0-rc4 (arm-next) CKI Project
2021-01-22 11:49 ` Will Deacon
2021-01-22 14:57   ` Rachel Sibley
2021-01-22 19:38     ` Rachel Sibley
2021-01-22 19:50       ` Will Deacon [this message]
2021-01-22 20:30         ` Rachel Sibley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210122195026.GF25471@willie-the-truck \
    --to=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=cki-project@redhat.com \
    --cc=jstancek@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=liwang@redhat.com \
    --cc=mm-qe@redhat.com \
    --cc=rasibley@redhat.com \
    --cc=skt-results-master@redhat.com \
    --cc=xiawu@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox