From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A7C6C433DB for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 16:02:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACADA207D2 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 16:02:36 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org ACADA207D2 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=Az33SDR1T4GBpyOUbq5TbJBcTZ7BPv7RxC7e43D3uGU=; b=ULrDYY8ZktdqGpBdesHCliJts aRmM9X5bxYtg2ndk0yfEulwyxu6FYseZe3SSR7CKx0Cd0vKXMqILErKnpv0LpKzI9kvj8kSi6zMpV JrB9OG3iNUxckAjXVURj40Lhehla3i9Yd8LTUCcNOeW8PffuzYhZLivdVHzQQO0rvQ1JkwLilJt4N l0btH2MHW6ME0jR86jxKbJljmimOYgx/kplRULs0pExSk+tZsQnq8FDNZcOFJqgPuSTqjiQ0xoPfm xch4183bBE6cbllo/COrNbpyRoYbduCeUVmJXsj5+DRXvyM2SakFhQ3mRADy7Ke8d3bQG90XG3A+d u0P69vovQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1l4nFj-000130-T2; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 16:01:07 +0000 Received: from fllv0016.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.142]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1l4nFg-000125-Tz for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 16:01:06 +0000 Received: from lelv0266.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.225]) by fllv0016.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 10RG10TT072838; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 10:01:00 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1611763260; bh=Be5ODq2t5RWXEBx8SdxPZbptUXJc8ygAvzl4Ubl8Ov4=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=O/H63GUXuBFOx4JKTUUgRnfTHC1OQKJEcc2lLuyMorOnskH8MYYOQd+xP2kKmSef+ 5RsId31EWqQ8EH4HiswaIS46uQQLvTjvS/AwgSIIkMouYHXUOlvP5xHKMTTqJKnMma r7LqwZgMWsJ4O6W5jIdIKKb04SdPXvoMpdbrjutw= Received: from DLEE107.ent.ti.com (dlee107.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.37]) by lelv0266.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 10RG0xbr039369 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 27 Jan 2021 10:00:59 -0600 Received: from DLEE104.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.34) by DLEE107.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.37) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 10:00:59 -0600 Received: from fllv0040.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.20) by DLEE104.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.34) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 10:00:59 -0600 Received: from localhost (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by fllv0040.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 10RG0x0Y012859; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 10:00:59 -0600 Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 10:00:59 -0600 From: Nishanth Menon To: Lokesh Vutla , Sekhar Nori , Rob Herring , Andre Przywara , Rob Herring Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] arm64: dts: ti: k3: squelch warnings regarding no #address-cells for interrupt-controller Message-ID: <20210127160059.xob2k57agzzgqaph@always> References: <20210121060305.29133-1-lokeshvutla@ti.com> <161131973654.21299.8023411678794984222.b4-ty@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <161131973654.21299.8023411678794984222.b4-ty@ti.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20171215 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210127_110105_088634_7CF08CFC X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 19.11 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Device Tree Mailing List , Grygorii Strashko , Linux ARM Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 06:49-20210122, Nishanth Menon wrote: > On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 11:33:05 +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote: > > With dtc 1.6.0, building TI device-tree files with W=2 results in warnings > > like below for all interrupt controllers. > > > > /bus@100000/bus@30000000/interrupt-controller1: Missing #address-cells in interrupt provider > > > > Fix these by adding #address-cells = <0>; for all interrupt controllers in > > TI device-tree files. Any other #address-cells value is really only needed > > if interrupt-map property is being used (which is not the case for existing > > TI device-tree files) > > Hi Lokesh Vutla, > > I have applied the following to branch ti-k3-next on [1]. > Thank you! > > [1/1] arm64: dts: ti: k3: squelch warnings regarding no #address-cells for interrupt-controller > commit: 73d0af633c4bed02f8e71658c9e25ac8250b08c4 > > > All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next > tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent up the chain during > the next merge window (or sooner if it is a relevant bug fix), however if > problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted. [...] Lokesh, Based on discussion on [1] - looks like #address-cells = 0 usage is still to be resolved and needs some alignment between Andre and Rob on where to take this (dtc fixups to handle this Vs explicit #address-cells = 0 and increase in dtb size). I propose we drop this patch rather than having to revert this at a later point after I send a PR. Anyone has any objections? [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20210126163839.57491132@slackpad.fritz.box/ -- Regards, Nishanth Menon Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel