From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C65BC433DB for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 17:01:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7D1364E31 for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 17:01:52 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E7D1364E31 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=kNQWwNKf5aCIr28I1dIVjYq6AlISoNHJfveH/hune1I=; b=Tow95Kc0lqc5zsOSotc7zVTKu 7d7hFxu8emGAKlraXqA7wr8T+fvwL0ticUaYCWtcM2P0t4iIUWCZ3y9W5bexkL2c11D0FXdCfeSxK Exknv6M0kTz9++VmUv7Fo6LnX3K0EoazJLDyUyYtQXt01tozNwK6qHxqDU0PaAkI0Ooh+onEfTi25 EFmC0U/ykXUgOib9aNKWULjWHAzR59MalIlM7HCkrWkMk9arjH6lF0zXJ4NnslQzIdlPIF8spHr2g H8wzQPgq5xF67CQHuGY57y6h+lq/sSwe5quCTFv3QSzzRWi4bzdyezfOSTkUmexCrP6WrrjdtNxaz axRgPFtWg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1l9WNR-00033Q-3Y; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 17:00:37 +0000 Received: from mail-ot1-f47.google.com ([209.85.210.47]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1l9WNK-00030G-7q for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 17:00:32 +0000 Received: by mail-ot1-f47.google.com with SMTP id d7so15828037otq.6 for ; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 09:00:28 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=Y8TeBLOmzfFfpZzlPtDxoUFP64ezbCJGhYftb61vGiQ=; b=cM8F+/qyvGVuLbLogC7MOTcdCz7IldFppc5l2t6a28C5kvn6Kemvb/9v7ZiJZC8I1C KcMCWurm/xlGFZ8J+SZd3fLnVmgNR8YNL0TrvyUrQmQM7hCPUqyzEJzDzhi3CFlNwdz6 VZqjtyxxt+WlVrDSTWq8TX683Jio/EoaT3CxDiQLc6mowo9+YEbPbiCENwbTEqxB4T/0 YjX821sVsWr2tHfo9UzM1d6yBcdwjFOvpKhzvu4FcS3C1ajQs1cfttFkpOIsGwDgYvlm UZw5n/btZVeQiXX9IHZDVSoV6Up+ULlpHU6P2iEgPh9XpkBmC9HXqG2K+IepjLdN4Q/g RUQw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530YWt+s2TehdjWRa0bYttO6KGpwxBowP8fP3OTcRWn5Wx5iL5Gk KHBomePT+Ou4DfD1S0GAvQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwt1iqcyfLSNCa+WJl49vNU1QSnGo6FL49KCVk7vj1wWiZg4P85gMbMvxQ21AZMB3FNVw2lTA== X-Received: by 2002:a9d:5f05:: with SMTP id f5mr12390332oti.234.1612890027602; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 09:00:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from robh.at.kernel.org (24-155-109-49.dyn.grandenetworks.net. [24.155.109.49]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x7sm4329323oot.15.2021.02.09.09.00.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 09 Feb 2021 09:00:26 -0800 (PST) Received: (nullmailer pid 3932832 invoked by uid 1000); Tue, 09 Feb 2021 17:00:25 -0000 Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2021 11:00:25 -0600 From: Rob Herring To: Suman Anna Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: hwlock: Update OMAP HwSpinlock binding for AM64x SoCs Message-ID: <20210209170025.GA3927023@robh.at.kernel.org> References: <20210125235653.24385-1-s-anna@ti.com> <20210125235653.24385-2-s-anna@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210125235653.24385-2-s-anna@ti.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210209_120030_345418_FFB334D8 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 19.88 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Bjorn Andersson Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 05:56:52PM -0600, Suman Anna wrote: > Update the existing OMAP HwSpinlock binding to include the info for > AM64x SoCs. There are some minor IP integration differences between > the AM64x SoCs and the previous AM65x and J721E SoC families. A new > example is also added showcasing the difference in the IP's presence > on the interconnect. > > Signed-off-by: Suman Anna > --- > .../bindings/hwlock/ti,omap-hwspinlock.yaml | 26 +++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwlock/ti,omap-hwspinlock.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwlock/ti,omap-hwspinlock.yaml > index ac35491a6f65..ac146c0d628f 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwlock/ti,omap-hwspinlock.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwlock/ti,omap-hwspinlock.yaml > @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ properties: > enum: > - ti,omap4-hwspinlock # for OMAP44xx, OMAP54xx, AM33xx, AM43xx, DRA7xx SoCs > - ti,am654-hwspinlock # for K3 AM65x, J721E and J7200 SoCs > + - ti,am64-hwspinlock # for K3 AM64x SoCs > > reg: > maxItems: 1 > @@ -74,3 +75,28 @@ examples: > }; > }; > }; > + > + - | > + / { > + /* K3 AM64x SoCs */ > + model = "Texas Instruments K3 AM642 SoC"; > + compatible = "ti,am642-evm", "ti,am642"; > + #address-cells = <2>; > + #size-cells = <2>; > + > + bus@f4000 { > + compatible = "simple-bus"; > + #address-cells = <2>; > + #size-cells = <2>; > + ranges = <0x00 0x000f4000 0x00 0x000f4000 0x00 0x000002d0>, /* PINCTRL */ > + <0x00 0x01000000 0x00 0x01000000 0x00 0x02330400>, /* First peripheral window */ > + <0x00 0x0f000000 0x00 0x0f000000 0x00 0x00c44200>, /* Second peripheral window */ > + <0x00 0x20000000 0x00 0x20000000 0x00 0x0a008000>; /* Third peripheral window */ > + > + spinlock@2a000000 { Why are you doing the whole hierarchy here? Don't do that. In any case, a new compatible doesn't warrant a whole new example, so drop the example. > + compatible = "ti,am64-hwspinlock"; > + reg = <0x00 0x2a000000 0x00 0x1000>; > + #hwlock-cells = <1>; > + }; > + }; > + }; > -- > 2.29.2 > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel