Re: ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.11.0-rc7 (arm-next)

From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: CKI Project <cki-project@redhat.com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.11.0-rc7 (arm-next)
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 09:29:46 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210210092946.GA28560@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cki.8D1CB60FEC.K6NJMEFQPV@redhat.com>

Hi CKI folks,

Please can you help me with the error below?

On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 09:07:50PM -0000, CKI Project wrote:
> We ran automated tests on a recent commit from this kernel tree:
> 
>        Kernel repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git
>             Commit: 4176e42aa565 - Merge branch 'for-next/cpufeature' into for-kernelci
> 
> The results of these automated tests are provided below.
> 
>     Overall result: FAILED (see details below)
>              Merge: OK
>            Compile: OK
>              Tests: FAILED
> 
> All kernel binaries, config files, and logs are available for download here:
> 
>   https://arr-cki-prod-datawarehouse-public.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=datawarehouse-public/2021/02/09/623431
> 
> One or more kernel tests failed:
> 
>     aarch64:
>      ❌ Boot test

[...]

>     Host 2:
>        ❌ Boot test
>        ⚡⚡⚡ selinux-policy: serge-testsuite
>        ⚡⚡⚡ storage: software RAID testing
>        🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ xfstests - ext4
>        🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ xfstests - xfs
>        🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ xfstests - btrfs
>        🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ IPMI driver test
>        🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ IPMItool loop stress test
>        🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ Storage blktests
>        🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ Storage block - filesystem fio test
>        🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ Storage block - queue scheduler test
>        🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ Storage nvme - tcp
>        🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ Storage: swraid mdadm raid_module test
>        🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ stress: stress-ng

Which system (e.g. soc) is host 2 and are there are known infra issues at
the moment? I did push some changes which affect the early boot path, so we
may well be running into a kernel bug, but I'd just like to make sure before
we dive in trying to debug that, especially as we haven't seen failures on
other systems (and host 1 seems ok).

In the meantime, I'll push a new branch without those early changes to see
if that does any better.

Thanks,

Will

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel