From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
David Brazdil <dbrazdil@google.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>,
clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Andrew Scull <ascull@google.com>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] [RFC] arm64: enable HAVE_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 12:20:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210225112122.2198845-1-arnd@kernel.org> (raw)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
When looking at kernel size optimizations, I found that arm64
does not currently support HAVE_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION,
which enables the --gc-sections flag to the linker.
I see that for a defconfig build with llvm, there are some
notable improvements from enabling this, in particular when
combined with the recently added CONFIG_LTO_CLANG_THIN
and CONFIG_TRIM_UNUSED_KSYMS:
text data bss dec hex filename
16570322 10998617 506468 28075407 1ac658f defconfig/vmlinux
16318793 10569913 506468 27395174 1a20466 trim_defconfig/vmlinux
16281234 10984848 504291 27770373 1a7be05 gc_defconfig/vmlinux
16029705 10556880 504355 27090940 19d5ffc gc+trim_defconfig/vmlinux
17040142 11102945 504196 28647283 1b51f73 thinlto_defconfig/vmlinux
16788613 10663201 504196 27956010 1aa932a thinlto+trim_defconfig/vmlinux
16347062 11043384 502499 27892945 1a99cd1 gc+thinlto_defconfig/vmlinux
15759453 10532792 502395 26794640 198da90 gc+thinlto+trim_defconfig/vmlinux
I needed a small change to the linker script to get clean randconfig
builds, but I have not done any meaningful boot testing on it to
see if it works. If there are no regressions, I wonder whether this
should be autmatically done for LTO builds, given that it improves
both kernel size and compile speed.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAK8P3a05VZ9hSKRzVTxTn+1nf9E+gqebJWTj6N23nfm+ELHt9A@mail.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
arch/arm64/Kconfig | 1 +
arch/arm64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
index b94a678afce4..75e13cc52928 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
config ARM64
def_bool y
select ACPI_CCA_REQUIRED if ACPI
+ select HAVE_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION
select ACPI_GENERIC_GSI if ACPI
select ACPI_GTDT if ACPI
select ACPI_IORT if ACPI
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
index bad2b9eaab22..926cdb597a45 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
@@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ SECTIONS
INIT_CALLS
CON_INITCALL
INIT_RAM_FS
- *(.init.altinstructions .init.bss .init.bss.*) /* from the EFI stub */
+ *(.init.altinstructions .init.data.* .init.bss .init.bss.*) /* from the EFI stub */
}
.exit.data : {
EXIT_DATA
--
2.29.2
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next reply other threads:[~2021-02-25 11:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-25 11:20 Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2021-02-25 20:16 ` [PATCH] [RFC] arm64: enable HAVE_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION Kees Cook
2021-02-26 0:36 ` Sedat Dilek
2021-02-26 8:14 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-02-26 9:05 ` Sedat Dilek
2021-02-26 9:51 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-02-26 10:02 ` Sedat Dilek
2021-02-26 21:13 ` Fangrui Song
2021-02-27 9:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-01 1:11 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-03-10 20:49 ` Masahiro Yamada
2021-03-10 21:08 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-10 21:24 ` Sedat Dilek
2021-03-10 21:47 ` Nicolas Pitre
2021-03-10 21:57 ` Sedat Dilek
2021-03-10 22:02 ` Nick Desaulniers
2021-03-10 22:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2021-03-10 22:29 ` Fangrui Song
2021-03-10 21:45 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2021-03-10 21:19 ` Nicolas Pitre
2021-03-10 22:42 ` Fangrui Song
2021-03-17 14:37 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-03-17 16:18 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-03-18 8:41 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-19 12:25 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-03-19 14:01 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210225112122.2198845-1-arnd@kernel.org \
--to=arnd@kernel.org \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=ascull@google.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=dbrazdil@google.com \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=ionela.voinescu@arm.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kristina.martsenko@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).