Re: [PATCH v3 29/32] KVM: arm64: Wrap the host with a stage 2

Will Deacon
2021-03-05T19:31:11Z

On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 02:59:59PM +0000, Quentin Perret wrote:
> When KVM runs in protected nVHE mode, make use of a stage 2 page-table
> to give the hypervisor some control over the host memory accesses. The
> host stage 2 is created lazily using large block mappings if possible,
> and will default to page mappings in absence of a better solution.
>
> From this point on, memory accesses from the host to protected memory
> regions (e.g. marked PROT_NONE) are fatal and lead to hyp_panic().
>
> Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h | 1 +
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_cpufeature.h | 2 +
> arch/arm64/kernel/image-vars.h | 3 +
> arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 10 +
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/mem_protect.h | 34 +++
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/Makefile | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S | 1 +
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c | 11 +
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mem_protect.c | 213 ++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/setup.c | 5 +
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/switch.c | 7 +-
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/tlb.c | 4 +-
> 12 files changed, 286 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/mem_protect.h
> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mem_protect.c

[...]

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/mem_protect.h b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/mem_protect.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..d293cb328cc4
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/mem_protect.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2020 Google LLC
> + * Author: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef __KVM_NVHE_MEM_PROTECT__
> +#define __KVM_NVHE_MEM_PROTECT__
> +#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
> +#include <asm/kvm_hyp.h>
> +#include <asm/kvm_pgtable.h>
> +#include <asm/virt.h>
> +#include <nvhe/spinlock.h>
> +
> +struct host_kvm {
> + struct kvm_arch arch;
> + struct kvm_pgtable pgt;
> + struct kvm_pgtable_mm_ops mm_ops;
> + hyp_spinlock_t lock;
> +};
> +extern struct host_kvm host_kvm;
> +
> +int __pkvm_prot_finalize(void);
> +int kvm_host_prepare_stage2(void *mem_pgt_pool, void *dev_pgt_pool);
> +void handle_host_mem_abort(struct kvm_cpu_context *host_ctxt);
> +
> +static __always_inline void __load_host_stage2(void)
> +{
> + if (static_branch_likely(&kvm_protected_mode_initialized))
> + __load_stage2(&host_kvm.arch.mmu, host_kvm.arch.vtcr);
> + else
> + write_sysreg(0, vttbr_el2);

I realise you've just moved the code, but why is this needed? All we've
done is point the stage-2 ttb at 0x0 (i.e. we haven't disabled anything).

> +#endif /* __KVM_NVHE_MEM_PROTECT__ */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/Makefile b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/Makefile
> index e204ea77ab27..ce49795324a7 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/Makefile
> @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ lib-objs := $(addprefix ../../../lib/, $(lib-objs))
>
> obj-y := timer-sr.o sysreg-sr.o debug-sr.o switch.o tlb.o hyp-init.o host.o \
> hyp-main.o hyp-smp.o psci-relay.o early_alloc.o stub.o page_alloc.o \
> - cache.o cpufeature.o setup.o mm.o
> + cache.o cpufeature.o setup.o mm.o mem_protect.o
> obj-y += ../vgic-v3-sr.o ../aarch32.o ../vgic-v2-cpuif-proxy.o ../entry.o \
> ../fpsimd.o ../hyp-entry.o ../exception.o ../pgtable.o
> obj-y += $(lib-objs)
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S
> index f312672d895e..6fa01b04954f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-init.S
> @@ -119,6 +119,7 @@ alternative_else_nop_endif
>
> /* Invalidate the stale TLBs from Bootloader */
> tlbi alle2
> + tlbi vmalls12e1
> dsb sy
>
> /*
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c
> index ae6503c9be15..f47028d3fd0a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> #include <asm/kvm_hyp.h>
> #include <asm/kvm_mmu.h>
>
> +#include <nvhe/mem_protect.h>
> #include <nvhe/mm.h>
> #include <nvhe/trap_handler.h>
>
> @@ -151,6 +152,10 @@ static void handle___pkvm_create_private_mapping(struct kvm_cpu_context *host_ct
> cpu_reg(host_ctxt, 1) = __pkvm_create_private_mapping(phys, size, prot);
> }
>
> +static void handle___pkvm_prot_finalize(struct kvm_cpu_context *host_ctxt)
> +{
> + cpu_reg(host_ctxt, 1) = __pkvm_prot_finalize();
> +}
> typedef void (*hcall_t)(struct kvm_cpu_context *);
>
> #define HANDLE_FUNC(x) [__KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC_##x] = (hcall_t)handle_##x
> @@ -174,6 +179,7 @@ static const hcall_t host_hcall[] = {
> HANDLE_FUNC(__pkvm_cpu_set_vector),
> HANDLE_FUNC(__pkvm_create_mappings),
> HANDLE_FUNC(__pkvm_create_private_mapping),
> + HANDLE_FUNC(__pkvm_prot_finalize),
> };
>
> static void handle_host_hcall(struct kvm_cpu_context *host_ctxt)
> @@ -226,6 +232,11 @@ void handle_trap(struct kvm_cpu_context *host_ctxt)
> case ESR_ELx_EC_SMC64:
> handle_host_smc(host_ctxt);
> break;
> + case ESR_ELx_EC_IABT_LOW:
> + fallthrough;
> + case ESR_ELx_EC_DABT_LOW:
> + handle_host_mem_abort(host_ctxt);
> + break;
> default:
> hyp_panic();
> }
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mem_protect.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mem_protect.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..2252ad1a8945
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mem_protect.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,213 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2020 Google LLC
> + * Author: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
> +#include <asm/kvm_cpufeature.h>
> +#include <asm/kvm_emulate.h>
> +#include <asm/kvm_hyp.h>
> +#include <asm/kvm_mmu.h>
> +#include <asm/kvm_pgtable.h>
> +#include <asm/stage2_pgtable.h>
> +
> +#include <hyp/switch.h>
> +
> +#include <nvhe/gfp.h>
> +#include <nvhe/memory.h>
> +#include <nvhe/mem_protect.h>
> +#include <nvhe/mm.h>
> +
> +extern unsigned long hyp_nr_cpus;
> +struct host_kvm host_kvm;
> +
> +struct hyp_pool host_s2_mem;
> +struct hyp_pool host_s2_dev;
> +
> +static void *host_s2_zalloc_pages_exact(size_t size)
> +{
> + return hyp_alloc_pages(&host_s2_mem, get_order(size));
> +}
> +
> +static void *host_s2_zalloc_page(void *pool)
> +{
> + return hyp_alloc_pages(pool, 0);
> +}
> +
> +static int prepare_s2_pools(void *mem_pgt_pool, void *dev_pgt_pool)
> +{
> + unsigned long nr_pages, pfn;
> + int ret;
> +
> + pfn = hyp_virt_to_pfn(mem_pgt_pool);
> + nr_pages = host_s2_mem_pgtable_pages();
> + ret = hyp_pool_init(&host_s2_mem, pfn, nr_pages, 0);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + pfn = hyp_virt_to_pfn(dev_pgt_pool);
> + nr_pages = host_s2_dev_pgtable_pages();
> + ret = hyp_pool_init(&host_s2_dev, pfn, nr_pages, 0);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + host_kvm.mm_ops.zalloc_pages_exact = host_s2_zalloc_pages_exact;
> + host_kvm.mm_ops.zalloc_page = host_s2_zalloc_page;
> + host_kvm.mm_ops.phys_to_virt = hyp_phys_to_virt;
> + host_kvm.mm_ops.virt_to_phys = hyp_virt_to_phys;
> + host_kvm.mm_ops.page_count = hyp_page_count;
> + host_kvm.mm_ops.get_page = hyp_get_page;
> + host_kvm.mm_ops.put_page = hyp_put_page;

Same comment I had earlier on about struct initialisation -- I think you
can use the same trict here for the host_kvm.mm_ops.

> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void prepare_host_vtcr(void)
> +{
> + u32 parange, phys_shift;
> + u64 mmfr0, mmfr1;
> +
> + mmfr0 = arm64_ftr_reg_id_aa64mmfr0_el1.sys_val;
> + mmfr1 = arm64_ftr_reg_id_aa64mmfr1_el1.sys_val;
> +
> + /* The host stage 2 is id-mapped, so use parange for T0SZ */
> + parange = kvm_get_parange(mmfr0);
> + phys_shift = id_aa64mmfr0_parange_to_phys_shift(parange);
> +
> + host_kvm.arch.vtcr = kvm_get_vtcr(mmfr0, mmfr1, phys_shift);
> +}
> +
> +int kvm_host_prepare_stage2(void *mem_pgt_pool, void *dev_pgt_pool)
> +{
> + struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu = &host_kvm.arch.mmu;
> + int ret;
> +
> + prepare_host_vtcr();
> + hyp_spin_lock_init(&host_kvm.lock);
> +
> + ret = prepare_s2_pools(mem_pgt_pool, dev_pgt_pool);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = kvm_pgtable_stage2_init(&host_kvm.pgt, &host_kvm.arch,
> + &host_kvm.mm_ops);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + mmu->pgd_phys = __hyp_pa(host_kvm.pgt.pgd);
> + mmu->arch = &host_kvm.arch;
> + mmu->pgt = &host_kvm.pgt;
> + mmu->vmid.vmid_gen = 0;
> + mmu->vmid.vmid = 0;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int __pkvm_prot_finalize(void)
> +{
> + struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu = &host_kvm.arch.mmu;
> + struct kvm_nvhe_init_params *params = this_cpu_ptr(&kvm_init_params);
> +
> + params->vttbr = kvm_get_vttbr(mmu);
> + params->vtcr = host_kvm.arch.vtcr;
> + params->hcr_el2 |= HCR_VM;
> + if (cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_STAGE2_FWB))
> + params->hcr_el2 |= HCR_FWB;
> + kvm_flush_dcache_to_poc(params, sizeof(*params));
> +
> + write_sysreg(params->hcr_el2, hcr_el2);
> + __load_stage2(&host_kvm.arch.mmu, host_kvm.arch.vtcr);

AFAICT, there's no ISB here. Do we need one before the TLB invalidation?

> + __tlbi(vmalls12e1is);
> + dsb(ish);

Given that the TLB is invalidated on the boot path, please can you add
a comment here about the stale entries which you need to invalidate?

Also, does this need to be inner-shareable? I thought this function ran on
each CPU.

> + isb();
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void host_stage2_unmap_dev_all(void)
> +{
> + struct kvm_pgtable *pgt = &host_kvm.pgt;
> + struct memblock_region *reg;
> + u64 addr = 0;
> + int i;
> +
> + /* Unmap all non-memory regions to recycle the pages */
> + for (i = 0; i < hyp_memblock_nr; i++, addr = reg->base + reg->size) {
> + reg = &hyp_memory[i];
> + kvm_pgtable_stage2_unmap(pgt, addr, reg->base - addr);
> + }
> + kvm_pgtable_stage2_unmap(pgt, addr, ULONG_MAX);

Is this just going to return -ERANGE?

> +static int host_stage2_idmap(u64 addr)
> +{
> + enum kvm_pgtable_prot prot = KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_R | KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_W;
> + struct kvm_mem_range range;
> + bool is_memory = find_mem_range(addr, &range);
> + struct hyp_pool *pool = is_memory ? &host_s2_mem : &host_s2_dev;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (is_memory)
> + prot |= KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_X;
> +
> + hyp_spin_lock(&host_kvm.lock);
> + ret = kvm_pgtable_stage2_idmap_greedy(&host_kvm.pgt, addr, prot,
> + &range, pool);
> + if (is_memory || ret != -ENOMEM)
> + goto unlock;
> + host_stage2_unmap_dev_all();
> + ret = kvm_pgtable_stage2_idmap_greedy(&host_kvm.pgt, addr, prot,
> + &range, pool);

I find this _really_ hard to reason about, as range is passed by reference
and we don't reset it after the first call returns -ENOMEM for an MMIO
mapping. Maybe some commentary on why it's still valid here?

Other than that, this is looking really good to me.

Will