From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, maz@kernel.org, james.morse@arm.com,
julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
android-kvm@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@android.com, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, tabba@google.com,
mark.rutland@arm.com, dbrazdil@google.com, mate.toth-pal@arm.com,
seanjc@google.com, robh+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 12/32] KVM: arm64: Introduce a Hyp buddy page allocator
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2021 15:30:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210304153036.GA21507@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210302150002.3685113-13-qperret@google.com>
On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 02:59:42PM +0000, Quentin Perret wrote:
> When memory protection is enabled, the hyp code will require a basic
> form of memory management in order to allocate and free memory pages at
> EL2. This is needed for various use-cases, including the creation of hyp
> mappings or the allocation of stage 2 page tables.
>
> To address these use-case, introduce a simple memory allocator in the
> hyp code. The allocator is designed as a conventional 'buddy allocator',
> working with a page granularity. It allows to allocate and free
> physically contiguous pages from memory 'pools', with a guaranteed order
> alignment in the PA space. Each page in a memory pool is associated
> with a struct hyp_page which holds the page's metadata, including its
> refcount, as well as its current order, hence mimicking the kernel's
> buddy system in the GFP infrastructure. The hyp_page metadata are made
> accessible through a hyp_vmemmap, following the concept of
> SPARSE_VMEMMAP in the kernel.
>
> Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/gfp.h | 55 +++++++
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/memory.h | 28 ++++
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/Makefile | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/page_alloc.c | 195 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 279 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/gfp.h
> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/page_alloc.c
[...]
> +static void __hyp_attach_page(struct hyp_pool *pool,
> + struct hyp_page *p)
> +{
> + unsigned int order = p->order;
> + struct hyp_page *buddy;
> +
> + memset(hyp_page_to_virt(p), 0, PAGE_SIZE << p->order);
> +
> + /*
> + * Only the first struct hyp_page of a high-order page (otherwise known
> + * as the 'head') should have p->order set. The non-head pages should
> + * have p->order = HYP_NO_ORDER. Here @p may no longer be the head
> + * after coallescing, so make sure to mark it HYP_NO_ORDER proactively.
> + */
> + p->order = HYP_NO_ORDER;
> + for (; (order + 1) < pool->max_order; order++) {
> + buddy = __find_buddy_avail(pool, p, order);
> + if (!buddy)
> + break;
> +
> + /* Take the buddy out of its list, and coallesce with @p */
> + list_del_init(&buddy->node);
> + buddy->order = HYP_NO_ORDER;
> + p = (p < buddy) ? p : buddy;
nit: this is min()
> + }
> +
> + /* Mark the new head, and insert it */
> + p->order = order;
> + list_add_tail(&p->node, &pool->free_area[order]);
> +}
> +
> +static void hyp_attach_page(struct hyp_page *p)
> +{
> + struct hyp_pool *pool = hyp_page_to_pool(p);
> +
> + hyp_spin_lock(&pool->lock);
> + __hyp_attach_page(pool, p);
> + hyp_spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
> +}
> +
> +static struct hyp_page *__hyp_extract_page(struct hyp_pool *pool,
> + struct hyp_page *p,
> + unsigned int order)
> +{
> + struct hyp_page *buddy;
> +
> + list_del_init(&p->node);
> + while (p->order > order) {
> + /*
> + * The buddy of order n - 1 currently has HYP_NO_ORDER as it
> + * is covered by a higher-level page (whose head is @p). Use
> + * __find_buddy_nocheck() to find it and inject it in the
> + * free_list[n - 1], effectively splitting @p in half.
> + */
> + p->order--;
> + buddy = __find_buddy_nocheck(pool, p, p->order);
> + buddy->order = p->order;
> + list_add_tail(&buddy->node, &pool->free_area[buddy->order]);
> + }
> +
> + return p;
> +}
> +
> +void hyp_put_page(void *addr)
> +{
> + struct hyp_page *p = hyp_virt_to_page(addr);
> +
> + if (hyp_page_ref_dec_and_test(p))
> + hyp_attach_page(p);
> +}
> +
> +void hyp_get_page(void *addr)
> +{
> + struct hyp_page *p = hyp_virt_to_page(addr);
> +
> + hyp_page_ref_inc(p);
> +}
> +
> +void *hyp_alloc_pages(struct hyp_pool *pool, unsigned int order)
> +{
> + unsigned int i = order;
> + struct hyp_page *p;
> +
> + hyp_spin_lock(&pool->lock);
> +
> + /* Look for a high-enough-order page */
> + while (i < pool->max_order && list_empty(&pool->free_area[i]))
> + i++;
> + if (i >= pool->max_order) {
> + hyp_spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> + /* Extract it from the tree at the right order */
> + p = list_first_entry(&pool->free_area[i], struct hyp_page, node);
> + p = __hyp_extract_page(pool, p, order);
> +
> + hyp_spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
> + hyp_page_ref_inc(p);
I find this a little scary, as we momentarily drop the lock. It think
it's ok because the reference count on the page must be 0 at this point,
but actually then I think it would be clearer to have a
hyp_page_ref_init() function which could take the lock, check that the
refcount is indeed 0 and then set it to 1.
What do you think?
Will
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-04 15:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-02 14:59 [PATCH v3 00/32] KVM: arm64: A stage 2 for the host Quentin Perret
2021-03-02 14:59 ` [PATCH v3 01/32] arm64: lib: Annotate {clear, copy}_page() as position-independent Quentin Perret
2021-03-02 14:59 ` [PATCH v3 02/32] KVM: arm64: Link position-independent string routines into .hyp.text Quentin Perret
2021-03-02 14:59 ` [PATCH v3 03/32] arm64: kvm: Add standalone ticket spinlock implementation for use at hyp Quentin Perret
2021-03-02 14:59 ` [PATCH v3 04/32] KVM: arm64: Initialize kvm_nvhe_init_params early Quentin Perret
2021-03-04 13:39 ` Will Deacon
2021-03-02 14:59 ` [PATCH v3 05/32] KVM: arm64: Avoid free_page() in page-table allocator Quentin Perret
2021-03-02 14:59 ` [PATCH v3 06/32] KVM: arm64: Factor memory allocation out of pgtable.c Quentin Perret
2021-03-04 14:06 ` Will Deacon
2021-03-02 14:59 ` [PATCH v3 07/32] KVM: arm64: Introduce a BSS section for use at Hyp Quentin Perret
2021-03-04 14:09 ` Will Deacon
2021-03-02 14:59 ` [PATCH v3 08/32] KVM: arm64: Make kvm_call_hyp() a function call " Quentin Perret
2021-03-02 14:59 ` [PATCH v3 09/32] KVM: arm64: Allow using kvm_nvhe_sym() in hyp code Quentin Perret
2021-03-02 14:59 ` [PATCH v3 10/32] KVM: arm64: Introduce an early Hyp page allocator Quentin Perret
2021-03-04 14:38 ` Will Deacon
2021-03-02 14:59 ` [PATCH v3 11/32] KVM: arm64: Stub CONFIG_DEBUG_LIST at Hyp Quentin Perret
2021-03-02 14:59 ` [PATCH v3 12/32] KVM: arm64: Introduce a Hyp buddy page allocator Quentin Perret
2021-03-04 15:30 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2021-03-04 15:49 ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-02 14:59 ` [PATCH v3 13/32] KVM: arm64: Enable access to sanitized CPU features at EL2 Quentin Perret
2021-03-02 14:59 ` [PATCH v3 14/32] KVM: arm64: Factor out vector address calculation Quentin Perret
2021-03-02 14:59 ` [PATCH v3 15/32] KVM: arm64: Prepare the creation of s1 mappings at EL2 Quentin Perret
2021-03-04 18:47 ` Will Deacon
2021-03-02 14:59 ` [PATCH v3 16/32] KVM: arm64: Elevate hypervisor mappings creation " Quentin Perret
2021-03-04 19:25 ` Will Deacon
2021-03-05 9:14 ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-02 14:59 ` [PATCH v3 17/32] KVM: arm64: Use kvm_arch for stage 2 pgtable Quentin Perret
2021-03-02 14:59 ` [PATCH v3 18/32] KVM: arm64: Use kvm_arch in kvm_s2_mmu Quentin Perret
2021-03-02 14:59 ` [PATCH v3 19/32] KVM: arm64: Set host stage 2 using kvm_nvhe_init_params Quentin Perret
2021-03-02 14:59 ` [PATCH v3 20/32] KVM: arm64: Refactor kvm_arm_setup_stage2() Quentin Perret
2021-03-04 19:35 ` Will Deacon
2021-03-02 14:59 ` [PATCH v3 21/32] KVM: arm64: Refactor __load_guest_stage2() Quentin Perret
2021-03-02 14:59 ` [PATCH v3 22/32] KVM: arm64: Refactor __populate_fault_info() Quentin Perret
2021-03-04 19:39 ` Will Deacon
2021-03-02 14:59 ` [PATCH v3 23/32] KVM: arm64: Make memcache anonymous in pgtable allocator Quentin Perret
2021-03-04 19:44 ` Will Deacon
2021-03-02 14:59 ` [PATCH v3 24/32] KVM: arm64: Reserve memory for host stage 2 Quentin Perret
2021-03-04 19:49 ` Will Deacon
2021-03-05 9:17 ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-02 14:59 ` [PATCH v3 25/32] KVM: arm64: Sort the hypervisor memblocks Quentin Perret
2021-03-04 19:51 ` Will Deacon
2021-03-02 14:59 ` [PATCH v3 26/32] KVM: arm64: Introduce PROT_NONE mappings for stage 2 Quentin Perret
2021-03-04 20:00 ` Will Deacon
2021-03-05 9:52 ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-05 19:03 ` Will Deacon
2021-03-02 14:59 ` [PATCH v3 27/32] KVM: arm64: Refactor stage2_map_set_prot_attr() Quentin Perret
2021-03-04 20:03 ` Will Deacon
2021-03-05 9:18 ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-02 14:59 ` [PATCH v3 28/32] KVM: arm64: Add kvm_pgtable_stage2_idmap_greedy() Quentin Perret
2021-03-05 14:39 ` Will Deacon
2021-03-05 15:03 ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-05 16:59 ` Will Deacon
2021-03-02 14:59 ` [PATCH v3 29/32] KVM: arm64: Wrap the host with a stage 2 Quentin Perret
2021-03-05 19:29 ` Will Deacon
2021-03-08 9:22 ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-08 12:46 ` Will Deacon
2021-03-08 13:38 ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-08 13:52 ` Will Deacon
2021-03-02 15:00 ` [PATCH v3 30/32] KVM: arm64: Page-align the .hyp sections Quentin Perret
2021-03-04 20:05 ` Will Deacon
2021-03-02 15:00 ` [PATCH v3 31/32] KVM: arm64: Disable PMU support in protected mode Quentin Perret
2021-03-05 19:02 ` Will Deacon
2021-03-02 15:00 ` [PATCH v3 32/32] KVM: arm64: Protect the .hyp sections from the host Quentin Perret
2021-03-05 19:13 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210304153036.GA21507@willie-the-truck \
--to=will@kernel.org \
--cc=android-kvm@google.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dbrazdil@google.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mate.toth-pal@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=qperret@google.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox