From: Andrei Vagin <avagin@gmail.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrei Vagin <avagin@gmail.com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
Keno Fischer <keno@juliacomputing.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] arm64/ptrace: introduce orig_x7 in the user_pt_regs structure
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 15:50:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210322225053.428615-3-avagin@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210322225053.428615-1-avagin@gmail.com>
We have some ABI weirdness in the way that we handle syscall exit stops
because we indicate whether or not the stop has been signalled from
syscall entry or syscall exit by clobbering a general purpose register
x7 in the tracee and restoring its old value after the stop.
This behavior was inherited from ARM and it isn't common for other
architectures. Now, we have PTRACE_GET_SYSCALL_INFO that gives all
required information about system calls, so the hack with clobbering
registers isn't needed anymore.
This change instroduces orig_x7 in the user_pt_regs structure that will
contains an origin value of the x7 register if the tracee is stopped in
a system call..
Signed-off-by: Andrei Vagin <avagin@gmail.com>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h | 1 +
arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h | 1 +
arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h
index d4cdf98ac003..1008f0fbc5ea 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h
@@ -184,6 +184,7 @@ struct pt_regs {
u64 pc;
u64 pstate;
u64 orig_x0;
+ u64 orig_x7;
};
};
#ifdef __AARCH64EB__
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h
index 3c118c5b0893..be7583ff5f4d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h
@@ -91,6 +91,7 @@ struct user_pt_regs {
__u64 pc;
__u64 pstate;
__u64 orig_x0;
+ __u64 orig_x7;
};
struct user_fpsimd_state {
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c
index 170f42fd6101..1ed5b4aa986b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -1750,7 +1750,7 @@ static void tracehook_report_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs,
enum ptrace_syscall_dir dir)
{
int regno;
- unsigned long saved_reg;
+ u64 _saved_reg, *saved_reg;
/*
* We have some ABI weirdness here in the way that we handle syscall
@@ -1768,19 +1768,25 @@ static void tracehook_report_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs,
* - Syscall stops behave differently to seccomp and pseudo-step traps
* (the latter do not nobble any registers).
*/
- regno = (is_compat_task() ? 12 : 7);
- saved_reg = regs->regs[regno];
+ if (is_compat_task()) {
+ regno = 12;
+ saved_reg = &_saved_reg;
+ } else {
+ regno = 7;
+ saved_reg = ®s->orig_x7;
+ }
+ *saved_reg = regs->regs[regno];
regs->regs[regno] = dir;
if (dir == PTRACE_SYSCALL_ENTER) {
if (tracehook_report_syscall_entry(regs))
forget_syscall(regs);
- regs->regs[regno] = saved_reg;
+ regs->regs[regno] = *saved_reg;
} else if (!test_thread_flag(TIF_SINGLESTEP)) {
tracehook_report_syscall_exit(regs, 0);
- regs->regs[regno] = saved_reg;
+ regs->regs[regno] = *saved_reg;
} else {
- regs->regs[regno] = saved_reg;
+ regs->regs[regno] = *saved_reg;
/*
* Signal a pseudo-step exception since we are stepping but
--
2.29.2
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-22 22:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-22 22:50 [PATCH 0/4 v3] arm64/ptrace: allow to get all registers on syscall traps Andrei Vagin
2021-03-22 22:50 ` [PATCH 1/4] arm64: expose orig_x0 in the user_pt_regs structure Andrei Vagin
2021-03-26 18:28 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-03-27 0:35 ` Andrei Vagin
2021-03-27 13:01 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-03-22 22:50 ` Andrei Vagin [this message]
2021-03-26 18:39 ` [PATCH 2/4] arm64/ptrace: introduce orig_x7 " Catalin Marinas
2021-03-22 22:50 ` [PATCH 3/4] selftest/arm64/ptrace: add a test for orig_x0 Andrei Vagin
2021-03-22 22:50 ` [PATCH 4/4] selftest/arm64/ptrace: add a test for orig_x7 Andrei Vagin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210322225053.428615-3-avagin@gmail.com \
--to=avagin@gmail.com \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=keno@juliacomputing.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).