Re: [PATCH 1/1] arm: dts: owl-s500-roseapplepi: Add ATC2603C PMIC

Cristian Ciocaltea
2021-04-01T10:00:55Z

On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 11:13:00AM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 11:49:27AM +0200, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
> > Add device tree node for ATC2603C PMIC and remove the 'fixed-3.1V'
> > dummy regulator used for the uSD supply.
> >
> > Additionally, add 'SYSPWR' fixed regulator and provide cpu0 supply.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@gmail.com>
>
> Applied to for-next after fixing the patch subject as below:
>
> "ARM: dts: owl-s500-roseapplepi: Add ATC2603C PMIC"

I encountered commits with both "ARM: dts:" and "arm: dts:" prefixes,
so I wasn't sure if there is a preferred format.

I have just counted the no. of occurrences in git log for both variants
and it seems the former is indeed more common, so I will make sure to
use "ARM: ..." from now on.

Thanks for noticing this,
Cristi

> Thanks,
> Mani …