Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: "Isaac J. Manjarres" <isaacm@codeaurora.org>,
	pratikp@codeaurora.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	robin.murphy@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 09/15] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Prepare PTE methods for handling multiple entries
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 15:02:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210408140230.GA3884124@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210408135925.GC17998@willie-the-truck>

On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 02:59:26PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > -static void __arm_lpae_sync_pte(arm_lpae_iopte *ptep,
> > +static void __arm_lpae_sync_pte(arm_lpae_iopte *ptep, int num_entries,
> >  				struct io_pgtable_cfg *cfg)
> >  {
> >  	dma_sync_single_for_device(cfg->iommu_dev, __arm_lpae_dma_addr(ptep),
> > -				   sizeof(*ptep), DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> > +				   sizeof(*ptep) * num_entries, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> >  }
> 
> Have you tested this with CONFIG_DMA_API_DEBUG=y? I _think_ it should be
> ok as long as we don't attempt to sync across a page boundary, but it would
> be good to give it a spin just to check.

syncing over a page boundary is perfectly fine.  It just needs to say in
the bounds of the original mapping.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-08 14:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20210408045241.27316-1-isaacm@codeaurora.org>
     [not found] ` <20210408045241.27316-13-isaacm@codeaurora.org>
2021-04-08 13:58   ` [RFC PATCH v4 12/15] iommu/io-pgtable-arm-v7s: Implement arm_v7s_unmap_pages() Will Deacon
     [not found]     ` <342d453c1e5d737122b43be006de6077@codeaurora.org>
2021-04-08 14:32       ` Will Deacon
     [not found] ` <20210408045241.27316-7-isaacm@codeaurora.org>
2021-04-08 13:59   ` [RFC PATCH v4 06/15] iommu: Split 'addr_merge' argument to iommu_pgsize() into separate parts Will Deacon
     [not found] ` <20210408045241.27316-10-isaacm@codeaurora.org>
2021-04-08 13:59   ` [RFC PATCH v4 09/15] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Prepare PTE methods for handling multiple entries Will Deacon
2021-04-08 14:02     ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2021-04-08 14:20       ` Will Deacon
     [not found] ` <20210408045241.27316-11-isaacm@codeaurora.org>
2021-04-08 14:32   ` [RFC PATCH v4 10/15] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Implement arm_lpae_unmap_pages() Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210408140230.GA3884124@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=isaacm@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=pratikp@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox