linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 01/10] genirq: Add chip flag to denote automatic IRQ (un)masking
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2021 10:17:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210409101725.00007271@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210408154326.3988781-2-valentin.schneider@arm.com>

On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 16:43:17 +0100
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com> wrote:

> Some IRQ chips such as the Arm GICs automagically mask / unmask an
> IRQ during the handling of said IRQ. This renders further mask / unmask
> operations within the flow handlers redundant, which we do want to leverage
> as masking by itself is not cheap (Distributor access via MMIO for GICs).
> 
> This is different from having a chip->irq_mask_ack() callback as this
> masking is:
> - inherent to the chip->irq_ack() and *cannot* be omitted
> - a *different* masking state than chip->irq_mask() (chip->irq_mask() is
>   idempotent, chip->irq_ack() really isn't)
> 
> Add a chip flag, IRQCHIP_AUTOMASKS_FLOW, to denote chips with such
> behaviour. Add a new IRQ data flag, IRQD_IRQ_FLOW_MASKED, to keep this
> flow-induced mask state separate from regular mask / unmask operations
> (IRQD_IRQ_MASKED).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Hi Valentin,

One totally trivial thing noticed whilst reading.

> ---
>  include/linux/irq.h    | 10 ++++++++++
>  kernel/irq/chip.c      |  5 +++++
>  kernel/irq/debugfs.c   |  2 ++
>  kernel/irq/internals.h |  5 +++++
>  4 files changed, 22 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/irq.h b/include/linux/irq.h
> index bee82809107c..580b1b6b1799 100644
> --- a/include/linux/irq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/irq.h
> @@ -219,6 +219,8 @@ struct irq_data {
>   *				  irq_chip::irq_set_affinity() when deactivated.
>   * IRQD_IRQ_ENABLED_ON_SUSPEND	- Interrupt is enabled on suspend by irq pm if
>   *				  irqchip have flag IRQCHIP_ENABLE_WAKEUP_ON_SUSPEND set.
> + * IRQD_IRQ_FLOW_MASKED         - Interrupt is masked by ACK. Only EOI can
> + *                                clear this.

Nitpick of the day : Seems text above is using tabs for white space blocks
whereas you have used spaces. Make it consistent.
It's not consistent in the file so I guess you could clean that up, or
just go with making it consistent in this block.

>   */
>  enum {
>  	IRQD_TRIGGER_MASK		= 0xf,
> @@ -245,6 +247,7 @@ enum {
>  	IRQD_HANDLE_ENFORCE_IRQCTX	= (1 << 28),
>  	IRQD_AFFINITY_ON_ACTIVATE	= (1 << 29),
>  	IRQD_IRQ_ENABLED_ON_SUSPEND	= (1 << 30),
> +	IRQD_IRQ_FLOW_MASKED            = (1 << 31),
>  };
>  
>  #define __irqd_to_state(d) ACCESS_PRIVATE((d)->common, state_use_accessors)
> @@ -349,6 +352,11 @@ static inline bool irqd_irq_masked(struct irq_data *d)
>  	return __irqd_to_state(d) & IRQD_IRQ_MASKED;
>  }
>  
> +static inline bool irqd_irq_flow_masked(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> +	return __irqd_to_state(d) & IRQD_IRQ_FLOW_MASKED;
> +}
> +
>  static inline bool irqd_irq_inprogress(struct irq_data *d)
>  {
>  	return __irqd_to_state(d) & IRQD_IRQ_INPROGRESS;
> @@ -567,6 +575,7 @@ struct irq_chip {
>   * IRQCHIP_SUPPORTS_NMI:              Chip can deliver NMIs, only for root irqchips
>   * IRQCHIP_ENABLE_WAKEUP_ON_SUSPEND:  Invokes __enable_irq()/__disable_irq() for wake irqs
>   *                                    in the suspend path if they are in disabled state
> + * IRQCHIP_AUTOMASKS_FLOW:            chip->ack() masks and chip->eoi() unmasks
>   */
>  enum {
>  	IRQCHIP_SET_TYPE_MASKED			= (1 <<  0),
> @@ -579,6 +588,7 @@ enum {
>  	IRQCHIP_SUPPORTS_LEVEL_MSI		= (1 <<  7),
>  	IRQCHIP_SUPPORTS_NMI			= (1 <<  8),
>  	IRQCHIP_ENABLE_WAKEUP_ON_SUSPEND	= (1 <<  9),
> +	IRQCHIP_AUTOMASKS_FLOW                  = (1 <<  10),
>  };
>  
>  #include <linux/irqdesc.h>
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/chip.c b/kernel/irq/chip.c
> index 8cc8e5713287..18c3b0e1568a 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/chip.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/chip.c
> @@ -173,6 +173,11 @@ static void irq_state_clr_masked(struct irq_desc *desc)
>  	irqd_clear(&desc->irq_data, IRQD_IRQ_MASKED);
>  }
>  
> +static void irq_state_clr_flow_masked(struct irq_desc *desc)
> +{
> +	irqd_clear(&desc->irq_data, IRQD_IRQ_FLOW_MASKED);
> +}
> +
>  static void irq_state_clr_started(struct irq_desc *desc)
>  {
>  	irqd_clear(&desc->irq_data, IRQD_IRQ_STARTED);
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/debugfs.c b/kernel/irq/debugfs.c
> index e4cff358b437..3ae83622d701 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/debugfs.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/debugfs.c
> @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ static const struct irq_bit_descr irqchip_flags[] = {
>  	BIT_MASK_DESCR(IRQCHIP_SUPPORTS_LEVEL_MSI),
>  	BIT_MASK_DESCR(IRQCHIP_SUPPORTS_NMI),
>  	BIT_MASK_DESCR(IRQCHIP_ENABLE_WAKEUP_ON_SUSPEND),
> +	BIT_MASK_DESCR(IRQCHIP_AUTOMASKS_FLOW),
>  };
>  
>  static void
> @@ -103,6 +104,7 @@ static const struct irq_bit_descr irqdata_states[] = {
>  	BIT_MASK_DESCR(IRQD_IRQ_STARTED),
>  	BIT_MASK_DESCR(IRQD_IRQ_DISABLED),
>  	BIT_MASK_DESCR(IRQD_IRQ_MASKED),
> +	BIT_MASK_DESCR(IRQD_IRQ_FLOW_MASKED),
>  	BIT_MASK_DESCR(IRQD_IRQ_INPROGRESS),
>  
>  	BIT_MASK_DESCR(IRQD_PER_CPU),
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/internals.h b/kernel/irq/internals.h
> index 54363527feea..b6c1cceddec0 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/internals.h
> +++ b/kernel/irq/internals.h
> @@ -245,6 +245,11 @@ static inline void irq_state_set_masked(struct irq_desc *desc)
>  	irqd_set(&desc->irq_data, IRQD_IRQ_MASKED);
>  }
>  
> +static inline void irq_state_set_flow_masked(struct irq_desc *desc)
> +{
> +	irqd_set(&desc->irq_data, IRQD_IRQ_FLOW_MASKED);
> +}
> +
>  #undef __irqd_to_state
>  
>  static inline void __kstat_incr_irqs_this_cpu(struct irq_desc *desc)


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-09  9:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-08 15:43 [RFC PATCH 00/10] irqchip/irq-gic: Optimize masking by leveraging EOImode=1 Valentin Schneider
2021-04-08 15:43 ` [RFC PATCH 01/10] genirq: Add chip flag to denote automatic IRQ (un)masking Valentin Schneider
2021-04-09  9:17   ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2021-04-09 10:34     ` Valentin Schneider
2021-04-08 15:43 ` [RFC PATCH 02/10] genirq: Define irq_ack() and irq_eoi() helpers Valentin Schneider
2021-04-08 15:43 ` [RFC PATCH 03/10] genirq: Employ ack_irq() and eoi_irq() where relevant Valentin Schneider
2021-04-08 15:43 ` [RFC PATCH 04/10] genirq: Add handle_strict_flow_irq() flow handler Valentin Schneider
2021-04-08 15:43 ` [RFC PATCH 05/10] genirq: Let purely flow-masked ONESHOT irqs through unmask_threaded_irq() Valentin Schneider
2021-04-09 13:52   ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-08 15:43 ` [RFC PATCH 06/10] genirq: Don't mask IRQ within flow handler if IRQ is flow-masked Valentin Schneider
2021-04-09 13:57   ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-08 15:43 ` [RFC PATCH 07/10] genirq, irq-gic-v3: Make NMI flow handlers use ->irq_ack() if available Valentin Schneider
2021-04-08 15:43 ` [RFC PATCH 08/10] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Use irq_chip_ack_parent() Valentin Schneider
2021-04-08 15:43 ` [RFC PATCH 09/10] irqchip/gic: Convert to handle_strict_flow_irq() Valentin Schneider
2021-04-08 15:43 ` [RFC PATCH 10/10] irqchip/gic-v3: " Valentin Schneider

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210409101725.00007271@Huawei.com \
    --to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).