public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
To: Alexander A Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@nokia.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/3] ARM: Implement MODULE_PLT support in FTRACE
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2021 16:33:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210409153309.wbebto3eufui35qs@e107158-lin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210330114035.18575-1-alexander.sverdlin@nokia.com>

Adding Linus Walleij back to CC

On 03/30/21 13:40, Alexander A Sverdlin wrote:
> From: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@nokia.com>
> 
> FTRACE's function tracer currently doesn't always work on ARM with
> MODULE_PLT option enabled. If the module is loaded too far, FTRACE's
> code modifier cannot cope with introduced veneers and turns the
> function tracer off globally.
> 
> ARM64 already has a solution for the problem, refer to the following
> patches:
> 
> arm64: ftrace: emit ftrace-mod.o contents through code
> arm64: module-plts: factor out PLT generation code for ftrace
> arm64: ftrace: fix !CONFIG_ARM64_MODULE_PLTS kernels
> arm64: ftrace: fix building without CONFIG_MODULES
> arm64: ftrace: add support for far branches to dynamic ftrace
> arm64: ftrace: don't validate branch via PLT in ftrace_make_nop()
> 
> But the presented ARM variant has just a half of the footprint in terms of
> the changed LoCs. It also retains the code validation-before-modification
> instead of switching it off.
> 
> Changelog:
> v8:
> * Add warn suppress parameter to arm_gen_branch_link()

I still think the ifdefery in patch 3 is ugly. Any reason my suggestion didn't
work out for you? I struggle to see how this is better and why it was hard to
incorporate my suggestion.

For example

	-       old = ftrace_call_replace(ip, adjust_address(rec, addr));
	+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_MODULE_PLTS
	+       /* mod is only supplied during module loading */
	+       if (!mod)
	+               mod = rec->arch.mod;
	+       else
	+               rec->arch.mod = mod;
	+#endif
	+
	+       old = ftrace_call_replace(ip, aaddr,
	+                                 !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_MODULE_PLTS) || !mod);
	+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_MODULE_PLTS
	+       if (!old && mod) {
	+               aaddr = get_module_plt(mod, ip, aaddr);
	+               old = ftrace_call_replace(ip, aaddr, true);
	+       }
	+#endif
	+

There's an ifdef, followed by a code that embeds
!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_MODULE_PLTS) followed by another ifdef :-/

And there was no need to make the new warn arg visible all the way to
ftrace_call_repalce() and all of its users.

FWIW

Tested-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>

If this gets accepted as-is, I'll send a patch to improve on this.


Thanks

--
Qais Yousef

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-04-09 15:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-30 11:40 [PATCH v8 0/3] ARM: Implement MODULE_PLT support in FTRACE Alexander A Sverdlin
2021-03-30 11:40 ` [PATCH v8 1/3] ARM: PLT: Move struct plt_entries definition to header Alexander A Sverdlin
2021-03-30 11:40 ` [PATCH v8 2/3] ARM: Add warn suppress parameter to arm_gen_branch_link() Alexander A Sverdlin
2021-03-30 11:40 ` [PATCH v8 3/3] ARM: ftrace: Add MODULE_PLTS support Alexander A Sverdlin
2021-03-30 18:57 ` [PATCH v8 0/3] ARM: Implement MODULE_PLT support in FTRACE Florian Fainelli
2021-04-01 23:52 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-04-09 15:33 ` Qais Yousef [this message]
2021-04-12  6:28   ` Alexander Sverdlin
2021-04-12 11:08     ` Qais Yousef
2021-04-19 21:54       ` Florian Fainelli
2021-04-19 22:34         ` Qais Yousef
2021-05-04 19:11           ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-05  8:02             ` Alexander Sverdlin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210409153309.wbebto3eufui35qs@e107158-lin \
    --to=qais.yousef@arm.com \
    --cc=alexander.sverdlin@nokia.com \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox