public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@huawei.com>
To: <will@kernel.org>, <mark.rutland@arm.com>, <peterz@infradead.org>,
	<mingo@redhat.com>, <acme@kernel.org>,
	<alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>, <jolsa@redhat.com>,
	<namhyung@kernel.org>, <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	<suzuki.poulose@arm.com>, <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <yangjihong1@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH] arm_pmu: Fix write counter incorrect in ARMv7 big-endian mode
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 09:26:59 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210430012659.232110-1-yangjihong1@huawei.com> (raw)

Commit 3a95200d3f89a ("arm_pmu: Change API to support 64bit counter values")
changes the input "value" type from 32-bit to 64-bit,
which introduces the following problem:
ARMv7 PMU counters is 32-bit width, in big-endian mode, write counter uses
high 32-bit, which writes an incorrect value.

Before:

 Performance counter stats for 'ls':

              2.22 msec task-clock                #    0.675 CPUs utilized
                 0      context-switches          #    0.000 K/sec
                 0      cpu-migrations            #    0.000 K/sec
                49      page-faults               #    0.022 M/sec
        2150476593      cycles                    #  966.663 GHz
        2148588788      instructions              #    1.00  insn per cycle
        2147745484      branches                  # 965435.074 M/sec
        2147508540      branch-misses             #   99.99% of all branches

None of the above hw event counters are correct.

Solution:

"value" forcibly converted to 32-bit type before being written to PMU register.

After:

 Performance counter stats for 'ls':

              2.09 msec task-clock                #    0.681 CPUs utilized
                 0      context-switches          #    0.000 K/sec
                 0      cpu-migrations            #    0.000 K/sec
                46      page-faults               #    0.022 M/sec
           2807301      cycles                    #    1.344 GHz
           1060159      instructions              #    0.38  insn per cycle
            250496      branches                  #  119.914 M/sec
             23192      branch-misses             #    9.26% of all branches

Fixes: 3a95200d3f89a ("arm_pmu: Change API to support 64bit counter values")
Signed-off-by: Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@huawei.com>
---
 arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c
index 2924d7910b10..eb2190477da1 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c
@@ -773,10 +773,10 @@ static inline void armv7pmu_write_counter(struct perf_event *event, u64 value)
 		pr_err("CPU%u writing wrong counter %d\n",
 			smp_processor_id(), idx);
 	} else if (idx == ARMV7_IDX_CYCLE_COUNTER) {
-		asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c13, 0" : : "r" (value));
+		asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c13, 0" : : "r" ((u32)value));
 	} else {
 		armv7_pmnc_select_counter(idx);
-		asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c13, 2" : : "r" (value));
+		asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c13, 2" : : "r" ((u32)value));
 	}
 }
 
-- 
2.30.GIT


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

             reply	other threads:[~2021-04-30  1:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-30  1:26 Yang Jihong [this message]
2021-04-30 12:34 ` [PATCH] arm_pmu: Fix write counter incorrect in ARMv7 big-endian mode Mark Rutland
2021-05-20  8:31   ` Yang Jihong
2021-06-01 18:21 ` Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210430012659.232110-1-yangjihong1@huawei.com \
    --to=yangjihong1@huawei.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox