From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C84BDC4708F for ; Mon, 31 May 2021 08:19:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B053610C8 for ; Mon, 31 May 2021 08:19:16 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 8B053610C8 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=5wo9Nnb6e6+HCZfZnqbeEV98iMzMadDR29Ac4EWTH90=; b=XcRc+9SR8839cr sNpmFmRdJ4WTfrAcP+vqMSjlfrQcpdURzRk2y0xCzZpQyXN99hWxv8nl5VhXPI4UQtD/gRgsvcCWR a7SKXpoq/uYWyeXUEEC18aFvUoe9LBBAuTViSv2kIrs/oIXI48IDq9pymI2d8oCy6R5d0H5U3JVvS +tQXZAMj+3mQOp6+ayIvMNU669ZhyKpM3I4MheyCaGowL/1ABen8oXjMbADMG6Z0MG0FsodRE/YTf gZR0OSHxEdypg9FyIrJGSatAE0re92zjNN60o7dLUSkIr2Iynio1ews0pYylDBdfDzx+xdoB/xDd6 mFWZcBHmDZp0mEc8xGrA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lnd7J-00BNwz-Df; Mon, 31 May 2021 08:17:45 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lnd7B-00BNvL-LQ for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 31 May 2021 08:17:38 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 761C46D; Mon, 31 May 2021 01:17:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bogus (unknown [10.57.72.241]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B6B513F73D; Mon, 31 May 2021 01:17:34 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 09:17:30 +0100 From: Sudeep Holla To: Rob Herring Cc: Cristian Marussi , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] dt-bindings: mailbox : arm, mhu: Fix arm, scpi example used here Message-ID: <20210531081730.jckoxxntct3qmymq@bogus> References: <20210526182807.548118-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <20210526182807.548118-7-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <1622125407.781075.731789.nullmailer@robh.at.kernel.org> <20210527162503.4w7sch36ov6ew4mo@bogus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210531_011737_768066_674EDC76 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 15.31 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 03:07:39PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 11:25 AM Sudeep Holla wrote: [...] > > Just curious if this is built as past of the series as I am unable to hit > > this issue. However I get this if I remove 5/8 which is adding the scpi > > yaml schema. Am I missing something ? > > The automated check does try to apply series, but runs checks a patch > at time and it resets the base if it gets an error on a patch. I think > switching patch 5 and 6 order should fix things. Don't worry about > that yet, I'll look at the rest of the series. > Ah OK, will re-order them. Thanks for the review. -- Regards, Sudeep _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel