From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BC7AC47082 for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2021 12:09:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A481613F0 for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2021 12:09:12 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 0A481613F0 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=2DiAqX6dqKv+fmiGIIvLNjCmOjEJI8yERGgLmRPn/lE=; b=jtOi/HqiYl60HC dM5ejUg6OCyPs6YcKivMCCu03V5aXymsdG+GyfIg+AqJB1MDdrUDu38Uu/2cQJANesVaxU6oQcZ78 Q/+M8dfH7l73YBt8TfQklNBt1Q93Ry/GZNNItvGb71QYZx9zJYBrxtn/Bl4qkToRAoerQo+5h3fwu Po7dFoQZ7DBeqNj/ST32j5jVYa9Ipc9FEuqAyKJIehprCA6q2FLbUVq4Ee6iNdYOPNjPcgbo31vfq Onrrael5POu/zK1gq+zx0FH2hxgBSB8JrJeVhfkq4od66MnpfbbVh9EDQskr2ZJsM3zt/boqgNDdF DtuJoZ+uGPLxSlobr3BQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lom8J-008YsD-PY; Thu, 03 Jun 2021 12:07:31 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lom8B-008Yio-Qd for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 03 Jun 2021 12:07:28 +0000 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 84AB261001; Thu, 3 Jun 2021 12:07:21 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2021 13:07:19 +0100 From: Catalin Marinas To: Kees Cook Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Fangrui Song , Will Deacon , Ard Biesheuvel , Mark Rutland , Marc Zyngier , David Brazdil , Linux ARM , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: vmlinux.lds.S: keep .entry.tramp.text section Message-ID: <20210603120718.GA20338@arm.com> References: <20210226140352.3477860-1-arnd@kernel.org> <202102261256.AF256702@keescook> <20210227043257.k3aernmnzsvitp7c@google.com> <20210316104530.GA7309@arm.com> <20210316162745.GA20565@arm.com> <20210316190921.GB28565@arm.com> <202106021231.A1B7A10@keescook> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <202106021231.A1B7A10@keescook> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210603_050723_919333_00ECF0CB X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 35.05 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 12:32:40PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 07:09:23PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 05:39:27PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 5:27 PM Catalin Marinas wrote: > > > > On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 10:45:32AM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 08:32:57PM -0800, Fangrui Song wrote: > > > > > > On 2021-02-26, Kees Cook wrote: > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 03:03:39PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > > > > > From: Arnd Bergmann > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > When building with CONFIG_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION, > > > > > > > > I sometimes see an assertion > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ld.lld: error: Entry trampoline text too big > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Heh, "too big" seems a weird report for having it discarded. :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any idea on this Fangrui? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ( I see this is https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1311 ) > > > > > > > > > > > > This diagnostic is from an ASSERT in arch/arm64/kernel/vmlinux.lds > > > > > > > > > > > > ASSERT((__entry_tramp_text_end - __entry_tramp_text_start) == (1 << 16), > > > > > > "Entry trampoline text too big") > > > > > > > > > > Can we not change the ASSERT to be <= PAGE_SIZE instead? > > > > > > > > Ah, that won't work as I suspect we still need the trampoline section. > > > > > > > > Arnd, do you know why this section disappears? I did a simple test with > > > > defconfig + LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION and the trampoline section is > > > > still around. > > > > > > If I remember correctly, this showed up when CONFIG_ARM_SDE_INTERFACE > > > is disabled, which dropped the only reference into this section. > > > If that doesn't make sense, I can try digging through the old build logs to > > > reproduce the problem. > > > > I suspected this as well but still worked for me when disabling it. > > > > Anyway, I don't think identifying the exact option is necessary. With > > CONFIG_UNMAP_KERNEL_AT_EL0=y we need this section around even if only > > __entry_tramp_text_start/end are referenced. > > > > In this case we happened to detect this issue because of the ASSERT in > > vmlinux.lds.S but I wonder what else the linker drops with this dead > > code elimination that we may not notice (it seems to remove about 500KB > > from the resulting image in my test). > > > > I'll push these two patches to -next for wider coverage before deciding > > on mainline (though the option may not get much testing as it's hidden > > behind EXPERT and default n). > > I don't see this in -next? Catalin, do you want me to pick it up as part > of my collecting various linker fixes? IIRC this patch only makes sense if we also enable HAVE_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION on arm64. Last time I looked at Arnd's RFC it still had some issues: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210319122506.GA6832@arm.com So I decided against queuing that for now (and this patch on top was not necessary). -- Catalin _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel