From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 4/9] iommu/arm-smmu: tegra: Detect number of instances at runtime
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2021 18:46:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210603164632.1000458-5-thierry.reding@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210603164632.1000458-1-thierry.reding@gmail.com>
From: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Parse the reg property in device tree and detect the number of instances
represented by a device tree node. This is subsequently needed in order
to support single-instance SMMUs with the Tegra implementation because
additional programming is needed to properly configure the SID override
registers in the memory controller.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
---
Changes in v3:
- move .probe_finalize initialization to later patch
Changes in v2:
- provide a separate implementation to simplify single instances
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-nvidia.c | 57 ++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-nvidia.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-nvidia.c
index 29117444e5a0..23889090eb01 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-nvidia.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-nvidia.c
@@ -20,13 +20,19 @@
* The third instance usage is through standard arm-smmu driver itself and
* is out of scope of this implementation.
*/
-#define NUM_SMMU_INSTANCES 2
+#define MAX_SMMU_INSTANCES 2
struct nvidia_smmu {
- struct arm_smmu_device smmu;
- void __iomem *bases[NUM_SMMU_INSTANCES];
+ struct arm_smmu_device smmu;
+ void __iomem *bases[MAX_SMMU_INSTANCES];
+ unsigned int num_instances;
};
+static inline struct nvidia_smmu *to_nvidia_smmu(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
+{
+ return container_of(smmu, struct nvidia_smmu, smmu);
+}
+
static inline void __iomem *nvidia_smmu_page(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
unsigned int inst, int page)
{
@@ -47,9 +53,10 @@ static u32 nvidia_smmu_read_reg(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
static void nvidia_smmu_write_reg(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
int page, int offset, u32 val)
{
+ struct nvidia_smmu *nvidia = to_nvidia_smmu(smmu);
unsigned int i;
- for (i = 0; i < NUM_SMMU_INSTANCES; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < nvidia->num_instances; i++) {
void __iomem *reg = nvidia_smmu_page(smmu, i, page) + offset;
writel_relaxed(val, reg);
@@ -67,9 +74,10 @@ static u64 nvidia_smmu_read_reg64(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
static void nvidia_smmu_write_reg64(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
int page, int offset, u64 val)
{
+ struct nvidia_smmu *nvidia = to_nvidia_smmu(smmu);
unsigned int i;
- for (i = 0; i < NUM_SMMU_INSTANCES; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < nvidia->num_instances; i++) {
void __iomem *reg = nvidia_smmu_page(smmu, i, page) + offset;
writeq_relaxed(val, reg);
@@ -79,6 +87,7 @@ static void nvidia_smmu_write_reg64(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
static void nvidia_smmu_tlb_sync(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, int page,
int sync, int status)
{
+ struct nvidia_smmu *nvidia = to_nvidia_smmu(smmu);
unsigned int delay;
arm_smmu_writel(smmu, page, sync, 0);
@@ -90,7 +99,7 @@ static void nvidia_smmu_tlb_sync(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, int page,
u32 val = 0;
unsigned int i;
- for (i = 0; i < NUM_SMMU_INSTANCES; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < nvidia->num_instances; i++) {
void __iomem *reg;
reg = nvidia_smmu_page(smmu, i, page) + status;
@@ -112,9 +121,10 @@ static void nvidia_smmu_tlb_sync(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, int page,
static int nvidia_smmu_reset(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
{
+ struct nvidia_smmu *nvidia = to_nvidia_smmu(smmu);
unsigned int i;
- for (i = 0; i < NUM_SMMU_INSTANCES; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < nvidia->num_instances; i++) {
u32 val;
void __iomem *reg = nvidia_smmu_page(smmu, i, ARM_SMMU_GR0) +
ARM_SMMU_GR0_sGFSR;
@@ -157,8 +167,9 @@ static irqreturn_t nvidia_smmu_global_fault(int irq, void *dev)
unsigned int inst;
irqreturn_t ret = IRQ_NONE;
struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = dev;
+ struct nvidia_smmu *nvidia = to_nvidia_smmu(smmu);
- for (inst = 0; inst < NUM_SMMU_INSTANCES; inst++) {
+ for (inst = 0; inst < nvidia->num_instances; inst++) {
irqreturn_t irq_ret;
irq_ret = nvidia_smmu_global_fault_inst(irq, smmu, inst);
@@ -202,11 +213,13 @@ static irqreturn_t nvidia_smmu_context_fault(int irq, void *dev)
struct arm_smmu_device *smmu;
struct iommu_domain *domain = dev;
struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain;
+ struct nvidia_smmu *nvidia;
smmu_domain = container_of(domain, struct arm_smmu_domain, domain);
smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
+ nvidia = to_nvidia_smmu(smmu);
- for (inst = 0; inst < NUM_SMMU_INSTANCES; inst++) {
+ for (inst = 0; inst < nvidia->num_instances; inst++) {
irqreturn_t irq_ret;
/*
@@ -235,12 +248,16 @@ static const struct arm_smmu_impl nvidia_smmu_impl = {
.context_fault = nvidia_smmu_context_fault,
};
+static const struct arm_smmu_impl nvidia_smmu_single_impl = {
+};
+
struct arm_smmu_device *nvidia_smmu_impl_init(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
{
struct resource *res;
struct device *dev = smmu->dev;
struct nvidia_smmu *nvidia_smmu;
struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
+ unsigned int i;
nvidia_smmu = devm_krealloc(dev, smmu, sizeof(*nvidia_smmu), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!nvidia_smmu)
@@ -248,16 +265,24 @@ struct arm_smmu_device *nvidia_smmu_impl_init(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
/* Instance 0 is ioremapped by arm-smmu.c. */
nvidia_smmu->bases[0] = smmu->base;
+ nvidia_smmu->num_instances++;
- res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 1);
- if (!res)
- return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
+ for (i = 1; i < MAX_SMMU_INSTANCES; i++) {
+ res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, i);
+ if (!res)
+ break;
- nvidia_smmu->bases[1] = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
- if (IS_ERR(nvidia_smmu->bases[1]))
- return ERR_CAST(nvidia_smmu->bases[1]);
+ nvidia_smmu->bases[i] = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
+ if (IS_ERR(nvidia_smmu->bases[i]))
+ return ERR_CAST(nvidia_smmu->bases[i]);
+
+ nvidia_smmu->num_instances++;
+ }
- nvidia_smmu->smmu.impl = &nvidia_smmu_impl;
+ if (nvidia_smmu->num_instances == 1)
+ nvidia_smmu->smmu.impl = &nvidia_smmu_single_impl;
+ else
+ nvidia_smmu->smmu.impl = &nvidia_smmu_impl;
return &nvidia_smmu->smmu;
}
--
2.31.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-03 16:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-03 16:46 [PATCH v3 0/9] arm64: tegra: Prevent early SMMU faults Thierry Reding
2021-06-03 16:46 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] memory: tegra: Implement SID override programming Thierry Reding
2021-06-03 16:46 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add Tegra186 compatible string Thierry Reding
2021-06-18 19:47 ` Rob Herring
2021-06-21 6:46 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-06-21 14:11 ` Thierry Reding
2021-06-21 15:54 ` Will Deacon
2021-06-21 16:03 ` Thierry Reding
2021-06-03 16:46 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] iommu/arm-smmu: Implement ->probe_finalize() Thierry Reding
2021-06-15 18:01 ` Marek Szyprowski
2021-06-15 18:08 ` Robin Murphy
2021-06-15 18:12 ` Krishna Reddy
2021-06-15 18:21 ` Will Deacon
2021-06-15 19:50 ` Will Deacon
2021-06-03 16:46 ` Thierry Reding [this message]
2021-06-03 16:46 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] iommu/arm-smmu: tegra: Implement SID override programming Thierry Reding
2021-06-03 16:46 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] iommu/arm-smmu: Use Tegra implementation on Tegra186 Thierry Reding
2021-06-03 16:46 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] arm64: tegra: Use correct compatible string for Tegra186 SMMU Thierry Reding
2021-06-03 16:46 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] arm64: tegra: Hook up memory controller to SMMU on Tegra186 Thierry Reding
2021-06-03 16:46 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] arm64: tegra: Enable SMMU support on Tegra194 Thierry Reding
2021-06-03 19:51 ` (subset) [PATCH v3 0/9] arm64: tegra: Prevent early SMMU faults Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-06-11 6:48 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-06-11 12:05 ` Thierry Reding
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210603164632.1000458-5-thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--to=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).