From: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: ARM SoC Team <arm@kernel.org>, SoC Team <soc@kernel.org>,
ALKML <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] firmware: arm_ffa: Initial support for v5.14
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 08:21:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210615152149.GB11724@lx2k> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210614170856.rs7jrke3gvpmu4km@bogus>
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 06:08:56PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> Hi Olof,
>
> On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 10:58:38AM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > Hi ARM SoC Team,
> >
> > Please pull !
> >
> > This is a new driver pull request. One of the arm64 patch is being
> > pulled from a stable arm64 branch for-next/ffa as the other patches
> > are dependent of the same.
> >
> > Background
> > ----------
> > This has been on the list for almost a year now with changing requirements.
> > Initially Arm KVM wanted to use this via userspace interface in VMM to
> > communicate with VMs. But it was later dropped in favour of arch-agnostic
> > interface[1].
> >
> > Also there was some discussion on the dt-bindings which was dropped
> > completely. Though we need to workaround the lack of full discoveribility
> > in v1.0 spec, it is now being fixed for the next version of the spec.
> >
>
> I see that you have pulled quite a lot of drivers and other SoC code
> including my scmi and juno ones that were sent more recently than this
> one. Just thought of checking if this is still in queue ? Sorry for the
> nag but this has been on a list almost a year. We missed v5.13 due to
> DT binding controveries(for good reasons) and we really don't want to
> miss v5.14
I held off because I wanted to spend a few cycles on looking into it before
blindly merging it.
Are there any implemented users of this (on either side) today? We normally
don't merge a framework in the kernel without having at least one user of it
also available.
-Olof
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-15 19:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-01 9:58 [GIT PULL] firmware: arm_ffa: Initial support for v5.14 Sudeep Holla
2021-06-14 17:08 ` Sudeep Holla
2021-06-15 15:21 ` Olof Johansson [this message]
2021-06-15 15:34 ` Sudeep Holla
2021-06-15 16:47 ` Olof Johansson
2021-06-15 19:56 ` Sudeep Holla
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210615152149.GB11724@lx2k \
--to=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=arm@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=khilman@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=soc@kernel.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).