From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Salah Triki <salah.triki@gmail.com>,
fabrice.gasnier@foss.st.com, thierry.reding@gmail.com,
lee.jones@linaro.org, mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com,
alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] divide by 3*sizeof(u32) when computing array_size
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2021 10:19:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210713091954.GG22278@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210713063053.qqttzxlopvpnadj3@pengutronix.de>
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 08:30:53AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello Salah,
>
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 12:19:10AM +0100, Salah Triki wrote:
> > Divide by 3*sizeof(u32) when computing array_size, since stm32_breakinput
> > has 3 fields of type u32.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Salah Triki <salah.triki@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32.c
> > index 794ca5b02968..fb21bc2b2dd6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32.c
> > @@ -544,7 +544,7 @@ static int stm32_pwm_probe_breakinputs(struct stm32_pwm *priv,
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > priv->num_breakinputs = nb;
> > - array_size = nb * sizeof(struct stm32_breakinput) / sizeof(u32);
> > + array_size = nb * sizeof(struct stm32_breakinput) / (3 * sizeof(u32));
> > ret = of_property_read_u32_array(np, "st,breakinput",
> > (u32 *)priv->breakinputs, array_size);
> > if (ret)
>
> I agree with Philipp here; this looks strange and needs a better
> description.
>
> Looking a bit more in details:
>
> - priv->breakinputs has type struct stm32_breakinput[MAX_BREAKINPUT]
> - nb is in [0 .. MAX_BREAKINPUT]
> - sizeof(struct stm32_breakinput) == 3 * sizeof(u32)
> - of_property_read_u32_array reads $array_size u32 quantities
>
> so to read $nb members of type stm32_breakinput array_size must be a
> multiple of 3 which isn't given any more after your patch. This makes me
> believe your suggested change to be wrong.
I concur with your analysis. "array_size" is the number of u32 values
to read from DT. It is not the number of entries in priv->breakinputs.
I would also note that the code relies on there being no padding in
struct stm32_breakinput - it should be noted that a strict
interpretation of the C standard allows padding to be added anywhere
to a structure - at the start, end or between members.
Some further thoughts... DT is effectively an interface (we maintain
definitions of what we expect.) The way the code is structured,
"struct stm32_breakinput" defines that interface. Maybe this should
be commented, and maybe there should be a build time assert that
"sizeof(struct stm32_breakinput)" is "3 * sizeof(u32)" since the
code is relying on that property?
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-13 9:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-12 23:19 [PATCH] divide by 3*sizeof(u32) when computing array_size Salah Triki
2021-07-13 6:02 ` Philipp Hahn
2021-07-13 6:30 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-07-13 9:07 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-07-13 9:19 ` Russell King (Oracle) [this message]
2021-07-13 11:07 ` David Laight
2021-07-13 11:22 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2021-07-13 12:20 ` David Laight
2021-07-13 12:35 ` Russell King (Oracle)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210713091954.GG22278@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=fabrice.gasnier@foss.st.com \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=salah.triki@gmail.com \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).