From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-18.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 471C3C4338F for ; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 15:42:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1860160C51 for ; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 15:42:51 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 1860160C51 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:List-Subscribe:List-Help: List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:References:In-Reply-To: Message-Id:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=j2rNx0N6p2+183+Z7OkEU12hguoMV0oc1Wb6rMRMSqw=; b=tQH1Fi7Jj82Oo4 tVZHMCUw4qH0l6d0y3svEEW3MiWJcC9cc/0iUfoKCodlRaN2di0S4BfhZBb3lk7gK44jHXug1GpdD JZ0h6INSKz1U1AQB5mjCdPCBsO5FbpU5PSYaNh1LM9ltAvZZO4r53w2lJzMIL17iIg4mbVk3jcRuw sbQF21byQXkAyU7n0GpJpkYZ8H76mJd2dXTLRoy4SxcaLRAq76M2DfjoeCqq18pOPEe9GjDhUrv0N Uv3dVUe4cTU2/lIlfI/fATgBrsEuX8r3rPQYrIxB7XojfqMA+d0eziNvBjUG8NMtb3f51FeLjOese P8+k4i7jfAvRWcwWGoCA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1m6xI8-005Aai-9i; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 15:40:48 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1m6xGt-005A9t-LL for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 15:39:33 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ADB5142F; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 08:39:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 177B33F73D; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 08:39:26 -0700 (PDT) From: Andre Przywara To: Maxime Ripard , Chen-Yu Tsai , Jernej Skrabec Cc: Rob Herring , Icenowy Zheng , Samuel Holland , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com, linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ondrej Jirman , Alessandro Zummo , Alexandre Belloni , linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v8 06/11] rtc: sun6i: Add support for RTCs without external LOSCs Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 16:38:33 +0100 Message-Id: <20210723153838.6785-7-andre.przywara@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.14.1 In-Reply-To: <20210723153838.6785-1-andre.przywara@arm.com> References: <20210723153838.6785-1-andre.przywara@arm.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210723_083931_793553_9BB24588 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 17.96 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Some newer Allwinner RTCs (for instance the one in the H616 SoC) lack a pin for an external 32768 Hz oscillator. As a consequence, this LOSC can't be selected as the RTC clock source, and we must rely on the internal RC oscillator. To allow additions of clocks to the RTC node, add a feature bit to ignore any provided clocks for now (the current code would think this is the external LOSC). Later DTs and code can then for instance add the PLL based clock input, and older kernel won't get confused. Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara --- drivers/rtc/rtc-sun6i.c | 16 +++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-sun6i.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-sun6i.c index f0ee20bfdccb..ef2b1027ce4c 100644 --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-sun6i.c +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-sun6i.c @@ -134,6 +134,7 @@ struct sun6i_rtc_clk_data { unsigned int export_iosc : 1; unsigned int has_losc_en : 1; unsigned int has_auto_swt : 1; + unsigned int no_ext_losc : 1; }; #define RTC_LINEAR_DAY BIT(0) @@ -256,7 +257,7 @@ static void __init sun6i_rtc_clk_init(struct device_node *node, } /* Switch to the external, more precise, oscillator, if present */ - if (of_get_property(node, "clocks", NULL)) { + if (!rtc->data->no_ext_losc && of_get_property(node, "clocks", NULL)) { reg |= SUN6I_LOSC_CTRL_EXT_OSC; if (rtc->data->has_losc_en) reg |= SUN6I_LOSC_CTRL_EXT_LOSC_EN; @@ -282,14 +283,19 @@ static void __init sun6i_rtc_clk_init(struct device_node *node, } parents[0] = clk_hw_get_name(rtc->int_osc); - /* If there is no external oscillator, this will be NULL and ... */ - parents[1] = of_clk_get_parent_name(node, 0); + if (rtc->data->no_ext_losc) { + parents[1] = NULL; + init.num_parents = 1; + } else { + /* If there is no external oscillator, this will be NULL and */ + parents[1] = of_clk_get_parent_name(node, 0); + /* ... number of clock parents will be 1. */ + init.num_parents = of_clk_get_parent_count(node) + 1; + } rtc->hw.init = &init; init.parent_names = parents; - /* ... number of clock parents will be 1. */ - init.num_parents = of_clk_get_parent_count(node) + 1; of_property_read_string_index(node, "clock-output-names", 0, &init.name); -- 2.17.6 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel