From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 959E5C4338F for ; Sat, 24 Jul 2021 15:48:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EF0760E90 for ; Sat, 24 Jul 2021 15:48:01 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 5EF0760E90 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=Ozgd/wxeLVGxXDenEgffDjoNlDEJqDW28JpL5oUp7yI=; b=34wSR2ajjGQoW+ fPghbvafy1D3fM+Z3fO+do8PxGxfM8NGprTm5sMj6kNP7Jw+Jw1diG3NyrqKSzcigEeR9GNYSyo+F sBYWr+ETsXq+CXQ0BVWSw1q85S5tiHIHrt0BTbHSJCsaUAJiDxVIyjwSGbLCXjgpz9uUjTfj/n5/+ 3IIvP8BjP87Lp+Q3YF0tQ7SGixIyUbwAR6Zrdnc2xsEwAGdWJTV01XzT9tUXFl1OK5x42tziOJwMu AZPlM9TDHLw4ozk9l8YjZKeq630H4YkAaNtcP0maUaYgHZ36NSn/F/9b6wIL41hHIvhqYU6ZOeWn/ 7hPEBH41HepLKhFcZaFA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1m7Jqz-007Mkk-4f; Sat, 24 Jul 2021 15:46:17 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1m7Jqv-007MkM-Mc for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Sat, 24 Jul 2021 15:46:15 +0000 Received: from jic23-huawei (cpc108967-cmbg20-2-0-cust86.5-4.cable.virginm.net [81.101.6.87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D981360E8C; Sat, 24 Jul 2021 15:46:08 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2021 16:48:40 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Yizhuo Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen , Maxime Coquelin , Alexandre Torgue , Andy Shevchenko , Mark Brown , Mugilraj Dhavachelvan , Olivier Moysan , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Arnaud Pouliquen , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: adc: stm32-dfsdm: Fix the uninitialized use if regmap_read() fails Message-ID: <20210724164840.7381053b@jic23-huawei> In-Reply-To: <20210719195313.40341-1-yzhai003@ucr.edu> References: <20210719195313.40341-1-yzhai003@ucr.edu> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.18.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210724_084613_804542_0434EC76 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 23.41 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, 19 Jul 2021 19:53:11 +0000 Yizhuo wrote: > Inside function stm32_dfsdm_irq(), the variable "status", "int_en" > could be uninitialized if the regmap_read() fails and returns an error > code. However, they are directly used in the later context to decide > the control flow, which is potentially unsafe. > > Fixes: e2e6771c64625 ("IIO: ADC: add STM32 DFSDM sigma delta ADC support") > > Signed-off-by: Yizhuo Hi Yizhou I want to get some review of this from people familiar with the hardware as there is a small possibility your reordering might have introduced a problem. > --- > drivers/iio/adc/stm32-dfsdm-adc.c | 9 +++++++-- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-dfsdm-adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-dfsdm-adc.c > index 1cfefb3b5e56..d8b78aead942 100644 > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-dfsdm-adc.c > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-dfsdm-adc.c > @@ -1292,9 +1292,11 @@ static irqreturn_t stm32_dfsdm_irq(int irq, void *arg) > struct stm32_dfsdm_adc *adc = iio_priv(indio_dev); > struct regmap *regmap = adc->dfsdm->regmap; > unsigned int status, int_en; > + int ret; > > - regmap_read(regmap, DFSDM_ISR(adc->fl_id), &status); > - regmap_read(regmap, DFSDM_CR2(adc->fl_id), &int_en); Moving this later is only valid if there aren't any side effects. The current ordering is strange enough it makes me wonder if there might be! Jonathan > + ret = regmap_read(regmap, DFSDM_ISR(adc->fl_id), &status); > + if (ret) > + return IRQ_HANDLED; > > if (status & DFSDM_ISR_REOCF_MASK) { > /* Read the data register clean the IRQ status */ > @@ -1303,6 +1305,9 @@ static irqreturn_t stm32_dfsdm_irq(int irq, void *arg) > } > > if (status & DFSDM_ISR_ROVRF_MASK) { > + ret = regmap_read(regmap, DFSDM_CR2(adc->fl_id), &int_en); > + if (ret) > + return IRQ_HANDLED; > if (int_en & DFSDM_CR2_ROVRIE_MASK) > dev_warn(&indio_dev->dev, "Overrun detected\n"); > regmap_update_bits(regmap, DFSDM_ICR(adc->fl_id), _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel