From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, andreyknvl@gmail.com,
dvyukov@google.com, glider@google.com, pcc@google.com,
ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com, vincenzo.frascino@arm.com,
will@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: kasan: mte: remove redundant mte_report_once logic
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 19:54:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210727185418.GU13920@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210714143843.56537-4-mark.rutland@arm.com>
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 03:38:43PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> We have special logic to suppress MTE tag check fault reporting, based
> on a global `mte_report_once` and `reported` variables. These can be
> used to suppress calling kasan_report() when taking a tag check fault,
> but do not prevent taking the fault in the first place, nor does they
> affect the way we disable tag checks upon taking a fault.
>
> The core KASAN code already defaults to reporting a single fault, and
> has a `multi_shot` control to permit reporting multiple faults. The only
> place we transiently alter `mte_report_once` is in lib/test_kasan.c,
> where we also the `multi_shot` state as the same time. Thus
> `mte_report_once` and `reported` are redundant, and can be removed.
>
> When a tag check fault is taken, tag checking will be disabled by
> `do_tag_recovery` and must be explicitly re-enabled if desired. The test
> code does this by calling kasan_enable_tagging_sync().
>
> This patch removes the redundant mte_report_once() logic and associated
> variables.
The first "reported" variable was added to avoid calling kasan_report on
each CPU as we are lazily disabling tag checking when faults are
triggered. The subsequent mte_report_once() was added to avoid setting
"reported" during the kasan tests and missing the real faults later on.
I wasn't aware that kasan already has its own logic to prevent multiple
reports.
The kasan tests enable multi-shot first, so KASAN_BIT_REPORTED wouldn't
be set by report_enabled(). I think this patch makes sense.
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
(and I can queue them through the arm64 tree if I get the acks from the
kasan maintainers)
--
Catalin
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-27 18:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-14 14:38 [PATCH 0/3] arm64: MTE cleanups Mark Rutland
2021-07-14 14:38 ` [PATCH 1/3] arm64: mte: fix restoration of GCR_EL1 from suspend Mark Rutland
2021-07-14 14:38 ` [PATCH 2/3] arm64: kasan: mte: use a constant kernel GCR_EL1 value Mark Rutland
2021-07-27 18:29 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-08-02 11:57 ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-07-14 14:38 ` [PATCH 3/3] arm64: kasan: mte: remove redundant mte_report_once logic Mark Rutland
2021-07-27 18:54 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2021-07-30 23:01 ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-07-31 10:44 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-07-31 11:28 ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-07-31 11:49 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-08-02 11:52 ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-07-15 17:39 ` [PATCH 0/3] arm64: MTE cleanups Will Deacon
2021-08-02 18:07 ` (subset) " Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210727185418.GU13920@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=pcc@google.com \
--cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).