From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14A7BC4338F for ; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 16:19:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE8D060F9E for ; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 16:19:44 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org CE8D060F9E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=jIugx6br60rUgYllTqdpNS7ebkBE7OKTObQHLBujnrY=; b=PUZNaJpxO6HEVd xSI1IZ0NQzx2ejKhL4cGg8H6s7/+uMQ6+dLfRvfH48G2y02SFl3mkYz5NO1YdtrSuOm0uk7qARpwL 7e/T6s32nhH2mMDMZ35BouySG8vU+IkANRnz5mVePSPvXQUf6oBfmWYY0tbL1zA7/+V/CWPIx9GbY 7M4WEzUxwDy4yQ6JjkeaHWVQ6m+KuMnCxtZV9V/ELB/xc6MK1+zbXP6kR3Sl+5CbD7N78VNEp92ye NCFcz/yICmv2KD3sG6oQjqCSfPV9pEpG80Fi6Q0geaR67mnyqG3mw6r+F3+8F1Uf0izLJGPmYo+d+ Ylc/XHC4LR6Lkec07u4Q==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mAadk-00H8lo-Ds; Mon, 02 Aug 2021 16:18:08 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mAadf-00H8l7-U0 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 02 Aug 2021 16:18:05 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2FFE11D4; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 09:18:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from arm.com (usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0E9AF3F66F; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 09:18:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2021 17:16:39 +0100 From: Dave Martin To: Mark Brown Cc: Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64/sve: Make fpsimd_bind_task_to_cpu() static Message-ID: <20210802161639.GE25258@arm.com> References: <20210730165846.18558-1-broonie@kernel.org> <20210802155238.GD25258@arm.com> <20210802161201.GI4668@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210802161201.GI4668@sirena.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210802_091804_053898_D978A915 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 15.70 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Aug 02, 2021 at 05:12:01PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Aug 02, 2021 at 04:52:38PM +0100, Dave Martin wrote: > > > Rather makes me wonder > > why it wasn't static in the first place. This might have arisen from > > splitting out a backend function from something else that isn't static, > > or maybe I was trying to do this directy from KVM. The notion of non- > > task context that the KVM now uses is newer than the original SVE code. > > IIRC there was something like that in the older KVM SVE stuff but I > didn't go spelunking enough to figure it out specifically. Probably best not to ;) > > > Anyway, assuming you've grepped and tried to build with KVM at least > > (so, defconfig): > > grepped and my standard development builds include KVM. Fair enough, I would have been very surprised if you hadn't already done that. Cheers ---Dave _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel