From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74ED4C432BE for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 17:54:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41056610E8 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 17:54:34 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 41056610E8 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=C2IkWherXPuSHWtu9VNEjwNEYJitSX5tIuhiEGdpb6k=; b=jMN6wgDpKU00zN A6UifvjnOGe0E7dy/COyIm0N2OGAhojWSMvi+PDg1wA4EqVrmOZ4JLQo60Rb2iCRlIg9cc7loDDdx bKcYfoElkSjJecCeguQm0S5v1gAPRc1P8JZtYuqhYAsBXDk/n2NkdFNea6AtZD9TCL47TIUbxSMgg afIOg+4zIxCmUFvuKk9RvLQWEW1pbpLNWQ4AVcL0LKnNFmwVqKsF+k6WOj/sYdA36XEzpzx2ypKto YkT0ChHU5Knl3uLoYcYWadcvX2x2StDMKip1QHn+0i3x74ihoOr5GVzoYpRkIKw9djiv0ZcyzyHrE 4l+N8MEuv+Y1ETarKJRQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mIx4v-0088UE-Kg; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 17:52:45 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mIx4r-0088TS-Jc for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 17:52:42 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2803AD6E; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 10:52:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e120937-lin (unknown [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AFA453F66F; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 10:52:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 18:52:33 +0100 From: Cristian Marussi To: Florian Fainelli Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com, james.quinlan@broadcom.com, Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com, etienne.carriere@linaro.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, souvik.chakravarty@arm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/12] firmware: arm_scmi: Use new trace event scmi_xfer_response_wait Message-ID: <20210825175233.GH13160@e120937-lin> References: <20210824135941.38656-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com> <20210824135941.38656-6-cristian.marussi@arm.com> <2ffa7d65-21ef-433b-8a86-068df13950d2@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2ffa7d65-21ef-433b-8a86-068df13950d2@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210825_105241_715332_2084E2AC X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.70 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 06:31:13PM +0200, Florian Fainelli wrote: > > > On 8/24/2021 3:59 PM, Cristian Marussi wrote: > > Use new trace event to mark start of waiting for response section. > > > > Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi > Hi Florian, Thanks for the review and the feedback across this series. > Might be worth squashing into patch 4? > Yes indeed I never know for sure when to squash when stuff crosses subsystems/maintaners boundaries. Thanks, Cristian _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel