[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 3/8] pwm: rockchip: Don't modify HW state in .remove() callback

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 3/8] pwm: rockchip: Don't modify HW state in .remove() callback

[Sasha Levin]

From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>

[ Upstream commit 9d768cd7fd42bb0be16f36aec48548fca5260759 ]

A consumer is expected to disable a PWM before calling pwm_put(). And if
they didn't there is hopefully a good reason (or the consumer needs
fixing). Also if disabling an enabled PWM was the right thing to do,
this should better be done in the framework instead of in each low level
driver.

Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/pwm/pwm-rockchip.c | 14 --------------
 1 file changed, 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-rockchip.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-rockchip.c
index 3b8da7b0091b..1f3079562b38 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-rockchip.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-rockchip.c
@@ -382,20 +382,6 @@ static int rockchip_pwm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct rockchip_pwm_chip *pc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
 
-	/*
-	 * Disable the PWM clk before unpreparing it if the PWM device is still
-	 * running. This should only happen when the last PWM user left it
-	 * enabled, or when nobody requested a PWM that was previously enabled
-	 * by the bootloader.
-	 *
-	 * FIXME: Maybe the core should disable all PWM devices in
-	 * pwmchip_remove(). In this case we'd only have to call
-	 * clk_unprepare() after pwmchip_remove().
-	 *
-	 */
-	if (pwm_is_enabled(pc->chip.pwms))
-		clk_disable(pc->clk);
-
 	clk_unprepare(pc->pclk);
 	clk_unprepare(pc->clk);
 
-- 
2.30.2


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 4/8] pwm: stm32-lp: Don't modify HW state in .remove() callback

[Sasha Levin]

From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>

[ Upstream commit d44084c93427bb0a9261432db1a8ca76a42d805e ]

A consumer is expected to disable a PWM before calling pwm_put(). And if
they didn't there is hopefully a good reason (or the consumer needs
fixing). Also if disabling an enabled PWM was the right thing to do,
this should better be done in the framework instead of in each low level
driver.

Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32-lp.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32-lp.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32-lp.c
index 134c14621ee0..945a8b2b8564 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32-lp.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32-lp.c
@@ -225,8 +225,6 @@ static int stm32_pwm_lp_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct stm32_pwm_lp *priv = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
 
-	pwm_disable(&priv->chip.pwms[0]);
-
 	return pwmchip_remove(&priv->chip);
 }
 
-- 
2.30.2


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel