From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20F17C433F5 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 15:23:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFFBE6140F for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 15:23:57 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org CFFBE6140F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-Id:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=lt3ks5pIQTyRxv8HISNy9KMfP8XkEnjyOqSfntsK6HI=; b=cP2sRQtz0AWMIw sIwjTcJVb+DdWx+9jM1HP5T80sjr2Zk8oCwo2PG94Y+a+4yMQ60wnecA4Q09wsil4FMLNadp6wGxa 0NWj/w6Z9EUcAnNTUYmnyvH6w8osrBVQH11o3+qszbDpY98Q4gAXL7BMkI+FM78NPGr9cy2GGG1gs xpWxtsiy/wxql1Il351TjhUTw5HT38lJuWDN1Byfwi0iI76VLlAUvA4g+48e6/N3vd8BsMRp5D16J EcZ0+jCliQE+7naWnabSecVgt82FOv6VgxdmsszPn8Rjht/ACS85E9ojwBfnqYpEAtAIo5YOfpFqy 53xtnGSTJhEvJpXAUm3Q==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mVbPH-00BWzY-5b; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 15:22:03 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mVbOR-00BWnl-IX for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 15:21:12 +0000 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B755260E90; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 15:21:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1632928871; bh=hobP6jAeZx6QQ7Ydf7I7XKHrEPYgz0Kcb2X81UWdEzg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=rAnsW+/TIn7yqICiV7iDnrNvt0wQKf3YWAra0TmD9IjN86NntajbbmC0hw/CURvnM PvD2E9aDInAgphyreNzQHnAoA36uf2KdRHI2ut+zt/1BOCiAfHB2pB7fFTzzJb8DHc 6fTCOFOzXhxkkXz2f9l/eL/Wvlt3qHdaOjoycVdt7ZIotMgj2Ybd/WiM/ugoPyRYXO DB6XAL5O6Usnxa3AqjF1nmvBIFNdOu3ZkV8XzCbV3lQv7PNpdFLnkiwwZneErEa84g 8iWK4y4BuqHp48oRwJMDWgc8oB0UZcj+sT1N9x1D5jKCeZYRtewqEYvjhphw+lNdPc 4aTj6hGxhPNyg== From: Mark Brown To: Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Shuah Khan , Shuah Khan Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, misono.tomohiro@fujitsu.com, Mark Brown , Tomohiro Misono Subject: [PATCH v3 4/4] selftests: arm64: Verify that all possible vector lengths are handled Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 16:19:25 +0100 Message-Id: <20210929151925.9601-5-broonie@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20210929151925.9601-1-broonie@kernel.org> References: <20210929151925.9601-1-broonie@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Developer-Signature: v=1; a=openpgp-sha256; l=3241; h=from:subject; bh=hobP6jAeZx6QQ7Ydf7I7XKHrEPYgz0Kcb2X81UWdEzg=; b=owEBbQGS/pANAwAKASTWi3JdVIfQAcsmYgBhVIP7Fn17ZOJa3L5PcYWuX+0Qn0CBOhU1UrioNDG0 AFh7nqSJATMEAAEKAB0WIQSt5miqZ1cYtZ/in+ok1otyXVSH0AUCYVSD+wAKCRAk1otyXVSH0FXnB/ 0Z31Lf97w/PUE84vk/vYjxF665UQQCW+tr0sSFdairDNjmq0xQRAAbmfYddgzlmY3hvI6HQ8J4PXiF CqsS5a738kvXrlCa20N+pYeYm3cyP9mT31+9+yfTj//Tx3kqXHgHJmVSPDN+BA/uJTXBZ3Oo5zvBdz uoYh+5TfKbijuaWagurdXFWBM2VaUIKb3UaSmUUou0IKRpRlgngOgN3Dnn9jZtWi29VykK+qYufuQv p+rlJLCu9ykSNr3d/T6FcF0kGt/TTkS8eAGr29DvZ0UNA9FyOh6Q5b9sJUj+QWAlSu/e6EsikrinWb C/GWfDmJGSij4DNEJXgKIlo+SWORiz X-Developer-Key: i=broonie@kernel.org; a=openpgp; fpr=3F2568AAC26998F9E813A1C5C3F436CA30F5D8EB X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210929_082111_676125_08311583 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 17.96 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org As part of the enumeration interface for setting vector lengths it is valid to set vector lengths not supported in the system, these will be rounded to a supported vector length and returned from the prctl(). Add a test which exercises this for every valid vector length and makes sure that the return value is as expected and that this is reflected in the actual system state. Signed-off-by: Mark Brown Reviewed-by: Tomohiro Misono --- tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/vec-syscfg.c | 77 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 77 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/vec-syscfg.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/vec-syscfg.c index 9d6ac843e651..272b888e018e 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/vec-syscfg.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/vec-syscfg.c @@ -540,6 +540,82 @@ static void prctl_set_onexec(struct vec_data *data) file_write_integer(data->default_vl_file, data->default_vl); } +/* For each VQ verify that setting via prctl() does the right thing */ +static void prctl_set_all_vqs(struct vec_data *data) +{ + int ret, vq, vl, new_vl; + int errors = 0; + + if (!data->min_vl || !data->max_vl) { + ksft_test_result_skip("%s Failed to enumerate VLs, not testing VL setting\n", + data->name); + return; + } + + for (vq = SVE_VQ_MIN; vq <= SVE_VQ_MAX; vq++) { + vl = sve_vl_from_vq(vq); + + /* Attempt to set the VL */ + ret = prctl(data->prctl_set, vl); + if (ret < 0) { + errors++; + ksft_print_msg("%s prctl set failed for %d: %d (%s)\n", + data->name, vl, + errno, strerror(errno)); + continue; + } + + new_vl = ret & PR_SVE_VL_LEN_MASK; + + /* Check that we actually have the reported new VL */ + if (data->rdvl() != new_vl) { + ksft_print_msg("Set %s VL %d but RDVL reports %d\n", + data->name, new_vl, data->rdvl()); + errors++; + } + + /* Was that the VL we asked for? */ + if (new_vl == vl) + continue; + + /* Should round up to the minimum VL if below it */ + if (vl < data->min_vl) { + if (new_vl != data->min_vl) { + ksft_print_msg("%s VL %d returned %d not minimum %d\n", + data->name, vl, new_vl, + data->min_vl); + errors++; + } + + continue; + } + + /* Should round down to maximum VL if above it */ + if (vl > data->max_vl) { + if (new_vl != data->max_vl) { + ksft_print_msg("%s VL %d returned %d not maximum %d\n", + data->name, vl, new_vl, + data->max_vl); + errors++; + } + + continue; + } + + /* Otherwise we should've rounded down */ + if (!(new_vl < vl)) { + ksft_print_msg("%s VL %d returned %d, did not round down\n", + data->name, vl, new_vl); + errors++; + + continue; + } + } + + ksft_test_result(errors == 0, "%s prctl() set all VLs, %d errors\n", + data->name, errors); +} + typedef void (*test_type)(struct vec_data *); static const test_type tests[] = { @@ -557,6 +633,7 @@ static const test_type tests[] = { prctl_set_no_child, prctl_set_for_child, prctl_set_onexec, + prctl_set_all_vqs, }; int main(void) -- 2.20.1 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel