public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <mingchuang.qiao@mediatek.com>
To: <bhelgaas@google.com>, <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Cc: <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	 <mingchuang.qiao@mediatek.com>, <haijun.liu@mediatek.com>,
	<lambert.wang@mediatek.com>, <kerun.zhu@mediatek.com>,
	<rjw@rjwysocki.net>, <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	<utkarsh.h.patel@intel.com>, <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	<rajatja@google.com>
Subject: [v5] PCI: Avoid unsync of LTR mechanism configuration
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 15:56:14 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211012075614.54576-1-mingchuang.qiao@mediatek.com> (raw)

From: Mingchuang Qiao <mingchuang.qiao@mediatek.com>

In bus scan flow, the "LTR Mechanism Enable" bit of DEVCTL2 register is
configured in pci_configure_ltr(). If device and bridge both support LTR
mechanism, the "LTR Mechanism Enable" bit of device and bridge will be
enabled in DEVCTL2 register. And pci_dev->ltr_path will be set as 1.

If PCIe link goes down, the "LTR Mechanism Enable" bit of bridge will 
change to 0 according to PCIe r5.0, sec 7.5.3.16. However, the ->ltr_path 
of bridge is still set.

Following shows two scenarios of this LTR issue:

-scenario of device restore
 -- bridge LTR enabled
 -- device LTR enabled
 -- reset device
 -- link goes down, bridge disables LTR
 -- link comes back up, LTR disabled in both bridge and device
 -- restore device state, including LTR enable
 -- device sends LTR message
 -- bridge reports Unsupported Request

-scenario of device hot-remove/hot-add
 -- bridge LTR enabled
 -- device LTR enabled
 -- hot-remove device
 -- link goes down, bridge disables LTR
 -- hot-add device and link comes back up
 -- scan device, set LTR enable bit of device
 -- device sends LTR message
 -- bridge reports Unsupported Request

This issue was noticed by AER log as following shows:
pcieport 0000:00:1d.0: AER: Uncorrected (Non-Fatal) error received: id=00e8
pcieport 0000:00:1d.0: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Uncorrected (Non-Fatal), 
type=Transaction Layer, id=00e8(Requester ID)
pcieport 0000:00:1d.0:   device [8086:9d18] error 
status/mask=00100000/00010000
pcieport 0000:00:1d.0:    [20] Unsupported Request    (First)

It was also noticed when PCIe devices (thunderbolt docks) were hot removed 
from chromebooks, and then hot-plugged back again. Once hotplugged back, 
the newer Intel chromebooks fail to go into S0ix low power state because 
of this LTR issue.(https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-pci/patch/
20210204095125.9212-1-mingchuang.qiao@mediatek.com/)

To resolve this issue, check and re-configure "LTR Mechanism Enable" bit
of bridge to make "LTR Mechanism Enable" bit match ltr_path value in
following conditions.
   -before configuring device's LTR for hot-remove/hot-add
   -before restoring device's DEVCTL2 register when restore device state

Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mingchuang Qiao <mingchuang.qiao@mediatek.com>
---
changes of v5
 -add more details in commit message
changes of v4
 -fix typo of commit message
 -rename: pci_reconfigure_bridge_ltr()->pci_bridge_reconfigure_ltr()
changes of v3
 -call pci_reconfigure_bridge_ltr() in probe.c
changes of v2
 -modify patch description
 -reconfigure bridge's LTR before restoring device DEVCTL2 register
---
 drivers/pci/pci.c   | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/pci/pci.h   |  1 +
 drivers/pci/probe.c | 13 ++++++++++---
 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
index b9fecc25d213..6bf65d295331 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
@@ -1437,6 +1437,24 @@ static int pci_save_pcie_state(struct pci_dev *dev)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+void pci_bridge_reconfigure_ltr(struct pci_dev *dev)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_PCIEASPM
+	struct pci_dev *bridge;
+	u32 ctl;
+
+	bridge = pci_upstream_bridge(dev);
+	if (bridge && bridge->ltr_path) {
+		pcie_capability_read_dword(bridge, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2, &ctl);
+		if (!(ctl & PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2_LTR_EN)) {
+			pci_dbg(bridge, "re-enabling LTR\n");
+			pcie_capability_set_word(bridge, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2,
+						 PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2_LTR_EN);
+		}
+	}
+#endif
+}
+
 static void pci_restore_pcie_state(struct pci_dev *dev)
 {
 	int i = 0;
@@ -1447,6 +1465,13 @@ static void pci_restore_pcie_state(struct pci_dev *dev)
 	if (!save_state)
 		return;
 
+	/*
+	 * Downstream ports reset the LTR enable bit when link goes down.
+	 * Check and re-configure the bit here before restoring device.
+	 * PCIe r5.0, sec 7.5.3.16.
+	 */
+	pci_bridge_reconfigure_ltr(dev);
+
 	cap = (u16 *)&save_state->cap.data[0];
 	pcie_capability_write_word(dev, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL, cap[i++]);
 	pcie_capability_write_word(dev, PCI_EXP_LNKCTL, cap[i++]);
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.h b/drivers/pci/pci.h
index 5c59365092fa..b3a5e5287cb7 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci.h
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci.h
@@ -111,6 +111,7 @@ void pci_free_cap_save_buffers(struct pci_dev *dev);
 bool pci_bridge_d3_possible(struct pci_dev *dev);
 void pci_bridge_d3_update(struct pci_dev *dev);
 void pci_bridge_wait_for_secondary_bus(struct pci_dev *dev);
+void pci_bridge_reconfigure_ltr(struct pci_dev *dev);
 
 static inline void pci_wakeup_event(struct pci_dev *dev)
 {
diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
index 953f15abc850..ade055e9fb58 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
@@ -2132,9 +2132,16 @@ static void pci_configure_ltr(struct pci_dev *dev)
 	 * Complex and all intermediate Switches indicate support for LTR.
 	 * PCIe r4.0, sec 6.18.
 	 */
-	if (pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT ||
-	    ((bridge = pci_upstream_bridge(dev)) &&
-	      bridge->ltr_path)) {
+	if (pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT) {
+		pcie_capability_set_word(dev, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2,
+					 PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2_LTR_EN);
+		dev->ltr_path = 1;
+		return;
+	}
+
+	bridge = pci_upstream_bridge(dev);
+	if (bridge && bridge->ltr_path) {
+		pci_bridge_reconfigure_ltr(dev);
 		pcie_capability_set_word(dev, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2,
 					 PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2_LTR_EN);
 		dev->ltr_path = 1;
-- 
2.18.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

             reply	other threads:[~2021-10-12  8:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-12  7:56 mingchuang.qiao [this message]
2021-10-19 21:19 ` [v5] PCI: Avoid unsync of LTR mechanism configuration Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211012075614.54576-1-mingchuang.qiao@mediatek.com \
    --to=mingchuang.qiao@mediatek.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=haijun.liu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=kerun.zhu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=lambert.wang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=rajatja@google.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=utkarsh.h.patel@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox