From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4396C433F5 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 17:28:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DA19610EA for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 17:28:22 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 6DA19610EA Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=LHam8mc08IlIM0XPrCHc165az2AM/tUbCxGsS2Z+gJg=; b=iaUAXGlHuTdwJI ETXijjpnyNQCZzMZfALbNLjA4pI5OVPsbAwlztmt+PWOE6NqWa6v4Q7JIAis2n4PNtXIJ0a+Dwuyb eORxEt6eJgPjQ6UlYO6E+NMZsWrLh7D9F+hdX4umQZk+6osQ+vzi+9Xpiy7cVp0xyqmCOagOdGqmr T4sIfTirAxohyFPagX5zCf6lboOKM26ltON10d/gRGXEzZvYTRdfIFG9LzA6BIQsY+AzMH9cGQigc QEw2UonpCyS0PnqXCMlED+LkNuDB6xOiIhRQ3WvlTfFfgrwk9L+DMnp4V1P9HTi9v27Q9/n1zbnlZ C8T0SyCkma13uROvf1+Q==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mai0v-0008ob-CO; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 17:26:01 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mai0r-0008nh-Cu for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 17:25:59 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA6C01063; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 10:25:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from C02TD0UTHF1T.local (unknown [10.57.73.189]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EA6E43F694; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 10:25:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 18:25:38 +0100 From: Mark Rutland To: Rob Herring , Peter Zijlstra Cc: Will Deacon , Ingo Molnar , Catalin Marinas , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Jiri Olsa , Kan Liang , Ian Rogers , Alexander Shishkin , honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com, Zachary.Leaf@arm.com, Raphael Gault , Jonathan Cameron , Namhyung Kim , Itaru Kitayama , Vince Weaver , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Borislav Petkov , x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/5] x86: perf: Move RDPMC event flag to a common definition Message-ID: <20211013172529.GA5400@C02TD0UTHF1T.local> References: <20210914204800.3945732-1-robh@kernel.org> <20210914204800.3945732-2-robh@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210914204800.3945732-2-robh@kernel.org> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20211013_102557_541753_8731DF19 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 28.55 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Rob, On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 03:47:56PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > In preparation to enable user counter access on arm64 and to move some > of the user access handling to perf core, create a common event flag for > user counter access and convert x86 to use it. > > Since the architecture specific flags start at the LSB, starting at the > MSB for common flags. Minor comments below (definition rename, and a comment block), but with those: Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland Peter, are you happy with this from the x86 side? > Cc: Peter Zijlstra > Cc: Ingo Molnar > Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo > Cc: Mark Rutland > Cc: Alexander Shishkin > Cc: Jiri Olsa > Cc: Namhyung Kim > Cc: Kan Liang > Cc: Thomas Gleixner > Cc: Borislav Petkov > Cc: x86@kernel.org > Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" > Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring > --- > arch/x86/events/core.c | 10 +++++----- > arch/x86/events/perf_event.h | 2 +- > include/linux/perf_event.h | 2 ++ > 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c > index 2a57dbed4894..2bd50fc061e1 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/events/core.c > +++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c > @@ -2469,7 +2469,7 @@ static int x86_pmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event) > > if (READ_ONCE(x86_pmu.attr_rdpmc) && > !(event->hw.flags & PERF_X86_EVENT_LARGE_PEBS)) > - event->hw.flags |= PERF_X86_EVENT_RDPMC_ALLOWED; > + event->hw.flags |= PERF_EVENT_FLAG_USER_READ_CNT; > > return err; > } > @@ -2503,7 +2503,7 @@ void perf_clear_dirty_counters(void) > > static void x86_pmu_event_mapped(struct perf_event *event, struct mm_struct *mm) > { > - if (!(event->hw.flags & PERF_X86_EVENT_RDPMC_ALLOWED)) > + if (!(event->hw.flags & PERF_EVENT_FLAG_USER_READ_CNT)) > return; > > /* > @@ -2524,7 +2524,7 @@ static void x86_pmu_event_mapped(struct perf_event *event, struct mm_struct *mm) > > static void x86_pmu_event_unmapped(struct perf_event *event, struct mm_struct *mm) > { > - if (!(event->hw.flags & PERF_X86_EVENT_RDPMC_ALLOWED)) > + if (!(event->hw.flags & PERF_EVENT_FLAG_USER_READ_CNT)) > return; > > if (atomic_dec_and_test(&mm->context.perf_rdpmc_allowed)) > @@ -2535,7 +2535,7 @@ static int x86_pmu_event_idx(struct perf_event *event) > { > struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw; > > - if (!(hwc->flags & PERF_X86_EVENT_RDPMC_ALLOWED)) > + if (!(hwc->flags & PERF_EVENT_FLAG_USER_READ_CNT)) > return 0; > > if (is_metric_idx(hwc->idx)) > @@ -2718,7 +2718,7 @@ void arch_perf_update_userpage(struct perf_event *event, > userpg->cap_user_time = 0; > userpg->cap_user_time_zero = 0; > userpg->cap_user_rdpmc = > - !!(event->hw.flags & PERF_X86_EVENT_RDPMC_ALLOWED); > + !!(event->hw.flags & PERF_EVENT_FLAG_USER_READ_CNT); > userpg->pmc_width = x86_pmu.cntval_bits; > > if (!using_native_sched_clock() || !sched_clock_stable()) > diff --git a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h > index e3ac05c97b5e..49f68b15745f 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h > +++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h > @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ static inline bool constraint_match(struct event_constraint *c, u64 ecode) > #define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_NA_HSW 0x0010 /* haswell style datala, unknown */ > #define PERF_X86_EVENT_EXCL 0x0020 /* HT exclusivity on counter */ > #define PERF_X86_EVENT_DYNAMIC 0x0040 /* dynamic alloc'd constraint */ > -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_RDPMC_ALLOWED 0x0080 /* grant rdpmc permission */ > + > #define PERF_X86_EVENT_EXCL_ACCT 0x0100 /* accounted EXCL event */ > #define PERF_X86_EVENT_AUTO_RELOAD 0x0200 /* use PEBS auto-reload */ > #define PERF_X86_EVENT_LARGE_PEBS 0x0400 /* use large PEBS */ > diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h > index fe156a8170aa..12debf008d39 100644 > --- a/include/linux/perf_event.h > +++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h > @@ -142,6 +142,8 @@ struct hw_perf_event { > int event_base_rdpmc; > int idx; > int last_cpu; > + > +#define PERF_EVENT_FLAG_USER_READ_CNT 0x80000000 I realise this matches the style of PERF_HES_* and PERF_EF_*. but could we please arrange this like the PERF_PMU_CAP_* definitions, and move this immediately before the struct hw_perf_event defintion, with a comment block, e.g. /* * hw_perf_event::flag values * * PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH bits are reserved for architecture-specific * usage. */ #define PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH 0x0000ffff #define PERF_EVENT_FLAG_USER_READ_CNT 0x80000000 Thanks, Mark. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel