From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C677C433FE for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 11:06:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15FA961260 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 11:06:09 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 15FA961260 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=rW1DJmmvkj/Pz543ppp+e3FrTBnOxGAyYm88H0oG9j4=; b=EFmHo6zdjIjccc jZzf8fsAIL/XPjHh9+l49Tt5ynBiVrf8opgcs7QlnK2uQnAdN63MDObZd9zbD0yVJV6COb1MZbLR2 Yvxshlh/zp3hKML4mr2JuM+Q7OHfjL+2/3mJplPFYGRO8OhWKfAKbdd1608ujX98eGKIyHq7qAMAk DbL0CqIrauGpqFqB5HTQBgQueBCrpzHMNZKETsfubdLTc099lHhjlWuNfPK8cXexSOtp/ECROCP3i sNY6dso3IEkqqL/PCkNO2X0ZwuUU1t0vsN+8MYpScvpsIv09/oeReo7jLisHHnp6Pf6aHeU2HxLTm wH427l7VpBLDHQr+iLgA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mcQRH-00FEPB-Nv; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 11:04:20 +0000 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mcQ8n-00F65P-EM for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 10:45:14 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1634553910; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=1uyCEHCiTKNcqpUO1aFErGSv7mBpXKpc6cxyusKebck=; b=VDwMAlHPj1TREGSw72d4kTXjfN2/5GmI34suUagaQBI0tLgcwhnP4WVpVwVjBYz6rl4YdE z7nVKQUrIRG9/WUw+vTH/CuR6X6/FDPO1RqxlFxrNeCfWN6E2ubAxqFR/9VUYfwbHLvh6F wGI97KZKDVCIZuAOiZ9WdY0vKGZ5TBc= Received: from mail-ed1-f72.google.com (mail-ed1-f72.google.com [209.85.208.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-577-LeCZL6x4OL2WJqLcm39-UA-1; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 06:45:09 -0400 X-MC-Unique: LeCZL6x4OL2WJqLcm39-UA-1 Received: by mail-ed1-f72.google.com with SMTP id cy14-20020a0564021c8e00b003db8c9a6e30so13979736edb.1 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 03:45:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=1uyCEHCiTKNcqpUO1aFErGSv7mBpXKpc6cxyusKebck=; b=lgq19brWEHm9UO771OTIVyESNBDfBhc373JiZm/Kh7TuOvsj0OxlDZIVzwkEWA5sIC WiKZ0MH1XhT7bNObNBJHkScM0Z+TxVnewBcLQ68oeGjB+PQinb+n1hbwiblwRFdRgpNJ BTZswAstAqh3AohmAepObUQZ+t4pJ2q12vSfdJIY2F7QEs/DtW79bZyTxvKpkghAceM7 5wcUezg8z0jF2zkL72iEXkveaw0DbOtAt48WhlBRphfkrmry15qqjQgvqe8rUIR9ICcB bT+tU3VXVv1BxQrGcU5i5fMaKybJ6sRwqZ7Xf1oFhpIY7G+KkBoDLKq33yaKev8YEz+z JUbg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5334e9VI+pYl5RvhSnFu96tixNhF8YVpyjTFUpeiRo3Qw0G9jplo nz/ynWWUyPyP9uwXho/z4SEHZBIblyTlH3KRFlwL0r76/5ndU+//zUljv9mjWjeSejOhaOfYxn7 9GKxwNYaf/4ufPdVOrCuX/3h4E6jkuMrlTKk= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:2606:: with SMTP id h6mr29039234ejc.301.1634553907943; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 03:45:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz0/tbTFUMN7jqyIWaGL6Z8CJvBwotkH9WB6m3QCyklG9WBS81dg1B+4X6yxbU7dGtDKT0pcQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:2606:: with SMTP id h6mr29039202ejc.301.1634553907748; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 03:45:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gator.home (cst2-174-2.cust.vodafone.cz. [31.30.174.2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v13sm10285018edl.69.2021.10.18.03.45.06 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 18 Oct 2021 03:45:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 12:45:05 +0200 From: Andrew Jones To: Fuad Tabba Cc: Marc Zyngier , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, will@kernel.org, james.morse@arm.com, alexandru.elisei@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, oupton@google.com, qperret@google.com, kernel-team@android.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/22] KVM: arm64: Fixed features for protected VMs Message-ID: <20211018104505.52jvpuhxkbstzerg@gator.home> References: <20211010145636.1950948-12-tabba@google.com> <20211013120346.2926621-1-maz@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=drjones@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Disposition: inline X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20211018_034513_627405_58DCDB40 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 20.92 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 10:51:54AM +0100, Fuad Tabba wrote: > Hi Marc, > > On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 1:04 PM Marc Zyngier wrote: > > > > This is an update on Fuad's series[1]. > > > > Instead of going going back and forth over a series that has seen a > > fair few versions, I've opted for simply writing a set of fixes on > > top, hopefully greatly simplifying the handling of most registers, and > > moving things around to suit my own taste (just because I can). > > > > I won't be reposting the initial 11 patches, which is why this series > > in is reply to patch 11. > > Thanks for this series. I've reviewed, built it, and tested it with a > dummy protected VM (since we don't have proper protected VMs yet), > which initializes some of the relevant protected VMs metadata as well > as its control registers. So fwiw: > > Reviewed-by: Fuad Tabba > > And to whatever extent possible at this stage: > Tested-by: Fuad Tabba > Hi Fuad, Out of curiosity, when testing pKVM, what VMM do you use? Also, can you describe what a "dummy pVM" is? Is it a just pVM which is not actually protected? How similar is a pVM to a typical VIRTIO-using VM? Actually, maybe I should just ask if there are instructions for playing with pKVM somewhere that I could get a pointer to. Thanks, drew _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel