* [PATCH v2 1/5] KVM: arm64: Move SVE state mapping at HYP to finalize-time
2021-10-18 21:11 [PATCH v2 0/5] KVM: arm64: Reorganise vcpu first run Marc Zyngier
@ 2021-10-18 21:11 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-10-18 21:11 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] KVM: arm64: Move kvm_arch_vcpu_run_pid_change() out of line Marc Zyngier
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2021-10-18 21:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kvmarm, kvm, linux-arm-kernel
Cc: James Morse, Suzuki K Poulose, Alexandru Elisei, Quentin Perret,
Will Deacon, Andrew Jones, kernel-team
We currently map the SVE state to HYP on detection of a PID change.
Although this matches what we do for FPSIMD, this is pretty pointless
for SVE, as the buffer is per-vcpu and has nothing to do with the
thread that is being run.
Move the mapping of the SVE state to finalize-time, which is where
we allocate the state memory, and thus the most logical place to
do this.
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c | 11 -----------
arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c | 11 ++++++++++-
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c
index 5621020b28de..62c0d78da7be 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c
@@ -43,17 +43,6 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_run_map_fp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
if (ret)
goto error;
- if (vcpu->arch.sve_state) {
- void *sve_end;
-
- sve_end = vcpu->arch.sve_state + vcpu_sve_state_size(vcpu);
-
- ret = create_hyp_mappings(vcpu->arch.sve_state, sve_end,
- PAGE_HYP);
- if (ret)
- goto error;
- }
-
vcpu->arch.host_thread_info = kern_hyp_va(ti);
vcpu->arch.host_fpsimd_state = kern_hyp_va(fpsimd);
error:
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
index 5ce36b0a3343..9e904a9244c1 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
@@ -94,6 +94,8 @@ static int kvm_vcpu_finalize_sve(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
void *buf;
unsigned int vl;
+ size_t reg_sz;
+ int ret;
vl = vcpu->arch.sve_max_vl;
@@ -106,10 +108,17 @@ static int kvm_vcpu_finalize_sve(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
vl > SVE_VL_ARCH_MAX))
return -EIO;
- buf = kzalloc(SVE_SIG_REGS_SIZE(sve_vq_from_vl(vl)), GFP_KERNEL);
+ reg_sz = vcpu_sve_state_size(vcpu);
+ buf = kzalloc(reg_sz, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!buf)
return -ENOMEM;
+ ret = create_hyp_mappings(buf, buf + reg_sz, PAGE_HYP);
+ if (ret) {
+ kfree(buf);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
vcpu->arch.sve_state = buf;
vcpu->arch.flags |= KVM_ARM64_VCPU_SVE_FINALIZED;
return 0;
--
2.30.2
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [PATCH v2 2/5] KVM: arm64: Move kvm_arch_vcpu_run_pid_change() out of line
2021-10-18 21:11 [PATCH v2 0/5] KVM: arm64: Reorganise vcpu first run Marc Zyngier
2021-10-18 21:11 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] KVM: arm64: Move SVE state mapping at HYP to finalize-time Marc Zyngier
@ 2021-10-18 21:11 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-10-18 21:11 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] KVM: arm64: Restructure the point where has_run_once is advertised Marc Zyngier
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2021-10-18 21:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kvmarm, kvm, linux-arm-kernel
Cc: James Morse, Suzuki K Poulose, Alexandru Elisei, Quentin Perret,
Will Deacon, Andrew Jones, kernel-team
Having kvm_arch_vcpu_run_pid_change() inline doesn't bring anything
to the table. Move it next to kvm_vcpu_first_run_init(), which will
be convenient for what is next to come.
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 7 +------
arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 5 +++++
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index f8be56d5342b..d7107d627c54 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -748,12 +748,7 @@ static inline bool kvm_pmu_counter_deferred(struct perf_event_attr *attr)
void kvm_arch_vcpu_load_debug_state_flags(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
void kvm_arch_vcpu_put_debug_state_flags(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
-#ifdef CONFIG_KVM /* Avoid conflicts with core headers if CONFIG_KVM=n */
-static inline int kvm_arch_vcpu_run_pid_change(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
-{
- return kvm_arch_vcpu_run_map_fp(vcpu);
-}
-
+#ifdef CONFIG_KVM
void kvm_set_pmu_events(u32 set, struct perf_event_attr *attr);
void kvm_clr_pmu_events(u32 clr);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
index fe102cd2e518..ccb59ac54976 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
@@ -583,6 +583,11 @@ static void update_vmid(struct kvm_vmid *vmid)
spin_unlock(&kvm_vmid_lock);
}
+int kvm_arch_vcpu_run_pid_change(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ return kvm_arch_vcpu_run_map_fp(vcpu);
+}
+
static int kvm_vcpu_first_run_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
--
2.30.2
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [PATCH v2 3/5] KVM: arm64: Restructure the point where has_run_once is advertised
2021-10-18 21:11 [PATCH v2 0/5] KVM: arm64: Reorganise vcpu first run Marc Zyngier
2021-10-18 21:11 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] KVM: arm64: Move SVE state mapping at HYP to finalize-time Marc Zyngier
2021-10-18 21:11 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] KVM: arm64: Move kvm_arch_vcpu_run_pid_change() out of line Marc Zyngier
@ 2021-10-18 21:11 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-10-18 21:11 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] KVM: arm64: Merge kvm_arch_vcpu_run_pid_change() and kvm_vcpu_first_run_init() Marc Zyngier
2021-10-18 21:11 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] KVM: arm64: Drop vcpu->arch.has_run_once for vcpu->pid Marc Zyngier
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2021-10-18 21:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kvmarm, kvm, linux-arm-kernel
Cc: James Morse, Suzuki K Poulose, Alexandru Elisei, Quentin Perret,
Will Deacon, Andrew Jones, kernel-team
Restructure kvm_vcpu_first_run_init() to set the has_run_once
flag after having completed all the "run once" activities.
This includes moving the flip of the userspace irqchip static key
to a point where nothing can fail.
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 20 ++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
index ccb59ac54976..42efca9853fb 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
@@ -599,8 +599,6 @@ static int kvm_vcpu_first_run_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
if (!kvm_arm_vcpu_is_finalized(vcpu))
return -EPERM;
- vcpu->arch.has_run_once = true;
-
kvm_arm_vcpu_init_debug(vcpu);
if (likely(irqchip_in_kernel(kvm))) {
@@ -611,12 +609,6 @@ static int kvm_vcpu_first_run_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
ret = kvm_vgic_map_resources(kvm);
if (ret)
return ret;
- } else {
- /*
- * Tell the rest of the code that there are userspace irqchip
- * VMs in the wild.
- */
- static_branch_inc(&userspace_irqchip_in_use);
}
ret = kvm_timer_enable(vcpu);
@@ -624,6 +616,18 @@ static int kvm_vcpu_first_run_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
return ret;
ret = kvm_arm_pmu_v3_enable(vcpu);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ if (!irqchip_in_kernel(kvm)) {
+ /*
+ * Tell the rest of the code that there are userspace irqchip
+ * VMs in the wild.
+ */
+ static_branch_inc(&userspace_irqchip_in_use);
+ }
+
+ vcpu->arch.has_run_once = true;
return ret;
}
--
2.30.2
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [PATCH v2 4/5] KVM: arm64: Merge kvm_arch_vcpu_run_pid_change() and kvm_vcpu_first_run_init()
2021-10-18 21:11 [PATCH v2 0/5] KVM: arm64: Reorganise vcpu first run Marc Zyngier
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2021-10-18 21:11 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] KVM: arm64: Restructure the point where has_run_once is advertised Marc Zyngier
@ 2021-10-18 21:11 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-10-18 21:11 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] KVM: arm64: Drop vcpu->arch.has_run_once for vcpu->pid Marc Zyngier
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2021-10-18 21:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kvmarm, kvm, linux-arm-kernel
Cc: James Morse, Suzuki K Poulose, Alexandru Elisei, Quentin Perret,
Will Deacon, Andrew Jones, kernel-team
The kvm_arch_vcpu_run_pid_change() helper gets called on each PID
change. The kvm_vcpu_first_run_init() helper gets run on the...
first run(!) of a vcpu.
As it turns out, the first run of a vcpu also triggers a PID change
event (vcpu->pid is initially NULL).
Use this property to merge these two helpers and get rid of another
arm64-specific oddity.
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
index 42efca9853fb..a52f6a76485d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
@@ -583,22 +583,34 @@ static void update_vmid(struct kvm_vmid *vmid)
spin_unlock(&kvm_vmid_lock);
}
-int kvm_arch_vcpu_run_pid_change(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+static int kvm_vcpu_initialized(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
- return kvm_arch_vcpu_run_map_fp(vcpu);
+ return vcpu->arch.target >= 0;
}
-static int kvm_vcpu_first_run_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+/*
+ * Handle both the initialisation that is being done when the vcpu is
+ * run for the first time, as well as the updates that must be
+ * performed each time we get a new thread dealing with this vcpu.
+ */
+int kvm_arch_vcpu_run_pid_change(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
- int ret = 0;
+ int ret;
- if (likely(vcpu->arch.has_run_once))
- return 0;
+ if (!kvm_vcpu_initialized(vcpu))
+ return -ENOEXEC;
if (!kvm_arm_vcpu_is_finalized(vcpu))
return -EPERM;
+ ret = kvm_arch_vcpu_run_map_fp(vcpu);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ if (likely(vcpu->arch.has_run_once))
+ return 0;
+
kvm_arm_vcpu_init_debug(vcpu);
if (likely(irqchip_in_kernel(kvm))) {
@@ -679,11 +691,6 @@ static void vcpu_req_sleep(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
smp_rmb();
}
-static int kvm_vcpu_initialized(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
-{
- return vcpu->arch.target >= 0;
-}
-
static void check_vcpu_requests(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
if (kvm_request_pending(vcpu)) {
@@ -779,13 +786,6 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
struct kvm_run *run = vcpu->run;
int ret;
- if (unlikely(!kvm_vcpu_initialized(vcpu)))
- return -ENOEXEC;
-
- ret = kvm_vcpu_first_run_init(vcpu);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
-
if (run->exit_reason == KVM_EXIT_MMIO) {
ret = kvm_handle_mmio_return(vcpu);
if (ret)
--
2.30.2
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [PATCH v2 5/5] KVM: arm64: Drop vcpu->arch.has_run_once for vcpu->pid
2021-10-18 21:11 [PATCH v2 0/5] KVM: arm64: Reorganise vcpu first run Marc Zyngier
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2021-10-18 21:11 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] KVM: arm64: Merge kvm_arch_vcpu_run_pid_change() and kvm_vcpu_first_run_init() Marc Zyngier
@ 2021-10-18 21:11 ` Marc Zyngier
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2021-10-18 21:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kvmarm, kvm, linux-arm-kernel
Cc: James Morse, Suzuki K Poulose, Alexandru Elisei, Quentin Perret,
Will Deacon, Andrew Jones, kernel-team
With the transition to kvm_arch_vcpu_run_pid_change() to handle
the "run once" activities, it becomes obvious that has_run_once
is now an exact shadow of vcpu->pid.
Replace vcpu->arch.has_run_once with a new vcpu_has_run_once()
helper that directly checks for vcpu->pid, and get rid of the
now unused field.
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 5 ++---
arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 8 +++-----
arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index d7107d627c54..e0de761ecbf2 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -366,9 +366,6 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
int target;
DECLARE_BITMAP(features, KVM_VCPU_MAX_FEATURES);
- /* Detect first run of a vcpu */
- bool has_run_once;
-
/* Virtual SError ESR to restore when HCR_EL2.VSE is set */
u64 vsesr_el2;
@@ -605,6 +602,8 @@ int __kvm_arm_vcpu_set_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
void kvm_arm_halt_guest(struct kvm *kvm);
void kvm_arm_resume_guest(struct kvm *kvm);
+#define vcpu_has_run_once(vcpu) !!rcu_access_pointer((vcpu)->pid)
+
#ifndef __KVM_NVHE_HYPERVISOR__
#define kvm_call_hyp_nvhe(f, ...) \
({ \
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
index a52f6a76485d..222aabd57147 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
@@ -350,7 +350,7 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_postcreate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
void kvm_arch_vcpu_destroy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
- if (vcpu->arch.has_run_once && unlikely(!irqchip_in_kernel(vcpu->kvm)))
+ if (vcpu_has_run_once(vcpu) && unlikely(!irqchip_in_kernel(vcpu->kvm)))
static_branch_dec(&userspace_irqchip_in_use);
kvm_mmu_free_memory_cache(&vcpu->arch.mmu_page_cache);
@@ -608,7 +608,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_run_pid_change(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
if (ret)
return ret;
- if (likely(vcpu->arch.has_run_once))
+ if (likely(vcpu_has_run_once(vcpu)))
return 0;
kvm_arm_vcpu_init_debug(vcpu);
@@ -639,8 +639,6 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_run_pid_change(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
static_branch_inc(&userspace_irqchip_in_use);
}
- vcpu->arch.has_run_once = true;
-
return ret;
}
@@ -1123,7 +1121,7 @@ static int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
* need to invalidate the I-cache though, as FWB does *not*
* imply CTR_EL0.DIC.
*/
- if (vcpu->arch.has_run_once) {
+ if (vcpu_has_run_once(vcpu)) {
if (!cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_HAS_STAGE2_FWB))
stage2_unmap_vm(vcpu->kvm);
else
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c
index 340c51d87677..8d89ca15f613 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ int kvm_vgic_create(struct kvm *kvm, u32 type)
return ret;
kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) {
- if (vcpu->arch.has_run_once)
+ if (vcpu_has_run_once(vcpu))
goto out_unlock;
}
ret = 0;
--
2.30.2
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread